When charges of "meddling" sideline the MAIN ISSUES -- the unscientific nature of Public Health Orders
Letting the Totality of Evidence guide recent discussions
This message is addressed to all who are commenting on the issue of Alberta Premier Danielle Smith having or not having looked into the reasons why arrests were made under the Public Health Act.
Background: Pastor Art Pawlowski was one of the various Canadian pastors and other individuals fined and/or arrested for alleged violations against social distancing or public gathering orders initiated by those charged with following Health Canada guidelines re: COVID-19 restrictions.
Danielle Smith, while campaigning to be the new leader of the Alberta United Conservative Party, committed to looking into (and hopefully reversing) the various charges against individuals who allegedly violated these orders.
Currently, much media space and attention is being devoted to whether or not a sitting Premier has the right to communicate with the justice system re: charges and investigations in progress and whether she did or did not ‘interfere’ or ‘meddle’ in the judicial process, etc. Of course, in a democracy, there should be a separation of powers with elected officials allowing the courts to function independently.
However, we have seen that globally, our democracies have been infiltrated with corporate ‘interference’ or ‘meddling’ which has clearly put human life at risk.
WHAT IS BEING TOTALLY MISSED IN THE SMITH/PAWLOWSKI DISCUSSION:
On what scientific basis the public health orders re: COVID-19 were being grounded
Given the totality of evidence already known at the time these orders were put in place (BUT SKILLFULLY KEPT FROM the public, including from Public Health decision makers, politicians, judges and other influential individuals) what is to be done about public health orders that were NOT GROUNDED IN SOLID SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE? What is the process for reversing the orders and the charges made under invalid orders?
There should be a much greater investigation into how public health decision makers were kept from known evidence pointing at MUCH DIFFERENT POLICY OPTIONS than those that were decided upon. Premier Smith had indicated that she realized that as a Premier she cannot interfere in the judicial process. But the JUDICIAL PROCESS, the INVESTIGATIVE MEDIA, the JUDICIARY and the HEALTH BUREAUCRACY ITSELF can and should investigate how it came to be that Public Health Officials were KEPT FROM THE FULL Totality of Evidence available already in 2021.
This is not a political election campaign type of issue. This issue forces all parties and all societal influencers to take a long hard look at how they themselves were captured and mislead.
The Totality of Evidence
Questions to ask:
Did our public health officials when they rolled out lockdowns, masking, distancing and vaccination policies actually have access to this totality of evidence? Clearly not.
Did those who attempted to protect the “safe and effective” narrative for these mitigation measures have a “totality of evidence” with which to support their claims? No!
Our public health officials, politicians, and many other societal leaders, alongside many employers, union leaders, journalists, sectors of the population, etc. have remained unaware of the ongoing developments in the scientific research (shown in green below) that run counter to the “official public health” narrative (shown in orange).
For more on this information trail and the sources of the blockages please see the post from March 11, 2023 on this site: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/archive
Clearly, those who launched, supported and policed the public health orders were operating on information that was provided via members of the corporate (BigPharma) backed Trusted News Initiative. Driving as many mRNA vax products into the arms of as many people as possible was the underlying motive for those with money to earn. Sadly, Pfizer & Moderna’s deceptive tactics were unknown to all well intentioned, caring and compassionate individuals who followed the “mainstream” media. Yet reports on these tactics, as well as on known regulatory capture (having CDC/FDA/etc. NOT DO INDEPENDENT SAFETY ASSESSMENT due to BigPharma influence) was known to all who were outside of the “mainstream media bubble.”
Please see other posts from March 2023 on the substack link shared above for more details on all of these topics if this content is new to you as the reader.
To provide the context for the current back and forth on whether/how to deal with these old charges it may help to read a letter sent to the judge who was asked to rule in the first case of Pastor Art Pawlowski. Reading this letter now, in early 2023, allows us all to see what information was KNOWN by the followers of evidence-based science over 18 months ago. This is information that someone of the stature of an Alberta Provincial Court judge appeared to be totally unaware of at the time. Due to the ongoing powers of censorship even today, the information that was shared at the time might still appear totally foreign to some readers.
The letter was written as a series of responses to statements made by the judge in question. Pastor Artur and a second person charged alongside of him are referred to in the letter by XXXX and YYYY. Frequent references are made to the Compilation of Letters, Articles and Research Evidence. At the time, it was a large PDF document which has since been posted here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io The various documents can be found by number following the table of contents included.
