The missing FIRST RUNGS of the Ladder
The missing FIRST RUNGS of the Ladder
Answers to questions from those now hearing what the media kept quiet
It’s January 2024 - FOUR years after some of us started following the Covid science back in 2020. And now, finally, some people are starting to notice that all is not well with the Covid narrative they have been hearing nearly non-stop all this time.
IF they turn to us, we who have been following the science this whole time have a veritable library of information in our heads, it is hard to know where to start sharing. We might start with “we all know that the vaccines are not safe and not effective” but to someone new to the information, this jump is too large.
Just like when judges “take judicial notice” in court cases, not opening up for review on facts they believe to be well established, we too might jump too far believing everyone knows that what we know is already known knowledge.
We need to accept that our public-health-following friends are now irritated when we make reference to what we know to be well-established facts - without sharing the actual scientific references to each of the statements about the harms caused by mRNA vaccine products.
I am grateful to a “public-health-following” science minded friend who recently shared this analogy:
“You have climbed up way higher on the ladder of what you claim to have evidence for than I have. I can’t join you up there until you show me the the evidence for the claims way down on the bottom rungs of the ladder.”
Image source: Dreamstime.com
Show me the studies that were done that prove:
1) The mRNA instructions and the spike protein do NOT simply dissipate or break down within days as per basic science around how amino acids work.
2) If you are saying that the spike protein is in some way different from SARS-CoV-2 virus spike protein, show how your scientists have proven the difference and what effect this has because naturally, they should simply break down.
3) If you are saying that someone may have died suddenly six months after receiving the injection, why is it that they did not feel ill from the side effects of the vaccine all that time?
4) Since you are talking about a connection between spike protein and adrenaline, and sudden death show me the study that was done to prove that connection. Was it done in lab rats? When? With what results?
5) So if you talk about a pathologist’s slide showing a lot of spike protein in a tissue sample, explain how the presence of that spike protein would have lead to a death.
What I am looking for is the basic science where someone has done the research and published the study, essentially proving the harm. Only then when the first rung of the ladder has been clearly shown, can I ever follow you up to all the other stuff you are taking about.
The above “rungs” belong to the ladder showing this overarching CLAIM I had been trying to convince him of:
The major mRNA based Covid-19 vaccine products are NOT safe and effective. There are MANY “pathways of harm”. The pathogenesis of vaccine injury syndromes is believed to be driven by accumulation of spike protein in cells, tissues, and organs. