Is Electioneering Possible without Hyperbole & Exaggeration?

Many of the NCI testimonies shine a bright light in the darkness of disinformation

Since the mainstream media no longer share “both sides of the story” I have been subscribing to emails from a range of Alberta’s political parties to understand the issues each is concerned about. This email was sent to the New Democratic opposition party led by Rachel Notley in response to their critiques of the United Conservative Party lead by Danielle Smith. I see this as a teaching tool for members of all parties (and citizens in general) to understand the relevance of many of the sworn testimonies presented recently to the National Citizens’ Inquiry.

Hi Nancy, I hope that the staff at "feedback@albertandp.ca" will forward this email to you and to Peggy Wright, who is running in my riding and who to my surprise is also sitting as provincial NDP president at the same time! Please also share it with Chris O'Halloran as I see he sent me something similar at some point three days in a row now to my personal email address. (And re: very recent emails please send this to Joe Ceci and Janice Irwin as the comments they are making pretty much echo yours. -- such that I wonder whether none of you really wrote these emails, but rather they are being ascribed to individual MLAs/Candidates yet coming from the same "promotional" source (or even ChatGPT?)

As a 30year NDP voter (and occasional donor) I am appalled by what you and the rest of the NDP have been messaging of late. I understand the desire to persuade voters to pick NDP over UCP but by writing what you have written, it almost looks to me that you want to get yourselves sued for defamation... What about telling voters what the NDP stands for instead of passing on untruths about your opponents? The most abhorrent statement was Chris O'Halloran's use of the term "the UCP's Reign of Terror" to which I will simply say to him -- or any staff member (or even bot) who wrote that email -- please refresh your high school history knowledge What Alberta has been experiencing is nowhere near this: https://www.britannica.com/event/Reign-of-Terror!!!

Back to your first letter from May 25, Nancy.  Please see the NUMBERS I embedded into your email which reads:

--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Nancy Janovicek <feedback@albertandp.ca>
Date: Thu, May 25, 2023 at 10:31 AM
Subject: The worst is yet to come.

Hannah—

There are just three days left to get as many voters as possible to the advanced polls.

We have the power to beat the UCP’s $3 million ad buy and build a better Alberta together.  (1)

But the UCP has shown that if it were up to them, the worst is yet to come. From the privatization of health care (2) and blatant transphobia, (3) to Trump-style politics (4), their goals for Alberta are getting scarier by the minute.(5) It’s going to take every one of us to stop their big donors' dark money. (6)

Chip in $150 or more today to stop Danielle Smith and UCP’s reign of chaos.

There’s too much at stake to let up now. We can’t let the future of Alberta be dictated by Danielle Smith’s extreme views (7)—with candidates who spread hate about trans children (8), causally sprout racist comments (9), and promote an Alberta that only benefits a select few. (10)

We have the momentum to build an Alberta that supports all of us, (11) and we can’t stop now. We can’t risk letting the UCP’s dangerous ideas become a reality in the premier’s office. (12) Every little bit helps to bring us closer to our ultimate goal. (13a)

We have to stop the UCP from turning our province into a playground for their terrifying plans.  (12) Together, we can build an Alberta that we can all be proud of. But hurry, there are only a few days left to beat Danielle Smith’s big donors and make the vision we’ve fought for a reality. (13b)

CHIP IN TO WIN

Thank you,

Nancy

Nancy Janovicek
President
Alberta NDP

The comments I make here are in reference to the numbered points above. 

(1) This implies that you know what the UCP is spending on ads. If I may be blunt, it appears the NDP is spending even more as I see and hear more NDP ads than UCP ones. In addition, I need to wonder about how much free advertising the NDP seems to be getting, in ways that I am thinking might even contravene the elections regulations (so much pro-NDP anti UCP messaging is coming via union communications to union members and the mainstream media seems to show more positive NDP "news" instead of balanced, neutral reporting as per the Canadian Association of Journalists' Ethics Guidelines -- a case in point was the 1 pm news on 630 CHED radio on Wed. May 24, where the news reader and the citizen being interviewed both really sounded like they were reading off a script written by the NDP instead of a balanced organization providing real NEWS! Please check that out, as it would be very bad if someone set that up - i.e. if it is indeed a violation of election rules.

