This is where we were a year ago
A "plain language" summary of the known (censored) science from November 2021 - as people were seeking exemptions from proof of vaccination mandates...Includes the "Information Trail" flowcharts
November 2021 I sent this message to contacts who had been reluctant to dig deeper into the numbers and information I had been sharing — well educated folks who remained skeptical, doubting the validity of reports I was linking to, while firmly believing the official “safe and effective” messaging we were all being inundated with.
Today, looking back at what I had written, it is like opening a time capsule seeing where we were 12 months ago…
When “vaccines” are not VACCINES
We now have more direct links to recently published (or at least accepted to pre-press servers) scientific studies compiled by experts in the field https://earlycovidcare.org/vaccinestudies/ This is a list of 28 studies, analyses etc. which (along with information I reference on my site) essentially state that the Pfizer/Moderna/J&J and AZ Covid-19 vaccines:
a) do not meet the criteria of vaccines (i.e. what is true for other regular previous vaccines cannot be assumed to apply to these products)
b) are NOT effective for the Delta variant as it is a few mutations away from the Wuhan variant upon which they were formulated, Their initial efficacy was strong for the first months only and wanes after about 4 to 6 months. (Apparently, knowing this in advance our gov has purchased enough vax for 8 doses per person.)
c) only target ONE of 28 proteins in the Sars-CoV-2 virus and do not build immunity stronger than that provided by those who actually HAD Covid or who are developing immunity naturally (I admit at first this seemed a little wonky and unscientific to me, but hearing from so many immunologists these past 6 months, I am even more amazed at God's intricacy as Creator, what astounding processes run beneath the surface of our bodies keeping most of His creatures safe from disease over the millennia.)
The 95% relative risk reduction number is only one metric, what is required reporting at the same time is ABSOLUTE risk reduction (a flip side in the calculation) but at 0.7% for Pfizer and 1.3% for Moderna that number was always left off of any reports from the manufacturers.) Also the study design in the initial trials was just copied from regular type vaccines but did not actually set out to determine safety related to this new unique DNA/RNA mechanism - you cannot test for something you are not purposely looking for.
Because of the various processes induced in the body through COVID vaccination, the VACCINATED carry a much greater VIRAL LOAD than the UNVACCINATED - while assuming themselves to be safe to others. The VACCINATED are unaware that they are more likely to be spreaders. So technically, all the rapid testing now underway for the UNvaccinated, to see if they carry COVID asymptomatically needs to be done to BOTH groups if one is really to follow science and not simply be discriminatory
Re: the third doses now being started up in BC and ONT, likely coming soon to AB - there is no evidence that they have been reconstituted for later variants although to hear science commentators talking they are assuming that has been done as per normal practice, in the case of flu shots for example. There have also been NO studies on the efficacy (or not) and safety (or not) of THREE doses in the same individuals. Once you understand the processes around spike protein damage, you can in NO GOOD CONSCIENCE advise anyone to go for a third assault on their system. (By contrast, natural immunity recognizes future variants.)
The spike protein generated by the patients due to the vaccination gets attacked by the body's immune cells. However they also attack the cells that MADE the spike protein and with each subsequent dosage, they will get better at it (i.e. will be more trained as to what to attack) this means MORE AUTOIMMUNE disorders as time goes by. This has been KNOWN in the field among the non-pharma connected specialists in immunology, virology, etc. by March/April 2021. By then published findings corroborated what many of the best learned and brightest in the field had suspected already last year and what they warned about in Feb/March). You can hear Dr. Pelech discuss this (at about the 50 minute mark on this informative video https://strongandfreecanada.org/iron-will/7646/ )
AHS follows the CDC guidelines and CALLS everyone who has not yet had 14 days go by since their vaccination "UNVACCINATED" and ditto for the second set of 14 days as "Partially vaccinated" THIS IS TRUE and has been confirmed by AHS. (Some of you had questioned me about this at the time. ) I guess this explains how they can with a straight face keep saying that the majority of cases in hospital are UNvaccinated (by that definition, called vaccine status) But by the definition of vaccine uptake (i.e. got the vax in the system) one can no longer say that the majority in hospital are UNVAXed. In fact in Israel, the UK and other places where they use vaccine uptake numbers, it is the vaccinated who make up the majority of the cases. ALSO because spike protein damage engineers the same kinds of issues as actual COVID, the symptoms look the same.
Those countries that actually let all who are at risk (health care workers, family of the ill, nursing home patients etc.) take hydroxychloroquine and/or ivermectin, preventatively have way lower COVID rates. Even in a nursing home where two wards got IVM for scabies, the people on those wards were spared from COVID which did spread in the same home in other wards. But there is a big push from big pharma to make reports of those successes disappear since the whole basis for emergency use authorizations is that there is NO OTHER ALTERNATIVE. Nowadays with media ownership pretty much identical to pharma investment and major outlets like the CBC signed on to "Truth in Journalism" types of initiatives alongside of Facebook, Google, etc. (vaccine investors) there has been a complete blockage of news around the success of non- “vaccine” treatment for COVID-19.
The CDC has confirmed that ONLY 4% of all "COVID-19 deaths" have died from ONLY COVID. ALL the rest of the folks who died from COVID-19 died from a COVID-19 PLUS SOMETHING ELSE (i.e. one or most often more comorbidities....)