We are aware that you recently found both XXX and YYY in contempt of a court order.
Reading over the October 15, 2021 document entitled “Reasons for the Sanction Decision of the Honourable Justice SoandSo”, and noting your thought process with reference to these rulings, I am writing to share a Compilation of Letters, Articles and Research Evidence to give you additional information to consider in advance of future cases requiring your ruling on the matter of COVID-19 policies in this province.
As you indicated in your statements, XXX and YYY might have enjoyed goading you and others to set them up with jail time to draw more attention to their cause. It is not our place to dispute that.
However, as committed Christians they, along with people of all faith communities and spiritual traditions, have something in common—the need to put convictions into action, to speak out against injustice and oppression, to reach out to help where help is needed, as you most likely do too. The issue at hand is which information they and other like-minded people are acting on and which information you and our public health authorities are acting on.
People of faith, of conviction, of honour and integrity will often call upon governments to defend civil liberties and human rights and to strengthen the values such as diversity, tolerance, human dignity, and justice for all. In that vein, we invite you to review the attached Compilation entitled “Following the Science – Documenting the Current State of Affairs of COVID-19 vaccination in Canada” which has been compiled by a small circle of lay writers who have been closely “Following the Science” on this topic for quite some time. At the core of the document is a collection of well-referenced letters and articles as well as the associated links to audio interviews featuring leading academics and academic specialists physicians from the Universities of Alberta, Calgary, British Columbia, Saskatchewan and Guelph, alongside of highly credentialed data analysts, microbiologists from the USA, Germany and elsewhere.
While it must not appear to you that the individuals you have recently felt compelled to rule upon are people of honour, you must admit that they obviously hold strong convictions.
We too, in our personal lives have noted a strong clash of convictions between those acquaintances on both sides of this new divide in our society. On the one hand, there are those who are firm believers of government policies and mandates, trusting fervently in the science which they believe undergirds government policy. On the other, there are those who quote highly credentialed medical and academic specialists from a range of countries who have, at least since March 2021, been warning in no uncertain terms of the LACK of efficacy, necessity and safety of COVID-19 vaccination as per their observations of the data and the findings in the field. Those academic physicians from Alberta and British Columbia now face being sanctioned, much like XXX and YYY, for their fervent conviction that the answer to Alberta’s way OUT of the pandemic is NOT via additional vaccination.
Upon closer examination of the information provided by our Chief Medical Officer of Health and others who advise her, you may very likely come to understand that to advocate for the COVID-19 mitigation matters most at the forefront of provincial policy (that of wide-spread vaccination) is based on the well-intentioned work of scientific advisors who, apparently unbeknownst to them, are working with outdated information. The scientists on the ground, including the academics from our local Western Canadian universities, have a different tale to tell, the tale of vaccine-induced spike protein and its subsequent toxic effect on the human body. You will note that these dangers, which were already noted “out in the field” even more than seven months ago, and which are in fact driving the case counts, are (as far as we can ascertain from the outside) NOT MENTIONED in any of the references cited by those who advise our CMOH.
Paradoxically, this information is well-known OUTSIDE of the mainstream media and government circles. The Compilation also addresses issues around censorship which can help explain why large swaths of the public are actually NOT AWARE of information well-known in diverse, science minded pockets of the province.
To illustrate how paradigm-shifting the knowledge contained throughout this Compilation is, allow us to comment on a selection of statements that appeared in your “Reasons for Sanctions Decision” document (italics) We wish to direct you to specific contents within the Compilation to streamline your ease of access to the relevant information. (bold)
a. By DATE, this province was in what medical experts called the fourth wave of the pandemic. Ironically, XXX and YYY are being sanctioned at a time when the threat from COVID-19 has never been greater.→Please view the pieces in the Compilation which deal with the topic of vaccine uptake vs. vaccine status numbers to understand what is setting this 4th wave apart fromprevious waves: the breakthrough cases in the doubly vaccinated are “falling through the cracks” and misdiagnosed as first-time COVID-19 cases, which has a detrimental effect on recovery. Documents #14, 15 and 16 contain unanswered questions of government officials, re: case count numbers, etc. and, in their various reports within the Compilation certain academics and physicians confirm that vaccine “status” not “uptake” numbers are at the root of this issue.