(2) We have heard the NDP worry about UCP "privatization of healthcare" for decades now. This time, though, I don't think you can ethically put that term out there given that the Federal Health funding recently signed by the various provinces expressly forbids private billing. What has happened in health care is that since the arrival of COVID-19 actual successful treatment for the illness was banned by Health Canada and in turn by Alberta's Public Health officers despite all the evidence to the contrary. Physicians who did their homework, who figured out that no matter what the WHO, the CDC, and any other pharma-funded health agencies were saying, SARS-CoV-2 was not really a "Novel" virus (if we set aside the lab made enhancements)... the same antiviral treatments that were successful for SARS about 17 years earlier WERE SUCCESSFUL for SARS version 2. In fact US cardiologist Dr. Peter McCullough did the groundwork (which the CDC, FDA etc. should have done) checking with physicians in countries hit by COVID-19 first, like China, Italy, etc. to publish an early treatment protocol that STOPPED the virus at the point of entry and in the early stages when it settled in the lungs (before it replicated and caused major inflammation and all the other symptoms of COVID-19.) This protocol kept 85% of patients getting better in a few days AT HOME while the pharma captured agencies followed a different protocol. They were telling everyone to Do Nothing, To Allow The Illness to Get REALLY BAD and Then Come to the Hospital for two items which were already known to improve the health of Big Pharma while making human health worse.... more people died of the LACK OF EARLY TREATMENT + FLAWED LATE TREATMENT in countries which followed the CDC/WHO recently revised guidelines, than in the countries were the OLD PREVIOUSLY SUCCESSFUL Pandemic protocol was followed and where early antiviral treatment was encouraged, not banned. (Please listen to Dr. McCullough's recent testimony to the National Citizens' Inquiry for a full explanation if this is news to you!    https://rumble.com/user/NationalCitizensInquiryCA?q=McCullough) 

In Canada, the NDPs and Liberals were really pushing for the ban on early antiviral treatment while pushing the COVID-19 vaccine products by encouraging the vilification of physicians who did their research and listened to success stories from overseas. This was essentially to allow for the "Great Vaccine Swindle" to happen - allow Big Pharma to pretend no other alternative was in place so that they could then mislead regulators to thinking that of course the ONLY answer to this "novel" virus would be these so-called vaccines. In fact, the definitions of "vaccine" "pandemic" "immunity" "herd immunity" etc. needed to be changed in order for this "Great Swindle" to occur. 

We have so many physicians who are dedicated enough to try to actually help patients before they succumb to "Covid deaths" which is what the official protocol amounted to. But the regulators and medical colleges have been pushing these physicians out of the public health care system by firing & vilifying them and having their licence to practice removed. These physicians truly meant what they said when they swore to uphold the Hippocratic Oath to ensure that no harm comes to patients.

If this is news to you, and/or for more details, please choose to listen to one or more of these researcher & physician testimonies recently given to the National Citizens' Inquiry: 

Dr. Natalie Bjorklund-Gordon, Manitoba expert in Epidemiology and Genetics

Dr. Laura Braden, PEI molecular biologist & immunologist

Dr. Gregory Chan, Alberta family physician

Dr. Francis Christian, former Saskatchewan professor of surgery 

Dr. Charles Hoffe, former British Columbia ER & family medicine physician 

Dr. Eric Payne, paediatric neurologist

Dr. Patrick Phillips, former Ontario ER & family medicine physician 
Dr. Mark Trozzi, former Ontario Emergency Room Physician

