How up to date is your Doctor's Knowledge really?
How up to date is your Doctor's Knowledge really?
A simple test to find out your health care provider's expertise level re: Covid-19 prevention and care, vaccines and boosters
It takes humility and grace to admit that one doesn’t know everything, that certain things are “not in my wheelhouse”, that others’ expertise may be more up to date than our own.
If the doctor, pharmacist, public health nurse, TV “science expert” or whoever you rely on for your medical advice, scores less than 80% on the following short 10-question quiz, kindly inform them that they will require further upgrading in the field of ‘spikopathy’ or the emerging science behind the actions of mRNA-induced SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in the body. And that currently, you will be needing to take your health advice from others who have already upped their personal education levels in all things COVID.
The official medical education provided to physicians and others in the medical field is funded and organized by the official entities and groups who are highly invested in the “safe and effective” narrative around COVID-19 vaccination products, and is therefore inadequate when it comes to ensuring your medical provider has the latest information as it is evolving in the field on a near daily basis.
The same goes for the self-assured yet misinformed science communicators to whom our mainstream media usually turn for “expert advice.” We have long since established various phenomena such as “Science Frozen in Time” that have contributed to policy makers and other high level “influencers” being kept away from rapidly evolving evidence-based research in the field. Please see our letter to members of the Canadian Association of Journalists’ Ethics Advisory Committee on the matter of blockages in the information trail for example. Or this “lesson plan” for people relatively new to the idea that mainstream media has been keeping key information re: COVID-19 illness and vaccine products from Canadians. It was shared on this substack back in May 2023.
For someone really wanting a deep dive into what even started me on this substack journey, please see the “think-aloud protocols” I wrote as in 2020-2021 I tried to follow the sources of information possibly provided to my then provincial chief medical officer of health… sources like the writings of the Alberta Scientific Advisory Group (SAG) and the various databases used by Health Canada employees (as far as I could tell from the outside).
https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io
In particular, Documents 5, 10, 11 and 12 found here illustrate how those we assume are following evolving science the closest, are in fact not doing so at all!!
Everywhere I saw the sad story… those advising us are relying on information that is woefully out of date while being told that those communicating up to date information are “spreading misinformation”.
How do we know what doctors actually know?
We can encourage them to take this little 10 question quiz. If they cannot answer these questions correctly, we can encourage them to seek out medical education OUTSIDE of the “official” umbrella, from people who know this stuff inside out. Via Zoom, via uncensored platforms like Rumble, Bitchute, Substack, and sometimes Twitter/X, interested physicians (and all interested citizens) can learn directly from those in the field who are rapidly amassing a whole new knowledge base.
At some point in the last 3 years, people like the members of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance’s Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee have become aware of who is finding and publishing what about which aspects related to spiko-pathology or the emerging field of spike protein damage across all body systems, be it due to Covid-19, Long Covid, or Covid vaccine induced injury.
How does your doctor rate on the up to date information scale?
How accurately can you/your doctor answer these 10 questions?
If you wish to print off these questions to have something to leave with your health care provider, scroll to the linked PDF versions near the bottom of this post.
What is the furin cleavage site of the SARS-CoV-2 virus?
Something that can be seen under a microscope.
Evidence that the virus has been artificially manipulated.
The part of the virus that is directly impacted by the vaccine.
How does coating ACE-2 receptors help keep Covid-19 cases mild?
It prevents the SARS-CoV-2 virus from gaining a foothold in the body.
It is one of the effects of the vaccine, to increase antibody counts.
It helps the spike protein make connections with the immune cells.
What was wrong with Pfizer’s claim of 95% efficacy?
The math. It should have been 98%.
The data that was purposely left out. It should have been closer to 19%.
Nothing. The vaccine prevented 95% of recipients from getting Covid in the first 6 months.
What was wrong with the studies that showed how hydroxychloroquine was NOT an effective treatment for COVID-19?