The numbers of "cases" are being driven by an artificially highly set number of test cycles in the PCR Tests. It is the equivalent of declaring I have a fever at different temperatures in different places. PCR testing set at 44+ cycles catches a bunch more fragments in its net (fragments which btw are not even infectious) whereas testing set at around 24 cycles only catches cases which are actually infectious. Our Governments have NOT ever come clean on how many cycles labs here are using to test for "cases" and to top it off, current guidelines by the CDC are to run test samples from the "vaccinated" who present with symptoms at a lower rate (28) than the UNVACCINATED whose samples need to be run at about 44 cycles -- Is it no wonder that suddenly there are so many more "cases" among the younger under 12 segment? Kids are not getting sicker faster suddenly now. It is just that as the unvaccinated, their tests are run much further, so they end up showing as "cases" of the apparently "asymptomatic" type at a higher rate than those being tested among the vaccinated which is the majority of adults. What a way to skew test results. The fact that PCR tests are supposed to be replaced as of Jan 1 with something that can actually distinguish between flu, COVID and other infections is telling - the PCR can't tell the difference between any of these, it is just set to find fragments regardless of how old, how infectious etc.
When Information Flows are Blocked
FINALLY and this is my contribution to the discussion, a careful scan of even the latest (i.e. Sept 6 and Sept 28 2021) documentation written by Science Advisory Groups (SAG for Alberta and NACI federally) shows it is OLD research:
a) References to documents from other provinces are recycled in which references to the WHO and CDC are recycled... so that as late as Sept 28 the myth is being promulgated that COVID vaccination is safe, effective and necessary (and now also mailed to all households in Alberta). [For a home-made video rebuttal specifially on the mailout from AHS to Alberta households please see the two-part November 14 video here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page14.html, 5 blocks from the top.]
b) But there is NO CURRENT PROOF of any of these assertions. What is being cited is either outdated, or reflects the surface level 'findings' that some study authors state in their summary in polite and optimistic terms (to get published) when a close look at the data in their papers actually tells a different story.
c) I tried to map out the flow of information and unless I want to believe in evil manipulation, it now seems very obvious to me that in July 2021 when Dr. Hinshaw submitted her affidavit to court, she swore having included all the latest information to the best of her ability.... that SHE DID NOT KNOW SHE DID NOT KNOW the whole story.
Likely Dr. Hinshaw (as the Government Policy Maker on this flowchart) had heard that a few other people "have a different opinion" and was led to believe that they were simply misinformed or willfully spreading ‘misinformation.’ This view would have let her ignore all data that contracted that which she had been provided. There has been so much active defamation of the truth tellers, the actual scientists on the bench, doing the findings, such that Dr. Hinshaw (and others who believe themselves to be intelligent and well informed) have been considering those voices as solitary, misguided, even as Trump supporters, etc. voices to be silenced. This INSTEAD of realizing that the "experts" (science writers and government science advisors) they are listening to are actually the ones who are misinformed.
We need to remember that the entire history of key scientific findings came about through those who (often bitterly) had to fight against the prevailing views. This is no different.
Those maligned as "misinformers" will one day regain their rightful reputations as courageous truth tellers.
Below you see the Official (and outdated) Information making its way to the Policy Makers while they are in the dark about much of the science in the field - science which is making its way through sections of the population via alternate media and old-fashioned means like letters!!! (I am skipping a few steps see the whole process here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1635738508414.pdf from page 14).
The irony though, is that employers of the university academic physicians, research scientists, etc. hearing the official (outdated misinformed) government version, believe that what their employees are talking about IS MISINFORMATION and are now laying off, or decertifying the very individuals who are driving the actual research in the field.
Some of those scientists I have profiled here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Voices_from_the_Field_8pg.pdf as part of my website https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/. See the Table of Contents to the compilation entitled Following the Science - Documenting the Current State of Affairs of COVID-19 Vaccination in Canada as of October 21, 2021 for more aspects of this multifaceted matter.
Countering MANDATES based on SCIENCE FROZEN IN TIME
With various proof of vaccination mandates making their way through provincial and federal civil servants, AHS employees, teachers, police, transit, firefighters, I imagine many people are turning to pastors to ask for religious exemptions — people who know in their guts that adding 2 new assaults onto their bodies can't be good especially if they are of fragile health, dealing with chronic illnesses, etc,
Given that the College of Physicians and Surgeons is also following this outdated Frozen in Time science and has effectively blocked doctors from giving a medical exemption, for many the religious exemption is the only way open.
Yet people also realized that in asking for an exemption from a policy they consider invalid, they actually validate the policy.
Some churches that do provide religious exemptions use the 'keeping the temple of the Lord holy' angle for their letters. I do know that pastors who have not really understood the mechanisms by which spike protein actually damages the body on a micro level (which can lead to larger clots that paralyze and kill) etc. etc. will find it hard to write a convincing exemption letter anyway.
So I came up with a sample, written from the point of view of a pastor who may not exactly share a parishioner's view yet, but who is nonetheless putting it out there as something worth valid consideration given today's science.
The resulting document could be used by a pastor who is willing to point the employer to the Oct 30 list of recent research studies summarizing the current understanding among non-pharma funded high level immunologists, epidemiologists, cardiologists, professors of medicine, ER and internal medicine physicians etc. at Harvard, Yale, etc. etc. This proposed letter can be found on page 5 of this document: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1640840497466.pdf
May the spirt of peace, discernment and understanding be upon you as you sift through the attached links and materials in order to inform yourselves further on these very much “life & death” matters.
:-)
hannah