Many physicians in a similar situation have had to step outside of the public health care system and have formed something akin to a private health club with regular membership fees in order to offer patients safe and effective COVID related care. These clinics are NOT the UCP policy for health care. There is no need for these "health clubs" to even be necessary. The answer is simple -- allow physicians in the PUBLIC system to prescribe the early antiviral treatments (which also work for Long Covid and certain types of vaccine injuries -- anything related to foreign SPIKE PROTEIN). For more on the early treatment protocols, skim through this four part picture story: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-trust-is-broken-and-safe-treatments)

Many people have been calling on the UCP and the NDP to take health care OUT of politics. We are about to face a great crisis of which most Canadians have ZERO CLUE - the continued pandemic of the vaccine injured. Beating each other up re: health care policy is the WORST thing that politicians can do. Keep the partisanship to other topics, but NOT TO HEALTHCARE, BECAUSE we are in a DIRE EMERGENCY.....as seen by the crazy high all cause mortality in Canada since the rollout of the COVID-19 injections. The title of your email was very apt... the worst is truly yet to come. With 13 million vaccine-related deaths tracked worldwide already, and now about 1 in 300 doses found to create severe life changing adverse effects, we still have not seen the worst of it. Not only is there the very real chance of cardiac related ill effects, but neurological ones are going to be slow to manifest themselves, but inevitable. Our society needs to adjust to the idea of one full time caregiver dropping out of the workforce for every working aged person who may still be developing disorders like Alzheimers, Lou Gehrig's disease, MS and many more It is the working aged people who were/still are most faced with employment related vax mandates and who in many cases already had natural immunity to the virus. Overdosing the immune system with multiple additional doses of spike protein ONCE THE BODY has already been primed to fight spike protein has now triggered a whole cascade of autoimmune illnesses. Every immune cell carrying away a vanquished spike protein then becomes a new target and the cycle continues ad nauseam with immune cell against immune cell and all of them against the hapless body cell tasked with making yet MORE spike protein as per the vax-injected blueprint (mRNA). Every single policy maker at every level of society will need to understand this.  For more on what public policy makers absolutely NEED to understand, see: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/chilling-implications-for-public

(3) No one is phobic of the people who find themselves making the very adult and personal decision to undergo gender transitioning. Just like physicians never allowed a woman to get her "tubes tied" as a birth control method until she had reached a certain age, maturity and self understanding, and piercings and tattoos are not generally done on the very young, so most people expect that undergoing gender transitioning hormone therapy and surgery needs to wait until the adult is very certain that this is the right way for them to proceed, as this is a decision for life.  Hormones and surgery would need to be done on consenting adults who have been supplied with the full range of information required under the principle of "informed consent." This needs to include the benefits and adverse effects of undergoing the procedure AND the benefits and adverse effects of NOT undergoing the procedure. This full range of information was also not provided to patients receiving the COVID-19 injections known as vaccines. And we await a lot of legal ramifications against those who injected toxic substances without giving patients the full range of options needed so that patients could properly consent. What is the NDP proposing to ensure that "gender affirming care" recommendations at the different ages are not experimental and present all the options including that of NOT taking any actions? Current guidelines appear to ban physicians from discussing the option of NOT taking action.

What reasonably minded people (anywhere on the political spectrum) object to is having irreversible chemicals aka "puberty blockers" and gender reassignment surgery prescribed to underage minors. According to a survey in 27 countries in 2021, 1 in 5 people in the "Gen Z" age range (born 1997-2012) identify as transgender, nonbinary, gender-nonconforming or gender-fluid. This number seems to have jumped up very quickly, leading some to wonder what factors have driven this spike. Knowing of the close ties between BigPharma and BigMedia, many wonder whether there has been another "coup" by BigPharma on yet another aspect of the human body, to loop in customers for life. As well, if those who provide "gender affirming care" were able to encourage patients considering transitioning to wait till they have reached the age of adulthood and IF they were to allow the voices of those who regret having undergone transitioning to be just as prominent as those who are happy about their choices, then patients would be better able to provide informed consent. Currently there appears to be a ban on the voices of people attempting to "detransition" yet they have a valuable perspective that should be given consideration. We have just witnessed how BigPharma was able to manipulate data and pull the wool over the regulators' eyes in order to have governments provide a whole new revenue stream (Covid vax). Now we see puberty blockers as the next revenue stream, even better than a vaccine with 3 or 4 .. 7 doses, since "puberty blocker" types of hormone replacement are a lifelong enterprise. It would be insightful to "follow the money" on these types of drugs as well to determine if they lead to "medicalization" of children, as many suspect. Those who are opposed to the "trans agenda" in elementary and jr. High schools, if you were to speak with them, would point to the slippery slope of what happens when BigPharma latches on to yet another set of life long customers. This is not phobia or hate, as some would have you believe, but rather a valid citizen concern shared by those who have just observed what we have learned from the role BigPharma played in the Covid Saga.       

