4 Comments

mRNA shots are transfections. I learned from JJ Couey that is what they are and that tech has been used to induce protein production in lab animals for many years. But these lab animals are not meant to live very long past that point ..Furthermore there's a major difference between a cell suddenly producing a non-self protein away from the mucosa where normal infection takes place (skin, airways, gut) and a whole array of specific cells live which start a cascade of immune signals.

Plus the evidence that any intramuscular shot produces any meaningful mucosal immunity seems thin at best, and cannot train the innate immune system to get better.

Expand full comment
author

Thank you for the reminder of JJ Couey's excellent presentation to the National Citizens' Inquiry. I invite everyone to take a listen here: https://rumble.com/v2ly84a-researcher-j-jay-couey-discusses-the-corona-virus-narrative-red-deer-day-th.html

Expand full comment

You need to show the plasmid that makes the psi-mRNA. That RNA is significantly different than the original and lasts a long time in the body. The plasmids are included in the vial. They are ready to reproduce in the body if they get surrounded by the LPNs. That has a better chance of getting into the genome if it gets in a germ cell or a fetus.

Expand full comment
author

Right, here is ANOTHER reason not to engage with mRNA technology in order to "vaccinate" someone against an illness. Thanks for sharing!

Expand full comment