Death by Misinformation - Re: Organ transplants, Blood transfusion
Invitation to Journalists, health policy makers & the general public
Various journalists have written about the recent deaths of Sheila Annette Lewis and Garnett Harper. Often the tone of the articles is one of condemnation of the individual for stubbornly holding fast to an “unscientific” and “anti-vax” stance.
Here is a chance for all who have been reporting on these stories to hear from the son of Sheila Annette Lewis as part of the open round table series being held by the National Citizens’ Inquiry. This discussion provides listeners with insights from a close family member of the struggles Ms. Lewis went through because of decisions made by medical and legal professionals without the basis understandings re: natural immunity and the risks posed by the so-called Covid-19 “vaccine.” To view Sheila Annette Lewis’ own testimony from earlier this year, please see this link. To learn more about a similar situation, please see the story of Garnett Harper here.
The post that follows is written to all as a challenge to pick up the baton and look more closely into why the medical teams making the decision to mandate mRNA injection as a condition of organ transplantation are continuing to be so misinformed about the science of Covid Vaccine Spikopathy. Ditto for those who are blindly passing along spike protein tainted blood through blood transfusions to people who cannot tolerate the additional toxicity these spike protein pose.
Here, for your information, is the sworn testimony of Samantha Monaghan as she tells the story of how her young son required a blood transfusion. Despite having unvaccinated donors available to provide spike-protein free blood, the physicians in charge went ahead with tainted blood, i.e. blood contaminated with a prior mRNA injection (i.e. Covid vaccinated) with the result that the child died shortly after.
Many of those “covering” the cases make statements along the line of “I do not deny that these people are very courageous but…” and then they go on to make statements that, for those closely following the evolving science around Covid-19 mRNA injection, are very problematic. I am writing you because I share the belief expressed in this quote:
Writers who imply or clearly state ‘doctors know best’ and that the victims who adamantly refuse these injections are in some way misinformed, stubborn, etc. etc. have a LOT to learn. Likewise, those who regurgitate the worry of the transplant doctors that unvaccinated organ recipients are more likely to succumb to COVID-19 after their organ transplants than vaccinated recipients also have no clue about how recent findings re: harm from spike protein injection risks outweighs the harms around the mRNA injection.
Clearly, we cannot put doctors all in one pile, we need to recognizing that some doctors have specializations in one aspect of medicine while possibly not at all being up on the latest research in other specializations. Those doctors who “know best” might simply assume they know best while not realizing that in a domain they are not following directly, MUCH MUCH information has developed since the arrival of Covid-19. Information about which they are not keeping on top of. Evolving information that counters what we all knew and believed about vaccines PRIOR TO mRNA INJECTIONS arriving on the scene.
Perhaps this analogy might help: We have an excellent mechanic. Each time our aging vehicles start clunking around somewhere in their innards, we take these cars to this mechanic - a private one-man operation in a one-man garage. He expertly fixes whatever needs fixing. BUT he draws the line on transmissions and air conditioning units. He knows where his limits are. These two specialities require knowledge he is not keeping on top of, equipment he is not renewing, and skills he is not practicing. He recognizes what he understands and what he should best leave untouched. So if our car troubles relate to those specialties, he encourages us to take our business elsewhere.
The organ transplant team that was dealing with Sheila Annette Lewis and with Garnett Harper would have been wise to recognize their lack of expertise in immunology and in particular, in the rapidly advancing field of Covid-19 related immunology and vaccinology. When Ms. Lewis provided evidence from BC’s Kinexus lab of her robust immunity to Covid-19, instead of ignoring that evidence, the doctors should have contacted the principal researchers there, people such as Dr. Steven Pelech. Had they done so with an open mind, they would have gained an understanding of the risks to an already immunocompromised person of overwriting a full spectrum immunity derived from the body’s successful recovery from Covid-19 with a limited response to vaccine-induced spike protein antibody production.
If the transplant doctors were so worried about Ms. Lewis’ chance of falling victim to Covid-19 AFTER her transplant, they would have learned from Dr. Pelech that her chance of harm from Covid would be greater than it was from her naturally acquired immunity. This apparently counter-intuitive statement is understandable only once one recognizes that the “vaccination” is essentially the injection of a product meant to provide short lasting immunity to one mutation of only one of many proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That can’t beat broad spectrum natural immunity which carries over regardless of mutations, as we saw in the case of patients who fought off SARS seventeen years ago, still producing antibodies that fought off SARS-CoV-2!!
The organ transplant team, unlike my mechanic, did NOT recognize the limits of their expertise. I can tell because within their statements, there seems to be no recognition of the increased chance of transplant organ rejection in a person “vaccinated” against Covid. Clearly the team did not recognize the role that 30 trillion excess spike protein floating around in a body can play. Did they even know that the ONE component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that CAUSES THE MOST INFLAMMATION is the ONE component of the virus that the mRNA instructions cause the body to produce?
Some journalists inter articles point out that there is nothing in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms forcing physicians to act contrary to their professional judgment. While the Charter might not quite say that, the Hippocratic oath sworn by doctors in Canada commands them to “DO NO HARM”.
In as much as Alberta Health Services and all the medical staff they employ are in some way responsible to the Alberta government, it is incumbent on the government to ensure that our physicians actually DO NO HARM. Are you aware that the medical colleges are going after physicians who have been following internationally recognized therapeutic protocols to provide safe and effective treatment for Covid-19? And that they have raided doctors’ offices if they suspect those doctors have been granting vaccine exemptions in violation of orders that were pushing the vax on everyone regardless of pre-existing health conditions? Even those conditions that should logically preclude an assault of 30 trillion spike protein coursing around the body and creating havoc? Even those with previous myocarditis, and all the cardiac, digestive and neurlogical disorders ALREADY KNOWN TO BE EXAERBATED due to the mRNA injections BEFORE the fall of 2021 when most employee “proof of vaccination” mandates rolled out?