One other issue comes to the fore. Opponents of sexually explicit drag queen story hours for people under 18 are simply providing an opposing voice to a trend they see worrisome. They are aware that some individuals are now identifying themselves as celebrating "minor attracted" sexuality and wonder why it wasn't enough for drag queens to perform for an adult audience. Even within the LGBTQIA+ community, not everyone agrees with opening the doors of adult entertainment to the very young. (We don't do it with other types of nude/semi-nude/sexualzed entertainment - bars and nightclubs don't let in 9 year old children for a reason.) People who understand the various stages of child development worry about the origins of the current ballooning of the diagnosis of "gender dysphoria" asking what role early exposure to ambiguity in terms of gender might have in developing a sense of self... matters for experimentation but ONLY if participants can give their full, informed consent. 

These issues cannot just be understood with simple labels. To insinuate that Conservative voters are "transphobic" again is not the way to go if the NDP is to recruit voters. Explain instead what science the NDP is relying upon when it supports "gender affirming care." Unfortunately, we just learned that there was little truth in the "science" that the COVID-19 vaccine was "safe and effective" The NDP CANNOT be found making the same mistakes again. It is well and good to be compassionate. It is NOT good to allow your compassion to be weaponized by BigPharma who stands to profit while irreversible harms are committed to young people who do not yet have the emotional maturity to make a decision that lasts for life. 

(4) Please explain what you mean by this...Donald Trump was elected on the slogan "Make America Great again." I am sure both the NDP and the UCP want to see a strong Alberta. It is unclear exactly what this part of your letter to voters refers to. Mr. Trump, like Ms. Notley, both believed that COVID-19 vaccination rollouts were needed to save the health care system, etc. Mr. Trump though, until Dr. Anthony Fauci silenced him, was open to trying early antiviral treatments, while Ms. Notley possibly never heard of them or ignored the many letters she received about them and lost the typical NDP scepticism of Big Corporations when it comes to the pharmaceutical industry.

(5) Sorry, exactly what parts of the UCP platform are "getting scarier by the minute"?  I am disappointed that your letter is not doing a point by point comparison of the NDP platform https://www.albertandp.ca/plan  vs the UCP https://www.unitedconservative.ca/ucp-platform-2023/ on various topics.  It sounds like both parties want the best for Albertans on all the things that matter. What exactly in the UCP platform should NDP voters be "scared" of - where do you stand the furthest apart ideologically? Can you lay out your costing for xyz vs. the UCP costing for the same thing and explain which is a better plan?

Just "fear mongering" language, IMHO, is not the way to go!

(6) "Big donor's dark money" - Sorry Nancy  - are you implying that there are donors who are NOT following the $4300 maximum rule? It would appear that both the UCP and the NDP have a list of individual donors. See https://efpublic.elections.ab.ca/efParty.cfm?MID=FP_16&PID=16and https://efpublic.elections.ab.ca/efParty.cfm?MID=FP_7&PID=7.  They both look the same to me more or less with people of the same family name each contributing the same amount, here and there, for both parties. 

