Response to a BigPharma Corruption Denialist
To those blithely accepting the "safe and effective" myth while ignoring the obvious
Definition of “denialism”: the practice of denying the existence, truth, or validity of something despite proof or strong evidence that it is real, true, or valid (Merriam-Webster)
I have in my close circle someone who prides himself on his capacity for critical thought. When I first became aware of Canadian science professors informing their university boards of the science that COUNTERS mandatory Covid-19 vaccination back in September/October 2021, I turned to friends like this one hoping that with their intellectual capacities and analytical skills they too, would see the weaknesses of the pro-mRNA stance. And I envisioned they would then use their networks of contacts to reach out to as many decision makers as possible to advocate for patient wellbeing (including for existing preventative and treatment options) and against known BigPharma “vaccine product” harms.
To my surprise, instead of believing in the credibility of the professors I was citing, or understanding the momentous implication of their conclusions, my critical thinking friends countered with statements like:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence — completely flipping the responsibility for irrefutable proof of safety & efficacy AWAY from the vaccine manufacturers and government health and safety regulators where it belongs.
You are not a research scientist, so what do you know? Why should we listen to you? — not noticing that I was referring them to publications by actual research scientists with proven credibility in the various fields.
I (we) want to be convinced by solid science and you are not presenting it — not recognizing that when I refer them to the research scientists, those folks link directly to available peer reviewed, or pre-print, studies, or depending on how recently a phenomena is being observed and data being gathered, to professional discussions on the matter. I felt there was little to be gained in cutting and pasting long lists of references into new documents where the explanatory material would be missing. I assumed that when directed to the website or article by Dr. X, Y or Z, these friends would have sufficient intellectual curiosity to continue the search to those references they felt drawn to.
I trust the science — unaware that in the past “the Science” has been shaped, formed, curated, selected, manipulated in totally unprincipled and illegal ways AND IS BEING DONE SO AGAIN.
I read the Pfizer study and it seemed OK to me — unaware of the many ways in which Pfizer massaged & curated the data, leaving out crucial aspects so that the numbers worked in their favour. Unaware of the size of the international team of safety minded researchers who have been analyzing the full records that Pfizer was court ordered to release back in March of 2022 already - unaware that mainstream media made ZERO mention of this highly important data having been ordered released instead of remaining hidden behind a 55 year publication ban!!
Why should we listen to a few “lone wolves” when they so obviously don’t seem willing to “follow the science” and want to “put people at risk” by telling them not to “do the right thing” and get themselves vaccinated — unaware that there is a whole field of highly qualified scientists who have been finding serious flaws with the data presented on the “official side.” Because of such draconian censorship within social and mainstream media, it took time back in 2020-2021 for them to find each other and for laypeople like me to become aware of them.
If I am to believe that the Covid vaccines have been engineered in ways to be purposely harmful - intended to reduce the population, like the conspiracy theorists claim - I need to be convinced that EVERYONE up and down the chain, every politician, every nurse and every doctor is in on the deception — unaware that deception need only be manipulated by a very few and that corporate greed at the top might just be enough to set the corruption machine in motion, leaving many front line staff actually victims.
The claims that Covid-19 vaccines are NOT safe and effective have not been presented in any kind of compelling, rigorous, sufficiently convincing enough manner. There seem to be so many different and opposing arguments and angles that I can’t find an entryway to even know where to start looking — unwilling to apply that same standard of rigour to the “evidence” presented by Pfizer, Moderna, and the various regulatory agencies, and voices from public health, the media and other “official” voices. Also possibly unaware of how the scientific process works in reality…. with so many different components of the injections all potentially causing harm in any parts of the body in different ways, different researchers are finding different results both large and visible like amyloid clots and rapidly growing cancer tumours as well as minuscule and invisible. See the graphic by Marc Girardot for a possible way to navigate through the many different adverse event types identified so far as part of his observatios alone:
If we can’t trust in government authorities that would lead to a total breakdown of society ergo, we need to trust that all is working as it should. This includes the belief that regulators, judges, and all others are working for the best interests of society and that all is well with the world (unaware that it is not.)
NOTE TO A FIRST TIME READER - None of my italicized responses are drawn from thin air. Many have been already written about with references in previous posts. Consider interrupting your reading of this post to go back to this post in particular for an update on what has already been reported on for starters.