It had been hoped that as this province opened for business during the summer of 2021, the worst was behind us; it has turned out to be the opposite. From the perspective of COVID-19, this province has been and is in its worst shape ever concurrently with these sanction hearings. It is not an overstatement that XXX and YYY have contributed to this ominous health situation by their defiance of the health rules and their public posturing, which encourages others to doubt the legitimacy of the pandemic and to disobey the provincial Health Orders designed to protect them.→When it comes to controversial health rules in general, please note that some of the voices profiled in the Key Contacts Document #2 will point to the harms of continued lockdowns. In particular, Dr. Bridle addresses the inefficacy of masking in references to his research. We have limited our focus in this document to the topic of vaccination only.
Presently most therapeutic surgeries have been cancelled. ICU units (despite emergency expansion) are overwhelmed.→On October 15, 2021 the Attorney General of Nebraska released a legal opinion that would effectively overrule those authorities within the state which are preventing physicians from prescribing two of the antiviral medications known for their safety and efficacy for the treatment of COVID-19. (https://ago.nebraska.gov/sites/ago.nebraska.gov/files/docs/opinions/21-017_0.pdf) One major way to help ensure hospital capacity is to provide safe and effective EARLY ANTIVIRAL TREATEMENT for COVID-19 on an outpatient basis – BEFORE patients reach the stage of illness that requires hospitalization. This was repeatedly accomplished with an 85+% quick recovery rate. Please see Document #5 and #39 to 43 in the compilation in which the preventative (prophylactic) usage as well as early treatment protocols involving ivermectin and/or hydroxychloroquine (aka “anti-virals” or IVM & HCQ) and other protocols. As well, the ICU bed count will only increase if the current practice of COVID-19 vaccination is pushed into even more of the population. Within 4-6 months of injection, the lack of efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines becomes obvious as doubly vaccinated patients end up making up more of the case count totals.
Notwithstanding the wide availability of statistically safe and statistically successful vaccinations against COVID-19, the impact on this province in terms of health, human suffering, and economic impact has never been worse. Paradoxically or perhaps statistically relevant, when we were fully locked down in March 2020 there were relatively few cases.→It is not usually stated, but the course of the illness had already progressed such that case counts were dropping when the lockdown started last March. The reason the case counts are so much higher now was hinted at in our previous comments. The spike protein that our cells are being taught to make to instruct the immune cells to fight the virus IS THE SAME spike protein that has now been shown conclusively to do the actual damage in a COVID-19 infection. Since the symptoms overlap, people assume we are seeing rising counts of the COVID-19 illness, when in fact what is rising is the COVID-19 pandemic 2.0 – a pandemic of the vaccinated with vaccine injuries that look like the illness. However, as long as the CDC’s guidelines on declaring vaccination status are followed, everyone vaccinated will count as “unvaccinated” during the entire time they are themost at risk for vaccine-induced injuries – from day 1 to day 14 after the injection, which completely “muddies the water “and prevents the vaccine-injured from accessing anti- coagulants and other therapeutics they would now need.
e. Today virtually everybody in this province knows at least one person that has died from COVID- 19 and many more that have experienced difficult illness and persistent symptomology.→With all due respect, Your Honour, this might be a stretch. With only 2731 people having died of or with COVID-19 since the start of the declared pandemic, we cannot say that virtually every resident of this province personally knows of someone who has died due to a COVID-19 infection. The majority of deaths fall within the groups of people who have multiple comorbidities, and from whom proven life-saving treatments have been withheld. In fact, COVID-19 accounts for just a small portion of the deaths that occur in our province on a regular basis. Please note that before COVID, there were 26,138 deaths in 2019.
From what we have been hearing, it is more likely that most people in this province who personally know of someone who has had vaccine injuries (This author can think of 5 who have confirmed their diverse recent medical issues, which started almost immediately after vaccination, as well as 6 for whom we strongly suspect a recent COVID-19 vaccination was the precipitating factor.)