(7) Here again, I worry that this phrase "extreme views" is not doing the NDP any favours. This could mean anything for anyone. Just like beauty is in the eye of the beholder, so the interpretation of the word "extreme" varies with the sources of information people follow. For example, for all who are aware of the dangers of Covid-19 vaccines and of the unlawfulness of violating the principle of informed consent, Rachel Notley's public statements all throughout 2021 - 2022 re: getting citizens coercively vaccinated came across as very "extreme." Just like for those who blithely believed in the myth of the "safety and efficacy" of the Covid-19 vaccine product found Danielle Smith's statement of apology to the unvaccinated of the intense pressures they have been through as "extreme." Statements by both leaders have already led to these emails sent and posted here, fyi. https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/finally-this-got-everyone-talking and https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/understanding-the-larger-context.

(8) See (3). Children receiving "gender affirming care"  that supports them in the idea that they may identify as anywhere on the spectrum. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-38909-3; 

https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/transgender; https://globalnews.ca/news/8900413/gender-affirming-healthcare-province-territory-transgender/. Again, this is a very complex issue that would likely fit under the banner of health care. We have repeatedly said that HEALTH CARE should be exempt from the political back and forth. Instead of name calling, work jointly over all parties to ensure that health care experts who delve through crucial health related questions are NOT reliant on Big Pharma monies so that their recommendations are truly free of conflicts of interests... which cannot be said of the health experts providing guidance to governments during the Covid crisis: See: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/?s=conflict+of+interest.

(9) Any examples? Be sure you are not taking comments out of context. 

(10) Again, any examples? It is disappointing to see your letter writer sink to the level of "dog whistles” - purposefully using statements that are intended to rile up the emotions of NDP members. What do you actually mean here?

(11) Why not state what you are proud of having done while the NDP was in government... What did you do that shows how YOU built an "Alberta that supports all of us"?  Please show us the plan - where will the money come from that the NDP keeps announcing will be invested in this and that? How will the current debt and deficit be paid down, while balancing incoming revenues AND expenses?

(12) Sorry, which dangerous ideas?

(13) Which "ultimate goal", which vision? This one?

Our vision for a better future means investing in what we need most in Alberta: Fixing healthcare, cutting electricity rates and capping insurance, hiring teachers and support staff, eliminating small business taxes, and much more. All of this while maintaining the lowest personal and corporate taxes in Canada.

It seems that everyone wants excellent services for the lowest taxes. I still do not understand how very different the two platforms are.  https://www.unitedconservative.ca/ucp-platform-2023/

What I and many others (the over 90% of Albertans who have not gone back for more Covid 19 boosters in the past 6 months) expect to hear from the NDP is how your party will deal with the guilt it has in having Rachel Notley push for Covid vaccines when the censored science - which has since proven to be totally correct - was showing many reasons to NOT PROCEED? Secondly, what actions a Notley government would take to protect Albertans from whichever next steps are within the Agenda 2030 being rolled out in countries such as the Netherlands and elsewhere... I assume as party presidents you and Peggy Wright are both aware of Jagmeet Singh, Justin Trudeau and Chrystia Freeland's involvement with the largest unelected corporate lobby group in the world, the World Economic Forum. I trust that that you understand the position of conflict of interest in which Chrystia Freeland finds herself, as Canada's Deputy Prime Minister AND keeper of our purse-strings in her role as Finance Minister while sitting alongside CEOs of the world's largest pharmaceutical, military, media, investment, tech, AI and other companies.

I trust that you too are aware of the vision of the future held by the Forum leaders and top advisors.  What I and many other informed Albertans are looking for in letters from your MLAs is an indication that your party will disavow itself from membership in and initiatives of these hyperglobalist organizations. I would like to think that you and the rest of the NDP are well aware, for example of the implication of the World Health Organization's global pandemic treaty documents currently up for discussion - documents that will strip every jurisdiction of the powers to determine health care, manufacturing, etc. etc. for themselves. The relationship between the provincial and federal NDP and the relationship between our federal leader of the NDP and the globalists at the World Economic Forum is indeed very worrisome to many. Such that the undefined statement in your letter sent on May 25: "Every little bit helps to bring us closer to our ultimate goal." leaves very very many people very uneasy. An "Agenda 2030"  or "Great Reset" world would look like this one....