All too often, I have felt that the problem with our critically minded BigPharma corruption denialist friends is that they turn their critique in one direction only asking for proof of NOT safety while not being equally demanding when hearing claims of safety.
We often hear that you can lead a horse to water but you can’t make it drink.
Who knows what the horse is thinking as it is being led to water and encouraged to take a drink?
At least in the case of these friends, their comments give us some idea of what barriers they would somehow need to overcome in order to take seriously the work of evidence-based scientists, researchers, physicians and other medical professionals pointing at the LACK of Safety and Efficacy of mRNA.
Looking Back
I started my conversations with this particular friend by speaking about the Canadian vaccinologist entrusted with the responsibility of developing a COVID-19 vaccine candidate for Canada. Dr. Byram Bridle became aware of Pfizer’s own bio distribution study showing how rapidly the lipid nanoparticles left the injection site and ended up in key blood vessel rich organs within hours. (Think high speed rail cars carrying the precious mRNA cargo). Lipid nanoparticles (slippery fat bubbles) were developed for cancer treatment. This meant that the were designed to get around the body quickly and could even slip through the blood brain barrier to supply treatment to brain cancer. At this time, the public health messaging was that the vaccine would remain near the injection site. In fact all the messaging, was simply that which had applied to previous types of vaccines ignoring that mRNA is an entirely different matter. The Pfizer distribution study was soon combined with the Salk Institute finding that the spike protein component of the SARS Cov-2 virus ALONE is responsible for many of the damaging effects of Covid-19. Any self respecting scientist should have put two and two together. And many did much more than that - sharing their expertise with their institutions - explaining this and many other pathways of harm - only to end up unemployed or severely restricted in their scope of practice.
My denialist friends cannot say that these professors did not have the knowledge or background training to write these letters. They cannot say their presentation is not clear, easy to follow and supported with solid references.
https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Part_B_20_pelech_UBC_only.pdf (references imbedded)
See the first two documents archived here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Part_C_37_a_b_38.pdf (references imbedded)
See the third document here - and the link to the full 17 page article with 550 scientific references https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Part_C_37_a_b_38.pdf
This is the type of content I had tried to share via PDF handouts and emails back in 2021, but as the collection grew, I posted it online in the hopes that my contacts would find this an easier way to access the information. Anyone wanting to go back in time can see the Table of Contents here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1635738508414.pdf and can navigate through the various SECTIONS here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io
Thinking Critically
As vaccine safety advocate Steve Kirsch said to a young medical student who wished to prove that it is impossible for Covid-19 mRNA vaccines to cause severe adverse effects or death:
So, essentially whoever wants to use their critical thinking to support the continued use of mRNA based boosters and vaccines needs to come up with evidence backed ALTERNATIVE explanations for the rising numbers of reported adverse effects which currently on just ONE of the world’s databases is showing these numbers:
WHAT is at the root of the phenomenal rise of reported (and unreported) injuries and all cause mortalities world wide, if it is NOT the lipid nanoparticles + mRNA + plasmid DNA + spike protein + PEG + Bolus effect +++ the various other mechanisms already identified as resulting from these injections?
The answer to that should be sought be anyone using their capacity for critical thought…
Today, these “lone wolves” are no longer as lonely, yet they still remain pariahs within their fields at least among folks whose world view is still limited to the space inside the “mainstream” media bubble and the world of “official public health” messaging.
In the meantime though, these and other independent, non-pharma funded organizations have formed, and point to no end of published and pre-print scientific evidence showing the LACK of safety, efficacy and necessity of mRNA vaccine products.
Their work is backed up by pages of solid references that a interested denialist could check out directly. Note for example this document published by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance from LAST fall countering the recommendations for more booster shots made by Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI).
Critical thinking science literate folk can read up on the claims made by NACI as well as the counterclaims by the CCCA and see which arguments are presented in the most compelling, rigorous manner before booking this year’s booster shot!.
Likewise, critical denialists can search far and wide to see now NACI and other bodies pushing for continued vaxxing and boosting present counterclaims to the information shared by the CCCA on adverse events post Covid-19 injection:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/category/vaccine-injuries/
Any critical skeptic seeking compelling data can not only follow my own substack in which I share links to various publications, but also many of the substacks in my list of “recommendations” written by physicians, researchers, data experts and others.