 The position of the contemnors is that this is an inappropriate case for jail as both are otherwise law-abiding citizens who have become spokesmen for policies in opposition to the severity of the Health Orders.→While the recent resistance of XXX and YYY has been “aggravating” as you indicated elsewhere, AFTER having reviewed and understood the implications of the information in the attached PDF, you might even change your mind. One may well begin seeing any individuals who make use of their societal position and networks as valuable “whistleblowers,” courageous individuals who spare no risk and who, driven by conviction, feel called to issue warnings or push for change. Seen another way, these two men are doing what according to provincial Health and Safety Legislation every employer is to do...
employers [are required to] do everything they reasonably can to protect the health and safety of their employees. This includes..
informing your workers of all the health and safety hazards at the job site
investigating serious injuries and incidents
investigating potentially serious incidents
Conversely, Workers are responsible for:
protecting their own and others’ health and safety at or in the vicinity of the work site
cooperating with their employer or supervisor by following health and safety rules for
reporting health and safety concerns and conditions to their employer or supervisor
cooperating with any person exercising a duty under the OHS legislation
Given that XXX and YYY play are leaders within a Christian community, some of the comments that follow are being made from a Christian perspective. It can be assumed that XXX and YYY see themselves on par with teachers, lawyers, social service workers and any others whose “daily work” involves the well-being of the population in some way. (There are plenty of Biblical references to “workers in the field” such as “the workers are few” in the book of Matthew, chapter 9, verse 35.) Likewise, they may see themselves as colleagues of government employees such as those who implement the public health orders. In any case, worker or employer or not, they are likely feeling that speaking out against poorly thought out government policies is the BEST way to achieve much needed change. Please revisit this question after you have had time read about the spike protein damage etc. as described by Dr. Bridle and Dr. Bhakdi under “Key Voices” and/or “Key Contacts” (Documents #1 & 2) as well “Following the Science” (#5)
g. Breaches of these types of orders can have significant community impact. There are at least two subsets of these breaches. The first subset in this group are breaches of healthcare orders which could affect the health of innocent third parties.→This again is a case where government health policy advisors might wish to look to the ever-changing science and seek updated information on community transmission, etc. For a number of months it has been known among scientists in the field that banning gatherings of the unvaccinated while allowing the vaccinated to gather as they please will actually lead to GREATER transmission. This is because the vaccinated have now been shown to carry a greater viral load than the unvaccinated.
 The root of the problem is that these people challenge the authority of the courts in a public and community disruptive way and bring the administration of justice into disrespect. These breaches can be extremely challenging. No judge wants to imprison striking nurses or protesting priests, but as many judges have noted, we don’t get to pick and choose the orders we wish to obey and the ones we don’t. If this was permitted in a free and democratic society we would quickly disintegrate into a society where the rule of law was ignored.→While we agree that you as judges do not get to pick and choose which orders to enforce, perhaps by passing this document along to any contacts you may have in the various government departments, you can help to reach provincial, municipal and federal decisionmakers sooner rather than later such that the protesters and dissidents who are aware of current science in the field AND policy makers are ALL on the same page. In this way judges should end up with fewer such cases.
. From this it can be seen that the conduct of XXX and YYY was extremely aggravating. They engaged in both direct and public defiance of a court order designed to save people’s lives. → “Saving lives” has of course, been everyone’s goal since the start of the declared pandemic. Given the ongoing scientific advances in the field that point to the dangers and the lack of efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccines currently in use in Alberta, moving forward, one can no longer see the continuation of the policies still being enacted by the office of the CMOH as “saving people’s lives.” We call upon you in your position to share the information in this compilation as widely as possible within your circles. We have tried to get the attention of the Scientific Advisory Committee as well as of the deputy CMOH and the Health Minister and Deputy Minister here in the province as well as their federal counterparts but our attempts so far have not yet been effective.
Fundamental to this debate, which is roaring in this province and getting louder and louder as more and more people die, is that the person you kill may not be yourself. One medical doctor recently compared the rule breakers as someone who might drive impaired. Often when they crash it is innocent victims that suffer the injury.→What the recent findings show, unfortunately, is that those who have been injected with COVID-19 vaccines are now known to be MORE likely to be asymptomatic carriers of COVID-19 than the unvaccinated. So the “killer” may be the one who believes themselves to have “done the right thing” and who now should be “protected” but sadly, is more vulnerable. We realize this sounds counterintuitive, but the various academic letter writers profiled in the compilation address these newer findings in more detail.