The timing. They purposely gave HCQ to patients in the later phases of the illness, when it had no effect, instead of in the early phase to prevent viral replication.
The dosage. They purposely gave patients an extraordinarily high (lethal) dose.
Both A and B.
Neither A or B. The studies were fine.
Which provides a more robust and long-lasting immunity against a respiratory illness?
Recovery from infection.
An mRNA vaccine.
An attenuated live virus vaccine.
Why was there such a surge in RSV cases last year, after COVID-19 immunization was authorized for young children?
Because that coincided with a shortage of children’s Tylenol.
Because excessive spike protein production induced by the vaccines weakened the childrens’ immune systems.
Because of all the anti-vax parents who chose not to protect their children.
Which of the following statements about Vitamin D is correct?
A large portion of people who had severe Covid were also severely Vitamin D deficient.
To say that increasing Vitamin D intake can help prevent Covid is an example of misinformation.
Vitamin D has no measurable effect on respiratory illnesses whatsoever.
What do Bromelain, Curcumin and Quercetin have in common?
They all inhibit the binding of spike glycoprotein with the body’s ACE2 receptors and therefore should be prescribed.
They all interfere with the mechanisms of the mRNA transcription process in the vaccinated and therefore should NOT be prescribed.
They are some of the natural health products that, unfortunately, are being advocated by those pushing Covid misinformation.
What do Dr. Vladimir (Lev) Zelenko, Dr. Peter McCullough and Dr. Paul Marik have in common?
They are some of the most influential providers of medical misinformation.
They successfully treated COVID-19 before any of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines were even available.
They are/were some of best-known Directors of the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD) in the CDC.
What is the significance of the increase in “excess death” statistics in Canada starting in 2021?
This proves that we had a “pandemic of the unvaccinated” at that time.
It shows how working aged Canadians (those most likely to have encountered proof of vaccination mandates as a condition of employment) have died from all types of illnesses at a much higher rate than other demographics.
It clearly shows that the elderly were most at risk from dying of Covid-19.
How well did you/your doctor do on this test?
b - For more on the “gain of function” manipulation, the patent applications on components of the virus and the vaccine prior to 2019, please listen to patent researcher Dr. David E. Martin’s address to the European Parliament in which he lays out the case showing human, not natural causes for SARS-CoV-2. For insights into the ties with the US Department of Defense, please listen to Pharma-insider/whistleblower Sasha Latypova here and on her substack.
a - The ACE2 receptor is essentially like velcro… it is how the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein binds to the body. The mechanism is described here, so to inhibit this, researchers found that therapeutics like Ivermectin that inhibit the binding of the spike protein to the ACE2 receptor, thereby prevent the virus from replicating. See the Velcro vs Teflon analogy described here as well as the therapeutics mentioned on the Immunity Boosting Alternatives to Fall Boosters handout provided here with further details provided by Dr. William Makis.
b - for a first hand report on what Pfizer purposely left out, please listen to the testimony provided to the National Citizens’ Inquiry (NCI) by Dr. David Flower, a member of the Daily Clout project to analyze the court ordered release of Pfizer Data (something that to this day Canadian mainstream media have remained silent about.)
c - Bioweapons expert Dr. Meryl Nass documented the many ways in which one of the best-known early antiviral treatments for COVID, HCQ, was purposely maligned to make way for the Emergency Use Authorization of the mRNA vaccine platform. Dr. Nass outlines 56 actions taken by various powers that be to this end.
a - Here we see how back in 2021 already, researchers were finding an “equivalency” between natural immunity and vaccine induced immunity despite that being when the drums were beating for employers to mandate proof of vaccination requirements to “protect” their workforce and customers. Also in early 2021, the majority of Canadians were said to already have a pre-existing antibody reactivity toward the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This despite having not been infected with Covid, showing that natural immunity as a result of other Corona virus infections were already protective.