Looking for a “Conspiracy”
There is no need to venture into Conspiracy Theory Territory before deciding whether or not to roll up your sleeve for yet another booster.
It is true that there are many out there who are looking at our current times from different angles like End Times Biblical prophecies and the ascendance of Evil, like author Naomi Wolf, but also warnings of a predictable economic crash every 70 or so years, as explained by financier and former US government insider Catherine Austin Fitts, and of the impending power grab by globalist organizations such as the World Health Organization, the United Nations and others as explained by James Roguski and James Corbett. In fact, some, like the folks at Wide Awake Media have made it their business to provide us with quotes within video extracts spoken by globalist-oriented folks themselves. See People and Agendas under Topics here: https://wide-awake-media.com/#\ to understand that those who pay attention to words and intentions of influential people do not need to “Theorize” about any imaginary “Conspiracies.” Covert and untoward actions abound. We should NOT naively assume that those in positions of influence WON’T make use of their influence for their own benefit!
In fact, our survival instinct always get us on guard in the presence of something suspiciously dangerous. The last deer to jump away, the one staying complacent just a little longer than the others, is always the first to be tackled by the hungry predators!!!
It is out of compassion for those who are are so steadfast in their certainty of their own right-ness that so many of us keep writing substacks and reaching out in other ways. I discovered these spot-on quotations by American social commentator H. L. Menken and share a few here:
For those willing to put aside their insistence on their rightness as well as to try to understand the bigger picture and to learn how COVID can be interpreted as fitting within it, this 2+ hour long documentary packs a lot of information from the past and credible predictions for the future into a small space https://rumble.com/vlmsmn-2030-unmasked-for-those-preparing-for-whats-coming-after-covid-19.html.
But we do not need to go so far afield.
Financial analyst and patent researcher Dr. David Martin succinctly presented this history of Corona virus gain of function research to members of the European Parliament earlier this summer.
Anyone seeking a clear, concise evidence-based presentation of what has been going on by whom, when, how and why can benefit from the information shared here.
As well, the Canada Health Alliance, in its recent newsletter to members explains the business model put together by BigPharma backed World Health Organization that basically outlines the playbook of the past few years.
Disease X And The Business Model of Monetizing an Illusion
We have all heard about the dreaded ‘Disease-X,’ but what exactly is it? The general definition is that Disease X is a placeholder name adopted by the World Health Organization (the WHO) in February 2018 to represent a hypothetical, unknown pathogen that could cause a future epidemic.
It represents the knowledge and acceptance that a serious international epidemic could be caused by an unknown pathogen that causes some catastrophic human disease. The WHO adopted this placeholder name to ensure that their planning was sufficiently flexible to adapt to any unknown pathogen. This planning included things such as broader vaccines and mass manufacturing facilities to ensure faster delivery.
As ‘Disease-X’ was described almost two years before the outbreak of Covid, Covid is, in fact, the first ‘Disease-X’ to appear since this more nimble response and manufacturing business plan was adopted.
And a good business plan it certainly was!
David Bell, a Senior Scholar at the prestigious Brownstone Institute, in his outstanding article ‘Disease-X Is A High-Return Business Strategy’ explains:
“The Covid-19 response demonstrated how the sponsors of international public health institutions have found a way to monetize public health.
This business model involves promoting abnormal responses to relatively normal viruses. It employs behavioural psychology and media campaigns to instil inappropriate fear into the public, then ‘locking them down’ – prison terminology before 2020. The public may then regain a degree of freedom (e.g., fly to visit a dying relative, or work) if they agree to take a vaccine, which in turn directly benefits the original sponsors of the scheme. The heavy public investment in Covid-19 mRNA vaccine development enabled pharmaceutical companies and their investors to reap unprecedented returns.
The major public-private partnership for vaccine development for pandemics, CEPI (inaugurated at the World Economic Forum in 2017), states that “The threat of Disease-X infecting the human population, and spreading quickly around the world, is greater than ever before.”
Health practitioners are quite susceptible to this type of propaganda. Many also seek income from investments and patents from technologies that may help lock others down or make vaccine production quicker and cheaper. Basing their salaries and careers on loyalty to this pandemic industry, they join in vilifying and scapegoating those who speak against it. Shielded by their sponsors’ ‘greater threat than ever before’ claims, they can blind themselves to the major causes of ill health and act as if only pandemic risk matters.