 It is disappointing that XXX had to air his grievances about this province in another country. Leaders and statesmen don’t do that. During his sanction hearing, ...some trip reports [were played] in which XXX oozes hubris, while relishing in his notoriety. He got to take a picture with a governor of a U.S. state. He is proud of what he asserts is the love of the U.S. people for him. Love he implies he is not feeling in Canada.→We realize that in the eyes of those tasked with upholding laws such as these, the personality of this individual may be aggravating. However, this is the first time we have heard of that someone has been penalized for speaking freely outside of the country. Unfortunately, our province now has a certain degree of notoriety worldwide for its arrest and imprisonment of religious leaders for a disputed health matter. Anyone in the position of these pastors would have quite a reception if travelling to another country which prizes itself on freedom of speech, freedom of association, freedom of movement, freedom of religion, etc.
 He accuses the Court of being a “tool of the government.” In this regard, he shows no civic understanding of the independence of the Courts and their distance from the government.→In that a number of court decisions made recently in Canada (see Document #51) echo the policies of government, XXX and YYY may well be forgiven for assuming the courts are tied to the government. Given that the courts ARE independent of government, it is our hope that you will be able to look through the attached Compilation of Letters, Articles and Research Evidence to evaluate for yourself, whether the conclusions we have come to are correct. Namely that our Public Health Officials are setting policies based on OUTDATED scientific findings and that as such, they are NOT to be followed. We trust that you will understand the best ways to return our provincial policy making back within the realm of safety. In case you have not followed developments in Texas, please note that the governor of that state has put a temporary end to all vaccine mandates until the legislature has had a chance to review all of the newer scientific findings. It is our hope that such a ruling can be made here as well.
 He again describes health authorities as Nazis. XXX makes much virtue of his status in Canada as an immigrant from Poland. With this background he should understand how inappropriate it is to compare public health officials to a group that killed, by many accounts, four million Polish people, of which at least half were Jewish. It defies belief, that any immigrant from Poland (having studied the atrocities of the Nazis in that country) could identify a doctor of medicine trying to keep people alive as a Nazi. →With all respect to the millions of Jews who lost their lives to Nazi policies, what those who bring up the Nazi era nowadays are referring to, is the way in which the Nazi tyranny STARTED. We do not YET have the loss of millions of lives. But what we do have is the very clear beginnings of economic fascism defined in this way:
This close arrangement involving a “totalitarian public-private partnership where all policy, speech and expression, economic activity and production is controlled via a beneficial arrangement between government and a network of non-governmental organizations such as unions, think tanks, private corporations and ‘official’ charities” is the classic definition of fascism.
XXX and YYY would certainly be aware of the close ties between Big Pharma and the FDA, WHO, CDE etc. and of the phenomenon of regulatory capture and the many revolving door ties such that tie the regulators and the manufacturers so closely together as well as the many patents related to both the Corona virus and vaccines filed by the NIH even prior to December 2019. (See references by Dr. David Martin in Document #2 and consider following the links on topics such as the Fauci Dossier. Please see also # 70 regarding the overlap of investment funds between the various pharmaceutical, publication, media and other companies.
These entangled interconnections are further underlined in two videos we wish to recommend to you directly:
This one by “Women for Freedom” from the Netherlands entitled: “Who runs the World Blackrock & Vanguard.” Reposted on multiple sites, here on June 22, 2012
—> Note added on March 31, 2023 … Ahhh YouTube censors didn’t want its viewers to get this content. But it is now still visible here on the independent platform called Rumble: https://rumble.com/vo1gd7-who-runs-the-world-blackrock-and-vanguard.html
Along with this astounding 1 hour documentary that includes clips from a re-enactment featuring some of the writing of George Orwell juxtaposed against news clips from this past year. (Please see Monopoly, Who owns the world posted October 16, 2021 at https://odysee.com/@FreeYourMindAz:d/MonopolyWhoOwnsTheWorld:f?r=EzNbfM4gHx1Ctm7K1123 UUgE1QsG38ww ).