So here we have powers that be clamping down on doctors who are doing GOOD for their patients (by actually treating them and/or exempting them from harm) while those who actually HARM patients, and LET THEM DIE, like this transplant team, are being seen as having done the correct thing by not having “given in” to their patients’ so-called stubborn “misinformation”? Wasn’t it George Orwell who wrote of a world where up is down and down is up? Or right is wrong and wrong is right?
Clearly this transplant team, and likely the physicians dealing with Ms. Monaghan’s son and with Garnett Harper were unaware that aspects of their patients’ cases were out of their wheelhouse. In Health Canada’s world the Covid-19 vaccine is still the “standard of care” while actual effective treatment and preventative protocols are seen as “dangerous misinformation”. As a result, physicians attending the officially run medical education conferences are NOT learning about the evidence base behind early treatment protocols for Covid-19, or of treatment for those suffering from Covid-vaccine induced adverse effects, or of the ins and outs of natural vs. vaccine induced immunity.
The least you as current affairs journalists and I as a public educator can do, is point out that doctors are not equal to doctors and that just like mechanics, certain specializations require specialized knowledge. Please see this post for a simple 10 question test that we can share with those to whom we turn for medical advice. Any journalist seeking to quote an “expert” for backup in an article related to COVID-19 matters can share this with them as a way of screening out those who, in the flurry of their very important work and busy personal lives have NOT YET sat down to update their knowledge of evolving evidence-based findings around the illness, the various pathways of harm from the injections as well as prevention and treatment of such harms. People who do not score more than 80% on this test need to gently be told that they are not yet qualified enough to make pronouncements on the whole matter of whether or not someone should or should not be following Health Canada’s guidance when it comes to the taking of so-called mRNA based “vaccines.”
Sadly, Health Canada’s guidance on this matter is being driving by policymakers who are being kept from evolving evidence-based science in the fields of virology or immunology or vaccinology - people who have little awareness of the growing insights related to what is emerging as a brand new field: that of spikopathy, or the pathologies related to the injection of mRNA instructions for the manufacture of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein.
Canadians aware of this evolving evidence based field of knowledge continue to be appalled at the LACK of such knowledge by those who make or write about policies related to Covid mitigation.
For any mainstream journalists reading this far, I am aware that your day-job essentially has you rated by how much clickbait you can effectively churn out… or at least this is what I get from reading this description of the way Newsweek ran its journalism shop back in 2019!! If this is in any way reflective of the news business at all mainstream news outlets these days, we need to ask you to do what all the rest of us are doing…. working diligently after hours (UNPAID) to research what is not being said in public, following the words and insights of the experts who treat COVID-19 patients, instead of those who expound upon the so-called misinformation these experts speak of!!!
Hopefully when you realize that there is a whole cohort of professional and citizen journalists out there going further and deeper and hitting harder, “telling it like it is” without needing too worry too much about remaining “politically correct” or “supporting the current thing” as a virtue signalling move you will be emboldened to do the same. (See the post about breaking out of the corporate media bubble for inspiration and multiple trails to follow.)
And please let me provide you with a bit of assistance to better understand how the actual problem is NOT that the “doctors know best” while patients are dying due to their stubborn adherence to “misinformation.”
Your fellow journalist at the Sudbury Star wrote about Garnett Harper:
Looking up the Canadian Association of Transplantation online I quickly found from their financial statement of 2019, that roughly one quarter of their revenue comes from grants. Curious to find more, I noted the participation of the CAT in the World Congress of Transplantation which, is clearly in some kind of relationship with the World Health Organization.
One would need to have more contacts in high places to really get at the money trail. And a place to start looking would be with the book The Real Anthony Fauci, as its author, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. did a deep dive into the ties between BigPharma, the World Health Organization and the regulatory agencies.
I contend that a deeper investigation as to why high placed transplant scientists seem UNAWARE of three years worth of evolving scientific findings on the topic of natural vs vaccine induced immunity and on the toxic components & processes of the mRNA in these Covid-19 injections would point to other forces - forces that keep information from the relevant specialists. Or forces that keep those receiving information contrary to their funding sources silent… up to the point of letting death occur. What was causing the doctors in all of these three cases to KEEP THEIR EYES and EARS SHUT?
Image: Alamy.com
ONLY two things come to mind:
Hubris: “The stance WE hold is the ONLY CORRECT ONE, let the patients die for their misinformed stance!”
Cowardice: “We know the science doesn’t support our stance, but we don’t want to speak out and loose our jobs, licences, status, funding, reputation etc. EVEN if that means patients will die as a result of misinformed official policies….”
To you, the investigative journalists, the crime scene detectives, those signing off on policies made by others, the doctors, nurses, technicians and all whose very lives and careers are at stake, the informed public, the day to day Canadians, comes the task of really digging into the whole picture.
Otherwise, if these misinformed policies requiring the triple or quadruple or quintuple nonsense injection of spike protein instructions are allowed to stand, these people AND EVERY CANADIAN who is now not “up to date” with their injections (which is the majority of us) would not qualify to receive a transplant and will be facing the same kind of senseless martyrdom as Garnett Harper, Sheila Annette Lewis and the son of Samantha Monaghan.
I am passing the baton back to you.
No more evidence-free reporting.
Listen, learn, investigate, report…. that is your true calling!
Please don’t let us down.