Instead of battling with Ms. Smith over "fixing health care" and "reducing taxes" find ways to ensure that THIS is not what you have in mind when you mention "the ULTIMATE GOAL" of the NDP without defining it.

Hannah

Concerned Citizen

PS #1

What I really wanted to send you, before I got sidetracked responding to your letters, was an invitation to verify if indeed you as party presidents are only working with HALF of the information needed to properly draft policies. Having repeatedly tried to inform my MLA Deron Bilous, along with neighboring MLA Janis Irwin, and specific MLAs like David Shepherd, David Eggen, Sarah Hoffman, Christina Grey, either in person or via email... I have noted that in particular the NDP is working with only HALF of the information - the half that is presented on mainstream media like the CBC, Global, etc.

https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/peoples-source-of-news-makes-all

You may be unaware that the Canadian Association of Journalists' Ethics Guidelines mandate that a diversity of viewpoints on all issues be presented. Yet ever since the Trudeau government has been "bailing out" mainstream media with money, it has been clear to many that certain strings must be tied to that money... as we have been regaled with one-sided propaganda like never seen in living memory in Canada.

For more on this topic, please listen to the recent testimonies of former CTV and CBC investigative journalists to the National Citizen's Inquiry: Marianne Klowak https://rumble.com/v2oqo4m-marianne-klowak-gives-an-inside-look-at-cbcs-abandonment-of-journalistic-ex.html and Rodney Palmer https://rumble.com/user/NationalCitizensInquiryCA?q=palmer. (Re: Health reporting see Ottawa Day 2) 

PS #2

This came from you today Nancy - even more hyperbole without backing.... Are you sure you are legally allowed to mislead the public? Or do prior NDP voters not count as the "general public"? 

Hannah—

We have come so far to build a better Alberta, but this is no time to let up.

Advanced voting has started, and there’s never been a more important time to have our voices heard.

Right now, too many Albertans are living in fear of the very real threat Danielle Smith’s extreme views pose to their health and safety. We only have a few days left, and we have to do everything in our power to protect the future of every Albertan. Now’s the time to chip in.

Chip in $150 or more to protect vulnerable Albertans from Danielle Smith’s extreme views.

Danielle Smith’s UCP candidates continue to express unacceptable and frightening comments about our gender-diverse and racialized communities, (examples?? I can think of one but you can see how Danielle Smith took action on that one, Ms. Notley still has not really come clean on what she knew when about Thomas Dang....but I digress) but we won’t stoop to their level. Instead, we remain laser-focused on building our plans for a future that works for everyone.

Your support has gotten us to this point, and we can’t let up now. I know this is a worrying time. Many people have expressed fear about Danielle Smith’s admiration for DeSantis-style policies regarding gender-affirming care. (IF DeSantis believes that informed consent by those mature enough to consent is to be the guideline, then we should all be for this, as that is what the intent of the Canada Health Act is.... Look for and track conflicts of interest please.) But we can’t let this type of hatred (???) continue to guide our policies. Now, more than ever, we need to lead with care and compassion.

Let’s continue to make Alberta better for everyone. Pitch in now to protect our beloved province from the hatred (??? examples??) being spread by the UCP.

=============================================

Another donation solicitation email from another NDP MLA (or so it seems) sent on May 26:

Are you fed up with the constant barrage of UCP outbursts and outright lies? I know I am.

And we’re not alone, Hannah. Albertans across the province are stepping up to reject the UCP’s politics of division, distraction, and destruction. (Who is dividing, destracting and destroying what? Be specific in your writing please.)