Having governments channel untold numbers of coerced customers towards the product lines of the medico pharma complex through legislated compliance that only serves to raise corporate profits, can definitely be understood by someone coming from Poland as moving toward a fascist state WEF (To hear directly from one of the “elites” mentioned in the Monopoly documentary, please see our Document #75)
At this point we wish to bring up the discussion regarding the Canada US free trade deal signed by then PM Brian Mulroney. It is evident that the door to corporate power-grabbing was beginning to be opened at that time as so aptly outlined by Linda McQuaig in her 2002 publication: All you can eat: greed, lust and the new capitalism. https://archive.org/details/allyoucaneatgree00mcqu
Fast forward a few decades to see to what extent these corporate behemoths have gone. This posting comes to us courtesy of the Hon. Brian Peckford, former Premier of Newfoundland and Labrador, who now in his 80s has observed from a very well-informed position at the “front-lines” and “in the line of fire” how corporate overreach has progressively grabbed a hold of democratically elected governments, mostly without their notice. Please see https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2021/10/20/leaked-contracts-reveal-pfizer-used-its-power-to-shift- risk-and-maximize-profits-in-negotiations-with-governments/
You, and most other Canadians, are likely unaware that our Finance Minister and Deputy Prime Minster, MP Chrystia Freeland, sits on the Board of Trustees at the World Economic Forum. So, if your two “rule breakers” vehemently insist and stridently warn everyone who has the ears to hear, of the dangers of fascism, we posit that they might be on to something that the rank and file in this country are choosing to be oblivious to. Our Deputy PM, a number of years before (we assume) her posting on that board at the WEF had already been in contact with many of these elites from the new global super-rich as interview subjects for her book:
This insightful quote resonates with us in particular:
Freeland, Chrystia PLUTOCRATS - THE RISE of the NEW GLOBAL SUPER-RICH and the FALL OF EVERYONE ELSE http://digamo.free.fr/pluto12.pdf reviewed here: https://www.erudit.org/en/journals/ri/2014-v69-n4-ri01666/1028117ar.pdf
“It is a measure of the financial and intellectual power of plutocrats in the world economy that their goal is to guide the state. Indeed, the muscle of the philanthro-capitalists is such that they can sometimes unintentionally distort the social safety nets of entire nations. ... Where things get really complicated is when the philanthro-capitalists use their money to finance a political agenda that dovetails with their personal business interests or with the interests of the plutocratic class as a whole.”
 XXXX is entitled to express views about the government, the Courts, and AHS, but he must do it in a respectful, hate-free way that does not breach Provincial Health Orders. He was not arrested because of his religion or his religious worship, or for his outlandish publicity seeking views. He was arrested for breaching a court order. During his court statement, he pointed out that the Premier of the province in the middle of the pandemic was observed dining with a group of other politicians and appearing not to obey the Provincial Health Orders. This gave him an opportunity to suggest that I should jail the Premier along with him and they could share the same cell. Again, I view this as part of XXXX’s fervent desire that I martyr him by giving him a little more jail time to add a little more gasoline to the anti-mask, antivaccination fire.→Perhaps, it would be helpful to let it be known whether those gathered on the rooftop restaurant were fined, and if the fine was paid out of government funds. Not hearing of any fine levied is what is particularly egregious to those who like XXXXX are pointing out what appears to be justice unfairly implemented. In today’s era, where an unvaccinated patron of a restaurant is not even allowed to sit alone in the cold air on a totally empty outdoor patio where there is no one to “spread a virus to” without being escorted away or threatened with a fine, we wonder where justice has gone.
 XXXX and YYYYY, and others that I dealt with in the sanction hearings are on the wrong side of science, history, and common sense on this issue.→We understand, given the nature of the limited uncensored information you have been able to access thus far, that this is your opinion. We posit that after reading the attached Compilation, you will see that, sadly it is our own government science advisors and thereby our own government officials who are on the wrong side of science. OR who at least, have a lot of catching up to do. Please see Document #5, as well as #9-15.
The growing number of dead and dying in North America from COVID-19 infection cannot be ignored, nor defined as a false reality.→Again, those who are aware of censors, science writers, government scientists and others keeping the truth about safe non-vaccine treatments from our government decisionmakers (and government decision makers relying solely on curated data sources instead of following the science on the field themselves) are to blame for the whole scale “withholding of the necessaries of life” for all of these patients who have died needless deaths. No one is denying the existence of COVID-19 as an illness. What the science in the field points to, is that many jurisdictions, ours included are so in love with modern technological solutions that old repurposed drugs seem not to even to be considered an option. Please refer to interviews with Dr. Peter McCullough listed in the Key Contacts document (#2).
XXXXXXX’s political lecture delivered to me in his sanction hearing was a cry for jail because he has observed that jail will add to his persona as a martyred Christian fighting the forces of government evil. →XXXXX is simply referencing the tools of his trade – Christians have long been jailed for expressing contrary views and trying to denounce evil where they see it.