b - Please listen as paediatric neurologist Dr. Eric Payne outlines the impact of Covid-19 injection on children.
a - For more on Vitamin D deficiency please see the links to these studies or listen to this presentation at the World Council for Health.
a - Search out these therapeutics on Dr. William Makis’ substack to find summaries and links to published research such as this one.
b - For their treatment protocols please see https://vladimirzelenkomd.com/treatment-protocol/ and the ever evolving https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/. Many of these were first developed and published in 2021 while mainstream media and public health authorities were telling the population that there is no treatment for COVID-19 other than to wait at home until they could barely breathe. See this protocol for Covid prevention and care for nursing home residents published August 2021. Physicians who work with the elderly would do well to try to implement this protocol - and if public health authorities do not allow for this type of successful treatment, to lobby against decisions being made by those whose information is over 2 years OUT OF DATE.
b - Follow presentations of all cause mortality and excess death statistics by Edward Dowd here and here and Dr. Denis Rancourt here.
So as our media begins the annual hype of the latest big thing… this time the
New Tridemic…
https://globalnews.ca/news/9923460/tripledemic-canada-fall-influenza-rsv-covid/
asking: What is the best thing parents can do to brace for the coming potential “tripledemic” of influenza, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and COVID-19,
realize that those who push for more vaccination are either so traumatized from the last time around that they cannot see straight, or are woefully uninformed, or in some way benefitting from what is clearly NOT a benefit to the majority.
I had written this around 21 months ago, and sadly, it still seems to apply to some people…
Dec 31, 2021
There are ONLY FIVE reasons why someone would continue pushing the pro-vax narrative:
1.They were made SO AFRAID of COVID, due to the reporting we were all seeing Dec 2019 to about March 2020 that they have not been able to look past that point in time
2. They are living in a bubble, hearing only proVAX news, speaking only with proVAX people, etc. NAIVELY unaware of the world beyond that point.
3. They are willfully closing their ears and eyes to anything that contradicts the proVAX narrative (maybe in denial or still in fear)
4. They or their institutions stand to profit in some weird way (or stand to lose their jobs and reputations if they speak out... Dr. Peter McCullough for example seems to
be losing titles every month, the longer he speaks out!!)OR
5. If they are in the position of Dr. Tam, they were somehow coerced into accepting terms from Pfizer, such that they are UNABLE to speak up about what the data is really saying. The deafening silence on the dangers of the COVID-19 vaccines we are getting from Dr. Tam stand in sharp contrast to statements she made at the Li Ka Shing forum on June 22, 2021 about “embracing” science and the irresponsibility of not adapting one’s approach to policy in line with scientific advances. Already at that time policy makers and government scientists were not following the science in the field that spoke against the proVAX narrative.
It is a disaster that this has not yet changed. This is why there are calls from many sides for our governments and decision makers to "turn this ship around."
PRINTABLE version of the Quiz for your Doctor!
PLENTY OF FREE (or nearly free) MEDICAL EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES ABOUND!
How can physicians and other health care workers learn more about these evolving topics in Covid-19 related evidence-based medicine? How can ordinary citizens keep abreast of a dizzying array of information?
Here are some suggestions:
—> Listen to the frequent talks given within the NEWSROOM of the World Council for Health.
—> Sign up for membership with the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (for $50/year) to take part in weekly roundtable meetings with a range of experts pooling their observations and growing knowledge base.
—> Listen to all of the testimonies by the various science educators and other professionals who testified to the National Citizens’ Inquiry
—> Watch any number of thoughtful and informative shows presented by the Childrens’ Health Defense
—> Take part in the weekly live streams of the Vaccine Safety Research Foundation (VSRF).
—> Take part in the weekly webinars and other Education on Demand type of tools offered by the Frontline Critical Covid Care Alliance.
and check out past posts of this substack - written mostly for a lay person audience, and those new to the news outside of the mainstream/public health bubble. For starters: see these four “Possible Door Openers”.