Pitch in $150 or more to win the battle for Alberta. Let’s end the UCP’s reign of chaos.   (Chaos was what happened while Jason Kenney was still the UCP leader and Rachel Notley was pushing him to do more, to lock down harder, to vax more people, etc. Given that the UCP is essentially under new management, your examples would need to be from the Smith era. We could all have experienced way LESS chaos, had the pre-2019 provincial emergency management plan - which included pandemic readiness  -- been followed instead of turning the management of every aspect of Albertan life to the public health department. Please listen to thsee two testomonies by emgergency managment specialists who testified to the National Citizens' Inquiry into Canada's handling of the COVID crisis. What promises does the NDP make to Albertans that when the next emergency comes, instead of shoehorning in another department, emergency planning and mitigation will be left in the hands of those whose entire careers focusses on just this topic?

Alberta's former head of emergency mangement, Lt. Col. David Redman: https://rumble.com/v2l9jhw-canada-deviated-from-strategic-pandemic-response-lt.-colonel-david-redman-r.html

Risk management specialist Dean Beaudry: https://rumble.com/v2l6h5s-risk-management-and-covid-19-policies-dean-beaudry-red-deer-day-1-nci.html

We’re so close now. Dedicated people like you are out knocking on doors, putting up signs, and calling neighbours and friends in record numbers.

But instead of building a movement for all Albertans, Danielle Smith and the UCP are trying to spin and spend their way to the finish line. (??? examples? The Calgary Arena? Please explain how that is different from the NDP election campaign spending amounts.)

We can’t let them get away with it, especially in the closest races.

We need to show the UCP that we reject their politics of chaos and extremism. It’s time for a return to Rachel Notley’s sensible government for all Albertans - and to leadership based in reality.

To make that happen, we need your support to match the UCP’s corporate donors and extremist PACs. It’s still too close for comfort. (I take it this refers to the citizen group Take Back Alberta? I honestly do not understand the role that Alberta's public service unions play in connection with the NDP, are they also considered PACs? Perhaps your letters to NDP supporters can explain that at some point. We need more information, not more sloganeering....) 

Help us secure our win.

================================================

Another one

Hannah—

We have come so far to build a better Alberta, but this is no time to let up.

Advanced voting has started, and there’s never been a more important time to have our voices heard.

Right now, too many Albertans are living in fear of the very real threat Danielle Smith’s extreme views pose to their health and safety. (Precisely what extreme views are you talking about here.. that healthy lifestyle choices can help stave off illness? How does that compare with Ms. Notley's views on going door to door with Covid-19 vaccines... wasn't that pretty extreme too? ) We only have a few days left, and we have to do everything in our power to protect the future of every Albertan. Now’s the time to chip in.

Chip in $150 or more to protect vulnerable Albertans from Danielle Smith’s extreme views.

Danielle Smith’s UCP candidates continue to express unacceptable and frightening comments about our gender-diverse and racialized communities, but we won’t stoop to their level. Instead, we remain laser-focused on building our plans for a future that works for everyone.  (REPEAT TEXT - at school copy pasting another person's writing and passing it off as your own would be considered plagiarism... this is one reason I wonder if the MLAs actually write these letters themselves...)

Your support has gotten us to this point, and we can’t let up now. I know this is a worrying time. Many people have expressed fear about Danielle Smith’s admiration for DeSantis-style policies regarding gender-affirming care. But we can’t let this type of hatred continue to guide our policies. Now, more than ever, we need to lead with care and compassion. (REPEAT TEXT)

Let’s continue to make Alberta better for everyone. Pitch in now to protect our beloved province from the hatred being spread by the UCP.

It’s time to dig deep.

The UCP’s deep pockets have desperately purchased millions of dollars in ads. Why? Because it’s their only hope of papering over their candidates’—and leader’s—records, and mobilizing their base.

But right now we’re falling behind by about $600,000. I know I don’t need to stress to you what’s at stake here.

Do NOT let the UCP turn the page on their abysmal legacy. Donate now and help us beat their efforts.

Advance voting will make all the difference in this race. We need to get as many voters as possible to the advance polls before they close tomorrow, May 27th. It’s imperative we get our message out there, and encourage our base—and undecided voters—to act.

That’s why we must match their efforts, dollar for dollar. The UCP reign of terror has gone on long enough. It ends now.

It’s crunch time, Hannah. Help us end this. Donate now.