In these upside-down times, when there is so much at stake, and when so much lip service is given to “evidence-based decision making” to witness that life and death decisions (i.e. in governments, in medical colleges, etc.) are made with OUTDATED science, information and interpretations that are FROZEN IN TIME while also rigorously perpetuated and defended is truly stunning. People like the XXXX and YYYYYY who have not approached this line of research, might be forgiven for thinking that today’s headlong drive into needless death and suffering must surely have pure evil at its core.
Faulty information or “errors in informing systems” just don’t seem plausible enough as reasons for this entire censorship of safe treatments and this headlong push for unsafe vaccinations and the resulting death and suffering. When one contemplates that since the start of the declared pandemic the world has welcomed 130 NEW billionaires, many of whom are in the pharma industry and now hold a net total value of $2.1 trillion (US) dollars, one may also add the love of the almighty dollar or basic human greed in certain circles as the root of all evil. In fact, to find this evil we could experiment with placing “the ubergeedy” in the space of “tyrants” or “tyranny” in this little-known quote by Albert Camus:
Pfizer alone is reported to be estimating $93 billion on projected vaccine sales for 2022, according to the folks at the Childrens’ Health Defense who have been keeping a close eye on Big Pharma for decades (and whose members make up some of the so-called “Disinformation Dozen,” a moniker made up for them by one particular Pharma-connected media thinktank. See some of the documents in the Media & Censorship section please, including #69 in which the even a cursory glance at the “Money Trail” points to collusion between ownership funds of the different “competing” brands of vaccines).
All of the well-intentioned, yet ill-informed decision makers, seeking to appease their conscience that they are indeed “doing something” and “playing their part” for the “good of all” by instituting vaccine mandates within the workplace are little aware of the actual impacts of such decisions. As well, they are little aware of how they, in turn are being used as servants (or tools) of the said tyrants, as means of ensuring a never-ending “captive” product market for the shareholders of these big tech and big pharma firms! A small example: Now the employers of all public servants, health care staff, educators, and otheremployee groups have determined that employees now “must” sign into technology platform “solutions” in order to declare their vaccination status such that “proof of vaccination mandates may be rolled out. These well-intentioned individuals, are then able to tell themselves that they have indeed “done something” while rather unaware of how each log in on these new tech solutions and each daily scan, just adds to the “ching ching” effect for some far away tech corporation - without even a hint of a fair selection process that could provide employment to local computer programmers, etc. We invite you once again, if you have not yet done so, to take the time to read Document #75 in the attached Compilation.
iv. He must remain in this province during his period of probation unless he obtains the consent of his probation officer who will authorize such temporary absences if they are for an emergency family or health matter. If he is not currently in this province, he must return within seven days and report in person to the probation office in (city) and thereafter as required by the probation office; and→With all due respect, we must have missed the part where you determine that the Charter right of “freedom of movement” or “mobility” needs to be removed from a citizen. Do we mandate that convicted child offenders be monitored in this type of way? If the point is to stop him from giving speeches overseas, this directive still does not preclude the use of Zoom, etc. You must admit this appears quite incomprehensible to someone just reviewing your line of thought for the first time.
v. The final term of his probation order will be that when he is exercising his right of free speech and speaking against provincial Health Orders and provincial health recommendations, in a public gathering or public forum (including electronic social media); he must indicate in his communications the following: “I am also aware that the views I am expressing to you on this occasion may not be views held by the majority of medical experts in this province. While I may disagree with them, I am obliged to inform you that the majority of medical experts favour social distancing, mask wearing, and avoiding large crowds to reduce the spread of COVID-19. Most medical experts also support participation in a vaccination program unless for a valid religious or medical reason you cannot be vaccinated. Vaccinations have been shown statistically to save lives and to reduce the severity of COVID-19 symptoms.”→No further comments on the actual content of this “assigned mandatory” message until you have had a chance to read over the documents in the Compilation of Letters, Articles and Research Evidence and can see for yourself what we mean when we point to science that has been “frozen in time.” Having to publicly denounce your own thoughts is anathema to what a liberal democracy is all about.
NOTE TO READER - if today in early 2023 your views on COVID matters more or less align with those written up by this judge in October of 2021, you have been a victim of corporate censorship as the world has definitely moved on. Science never stops. New findings regularly contradict and disprove old ones. Hopefully other posts in this series will point you to more up to date information - for the benefit of all in your circle…
Thanks for reading Followingthecovidscience’s Newsletter! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.