There should be NO DENYING the cold hard facts to move forward now
Comparing two approaches to difficult data: that of Prof. Tim. Caulfield vs that of Dr. William Makis
So, the facts before us at the end of 2023 are very difficult to face:
the Covid-19 vaccine products were NOT safe, NOT effective
there are millions of people whose disabilities and death are now proven to be linked to the actions of various components of the Covid-19 vaccine products within their bodies
the Covid-19 illness could have been safely and effectively treated had there not been a concerted effort to HIDE the existence of effective anti-viral therapeutics
Canada’s death count has RISEN not FALLEN post vax rollout
There are those who face these facts and encourage the rest of us to face them too.
And then there are those who wear blinders to the truth and continue denying the facts as “misinformation” “conspiracy theories” “drivel” “nonsense” and more of the like.
LET US REMOVE THE BLINDERS and FACE THE FACTS!
Today in my Twitter feed, I was faced with these two contradictory approaches to the state of Covid related news. Two Covid news related posts —
One post: By University of Alberta Professor Timothy Caulfield who holds the post of Professor, Faculty of Law and School of Public Health and that of Research Director, Health Law Institute and who typically tweets out memes, graphics or news reports that skim over the surface of published research.
Another post: By Dr. William Makis with previous experience as Director of the Nuclear Medicine program in the Brandon Health Authority; Nuclear Medicine Physician, Clinical Lecturer Department of Radiology at the University of Manitoba followed by 10 years of experience in Alberta with responsibilities as Nuclear Medicine Oncologist, PET/CT lead, Theranostics Expert, Neuroendocrine Tumor Group at the Cross Cancer Institute and as Assistant Clinical Professor, Department of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging at the University of Alberta while also holding a full-time contract to Alberta Health Services as Nuclear Medicine Radiologist and Oncologist.
Professor Caulfield’s post is telling me that because two studies appear to indicate that post-vax cardiac events in a small population of people aged 1 to 40 did NOT significantly climb by December 2022 that it is MISINFORMATION to state that increased reports of Sudden Adult Death Syndrome could be related to the Covid-19 vaccine products. Prof Caulfield ignores for example this statement by the study’s author’s :
Cardiovascular complications have been identified as consequences of COVID-19 infection and COVID-19 vaccines.1,2Sun et al3 showed an increase of >25% in cardiac arrest/acute coronary syndrome emergency calls in the 16- to 39-year-old population during January to May 2021, and they found a significant association with the rates of first and second vaccine doses.
He is not seeking further data as to the role a 3rd and 4th injection has been playing in increased all cause mortality or in any of the cases of vaccine harm mentioned in many other publications. Instead, he circulated this statement:
As a reader, I am to disbelieve statements made by someone like Dr. Makis with proven experience in research, teaching, leadership and plenty of clinical practice in a highly complex and specialized medical field and instead trust the word of a Professor untrained in a medical field.
Prof. Caulfield’s publications appear quite popular in the “popular press” with titles such as:
Given the 2017 publication date of his book on Vaccination, it would NOT have had a focus on the mRNA platform used for the Covid-19 vaccine products that started appearing at the end of 2019. In 2017 he would have promoted the safety of traditional vaccines.
One would think though, with the massive uptick in reports to vacinne databases like VAERS, DMED, Eudravigilance, the UK’s Green Card system and even Canada’s system for reporting vaccine injuries, via one’s doctor or individually, that as a scholar and research director, Prof. Caulfield would have been one of the first to start investigating these reports with a critical eye. Sadly, that has not happened. When reports like these circulated, Prof. Caulfield remained silent.
https://twitter.com/DeepBlueCrypto/status/1605080537122902017
Or as Dr. Byram Bridle, one of Canada’s most vocal immunologists and vaccinologists has pointed out, Prof Caulfield responds in quite an unprofessional manner to reports that would counter the “safe and effective Covid vaccine” stance.
Compiling and Facing Facts
Turning now to today’s post by Dr. Makis - this clear-eyed, dispassionate summation of Canadian Covid-19 illness and Vaccine data provides us with the facts upon which to move forward.
Lobby efforts to politicians, letters to physicians, pharmacists, medical clinics, medical colleges, media, etc. will find more MEAT to refer to in Dr. Makis’ post than in anything Covid related we are seeing from our local Health Law professor.
The following was shared from Dr. Makis’ Twitter account with his permission. Note that with screen captures the blue hyperlinks will not be active.
Readers NOT on Twitter are invited to follow Dr. Makis on his substack where the information below appears in full
A seven day free trial subscription only requires an email address. Many Substack readers set up a separate email address for the purpose of staying up to date without needing to submit their primary email address. A longer term subscription can be had for $5 a month - a way to allow researchers like Dr. Makis to have paid time to do their work of informing the public, something that those employed academically or journalistically should be doing but appear unwilling to do.
As we move into 2024, let us look at these facts straight on:
No more Denialism PLEASE!!
!
Thank-you for your post. As the New Year starts, I also feel we have made little headway in important areas with the pandemic. I also see the social and political divide in this country growing, as in many countries. I see the censorship of medical information grow. I see that many Canadians also have no clue about the National Citizen's Inquiry. I honestly think something is not right. There is little truth and transparency. There has been great economic upheaval. People's health is declining. The life expectancy is going down. There are more deaths in the last few years. The World Health Organization is wanting more or total say in public health. What is going on?