New Observations --> New Hypotheses, this is how Science is done!!
Introducing the Bolus Theory of Vaccine Injury
Introducing the Bolus Theory article by PANDA (Pandata) member Marc Girardot (link follows below).
So in a very short time span, we got from the naive, glib and trusting (paid) messaging:
to the tragically sad reality that the Covid-19 vaccine products foisted upon us were anything but SAFE, EFFECTIVE and NECESSARY. (To see David Dickson’s graphics of the big jump in Canada’s cumulative deaths due to Canada’s Covid response in full size, please visit https://dksdata.com/ExcessDeaths).
From Dr. Byram Bridle’s first clarion call that “we are making a big mistake”
(Source:https://www.rebelnews.com/interview_dr_byram_bridle_leading_viral_immunologist_and_vaccinologist_on_covid-19_vaccines)
as reported in the decentralized (independent, non-pharma-connected) media back in 2021 to today, we can observe the scientific process in action. Scientists and treating physicians of conscience, as people of moral courage and a deep sense of purpose, continuously observe, question, hypothesize, observe, question, and hypothesize some more, thus gradually building a whole new field of knowledge. In other words, they FOLLOW, BUILD ON and EXPAND the science.
Meanwhile, self-important commentators who do not have the needed intellectual curiosity to delve into a field of specialized knowledge new to them, and who are often paid to be gatekeepers, or who simply fear the collapse of their world view if what is stated could be true, screech at full blast: THIS IS ALL MISINFORMATION!!! It is as Naomi Wolf stated so eloquently in a recent post on the perils of being a truth teller in our time - most commentators consider as “wacky” what they are not intelligent enough to understand!
So here we have people who have put their minds to understanding why post roll-out, there have been incredible spikes in all cause mortality, sudden & unexpected collapses on sports fields, in swimming pools, in front of news cameras, at the dinner table, and lots of sudden adult deaths while sleeping. Not to mention the scores of people needing to go on medical leave, due to exacerbated or entirely new seemingly unrelated health issues.
Observant, courageous people have found serious shortcomings as well as disabling and deadly consequences of every aspect of the products bought, sold, advertised and injected as Covid-19 ‘vaccines’.
PEG, adjuvants, etc.
lipid nanoparticles
mRNA/DNA
inconsistency from vial to vial
the various effects on the cells and tissues, clotting mechanisms, immunity, etc. etc. of vaccine-generated spike protein
and much more
A recent unexpected addition to this list has been:
the pathways in which this spike protein can travel, including via the bone marrow of the skull to the meninges and to brain tissues causing neurological damages.
Reading how Dr. William Makis discusses this and listening to Dr. Mobeen Syed explain the preprint study that outlines these observations helps us gain an even deeper admiration for those who engage willingly and openly with where scientific discovery leads - despite how grim the findings.
Everyone coming to solve the puzzle of mRNA mechanisms of harm comes with their own angle, their expertise and training, their ways of looking at the world and all the details within it.
Marc Girardot is a member of multidisciplinary team put together in 2020 running under the name PANDA (or Pandata). The aim is “collective sensemaking”, i.e. using a wide interdisciplinary range of perspectives to make sense of what we are being told to better sift through the facts, the fears, and more.
From that view, Marc Girardot pulled together what has emerged since 2020 around the pathways of harm of Covid vaccine products. It all makes for an impressive flowchart!
Then, thinking as a physicist instead of a biologist, he hypothesized whether speed, pressure, and velocity of “vaccine” fluid being injected into the bloodstreams could also be a factor.
I leave you with this as an additional piece of the COVID “vaccine” puzzle.
Enjoy the mental journey!
"Not Bolus Theory, but "Accelerated Aging Theory" of Vaccine Injury
I need some help understanding this. First, it's a great flow chart. If I understand bolus right, and this might be my problem, "bolus" means the shot density into the person. Hasn't it been accepted for some time that the density and volume are what make the countermeasure so dangerous. (Of course we have to include the long lifetimes of the psi-mRNA and LPN and spike and total volume of spike produced over time that is active, not inactive, etc) I would have to stay it is the quantity of each of the intended and unintended products from vial through the lifetime of the vial contents and all its biproducts that produces the lifetime adverse effects/events. That, coupled with the biology of the recipient, determines the final outcome, but the general path is toward accelerated aging of the person along with accelerated deterioration of body function. "Bolus" doesn't capture the lifecycle of the vial contents and all the biproducts. It doesn't capture the idea of time and continued consequence. The hypothesis should be "Accelerated Aging Theory of Vaccine Injury".
It's fair to say we all want a simple answer (virus/no virus) or mRNA bad/traditional vax okay but the reality is a sordid mess of intricately woven truths, lies, knowns and unknowns. Scientifically, the pursuit of all of these mechanisms is great but they can be selected and/or manipulated by those with influence and power to obscure other issues and continue pushing medical interventions.
While I find this personally interesting, the bigger issue lies in the use of force and coercion of medical products upon the populace and that's not an issue of science.