Despite current efforts with yet another variant, Covid-19 is losing its ability to scare. Sustained fear is necessary for politicians in penetrated governments (such as Trudeau’s cabinet dominated by WEF loyalists) to provide this support.
The overall aim is for the public to think that only a corporate authoritarian (i.e. fascist) nanny-state can save them from such a continuing threat. Major natural outbreaks being rare, and lab escapes (which we are now almost certain Covid was) are also infrequent, therefore the pervasive threat of ‘Disease-X’ fills this need. It provides the material for the media and politicians to work with between Covid variants, monkeypox or Marburg events.
For the public, diversion of government financial resources to fairyland diseases will increase mortality by diverting funding from real threats and productive areas of investment. Of course, if increasing lab leaks of engineered pathogens are expected from ongoing and future research, that would be different. But then this would have to be explained plainly and transparently, and prevention may be more effective than a very expensive cure.
Disease-X is therefore just a business strategy, dependent on a series of fallacies, all dressed up as an altruistic concern for human welfare. Embraced by powerful people, the world they move in accepts amoral practice in public health as a legitimate path to their version of success (and obscene profits).
If our primary desire is to channel taxpayer funding into the development of biotechnologies that the public can then be mandated to buy, to their own detriment, but at great benefit to the developers, then Disease-X is the road forward. This business model ensures that a relative few can concentrate wealth gained from the many, at virtually no risk to themselves. The public must decide whether they want to keep playing their submissive part of this highly abusive bargain.”
Having so far been unable to successfully launch a new terrifying pandemic with the likes of monkeypox or Marburg, it looks like the authorities are going to have to try the high risk strategy of using the current crop of rather lame Covid variants such as BA.2.86 to instil panic and implement the Fall / Winter lockdown they need in order to sell the latest consignments of vaccines. Perhaps the headlines of doom warning of the outbreak of the Nipah virus in India will help a bit.
However, with a bit of luck the public are beginning to realize that the sky is not falling, and that Big Pharma can only cry wolf so many times before we cotton on to the fact that this is just a money-making racket orchestrated by a global crime-ring masquerading as benevolent governments and corporations.
The main sources for this article are from David Bell’s article published by the Brownstone Institute which can be found at: https://brownstone.org/articles/disease-x-is-a-high-return-business-strategy/
To access member newsletters of the Canada Health Alliance, please see: https://canadahealthalliance.org
And for those questioning how it is possible for corporations to influence governments (i.e. for fascism aka corporatism to gain a hold in our country, simply read on:
Here we learn of the potential for the world’s largest corporate lobby group to influence government policy prioritizing business “innovation” and “certainty” over national sovereignty and human wellbeing. Looking no further than this “Toolkit for Regulators” put together by the World Economic Forum we see how they are trying to influence our regulators: https://www.weforum.org/about/agile-regulation-for-the-fourth-industrial-revolution-a-toolkit-for-regulators
Just think about this as an analogy.… a lobby group of oil executives putting together a “toolkit” for government regulators monitoring air quality saying… prescriptive regulation - like the requirement to demonstrate irrefutable proof of long term health and safety is too burdensome for Big Business. Big Business is essentially calling national requirements of proof of safety OUTDATED, EXCESSIVE and UNNECESSARY in a document that is targeted at the very governments whose citizens expect them to prioritize PEOPLE OVER PROFITS.
Would critically minded thinkers tolerate this type of approach in any other industry?
Why are we letting it happen in BigPharma? Clearly as Health Canada moves toward the "Agile Regulations” and moves to apply the same fee structure for small manufacturers of Natural Health Products as for the transnational pharmaceutical corporations (in the interest of “outcome based” or “goals based” regulation instead of “rules based” regulation) our government members are already implementing this documentation passed along to them from BigCorp via this WEF lobby group.
And are we aware that the WEF agenda shapers reflect every other industry as well?
At what point will Canadians sit up and take notice of how many of our government initiatives are based on corporate driven “tool kits”?
Hopefully these real life examples will help anyone who came to this post denying that the corporate mRNA products could possibly be harmful, denying that major multinational corporations (or conglomerations of corporations) could be lobbying to shape government policies in their favour, denying the existence of plausible and well explained explanations to fully counter the “official” pro-vax narratives etc. etc.
Hopefully our proverbial horse will now have fewer reservations when it comes to taking in new information.
:-)