I would like to write a letter to the 129 signatories. Are their names available to the public or are they, like Timothy Caulfield, unwilling to engage with anyone who can successfully rebut their arguments?
Hi there, I don't think the names are public. But write your letter anyway and then drop it off at the various medical offices you deal with (if you are in Edmonton) That association includes all sorts of medical professionals in its membership. Maybe the physio, or eye doc, or GP you see knows someone who is a member and signed the letter.... and even if they did not sign, your letter can still be educational to med professionals you know. Even if you are not in Edmonton, reach out to your local health providers to share the info anyway. I spoke to a nurse recently telling her: I really feel for you. During the day you hear one version of the story from your higher ups. Then in the evening and weekends in your private life, you run into people like me to are giving you facts and data that stand in opposition to what your higher ups are telling you at work. You must be so confused. Just know that your higher ups don't have access to the full story. We can see it with medical journals that refuse publications based on newer evidence that doesn't follow the "safe and effective" vax line. We also see it with the news - when the news wire services our papers rely on the most (like Canadian Press) don't even run any of the really important stories. One example: Page 2 of Issue 14 here: https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/csn-week-14-vol-1-issue-14
I too attended all three days of NCI hearings in Regina on May 30, 31 and June 1st. I've come to the conclusion that the world is divided into two groups. Those who seek the truth, and those who don't. But also those who want others to know the truth, and those who want to hide the truth. Most disturbing is that many in the so called health profession are committed to hiding the truth. Every person who signed the letter ought to attend the Injecting Truth event and then write a detailed and referenced rebuttal if they still hold the same perspective. But to announce an opinion prior to attending the event tells me they make decisions based on ideology, not evidence.
Thank you so much for this very balanced & well researched article. Having personally attended all three days of the National Citizens Inquiry in Regina, Sask just 2 weeks ago, I can confidently state that the truth heard at these hearings is undeniable. The enormity of the scientific findings presented to the people at the hearings cannot be ignored. One only has to hear to know what you are being told is hard sought after facts.
I would like to write a letter to the 129 signatories. Are their names available to the public or are they, like Timothy Caulfield, unwilling to engage with anyone who can successfully rebut their arguments?
Hi there, I don't think the names are public. But write your letter anyway and then drop it off at the various medical offices you deal with (if you are in Edmonton) That association includes all sorts of medical professionals in its membership. Maybe the physio, or eye doc, or GP you see knows someone who is a member and signed the letter.... and even if they did not sign, your letter can still be educational to med professionals you know. Even if you are not in Edmonton, reach out to your local health providers to share the info anyway. I spoke to a nurse recently telling her: I really feel for you. During the day you hear one version of the story from your higher ups. Then in the evening and weekends in your private life, you run into people like me to are giving you facts and data that stand in opposition to what your higher ups are telling you at work. You must be so confused. Just know that your higher ups don't have access to the full story. We can see it with medical journals that refuse publications based on newer evidence that doesn't follow the "safe and effective" vax line. We also see it with the news - when the news wire services our papers rely on the most (like Canadian Press) don't even run any of the really important stories. One example: Page 2 of Issue 14 here: https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/csn-week-14-vol-1-issue-14
I too attended all three days of NCI hearings in Regina on May 30, 31 and June 1st. I've come to the conclusion that the world is divided into two groups. Those who seek the truth, and those who don't. But also those who want others to know the truth, and those who want to hide the truth. Most disturbing is that many in the so called health profession are committed to hiding the truth. Every person who signed the letter ought to attend the Injecting Truth event and then write a detailed and referenced rebuttal if they still hold the same perspective. But to announce an opinion prior to attending the event tells me they make decisions based on ideology, not evidence.
Thank you so much for this very balanced & well researched article. Having personally attended all three days of the National Citizens Inquiry in Regina, Sask just 2 weeks ago, I can confidently state that the truth heard at these hearings is undeniable. The enormity of the scientific findings presented to the people at the hearings cannot be ignored. One only has to hear to know what you are being told is hard sought after facts.
.
We Didn’t Need To Find The Cure For Cancer.
We Found The Cause.
.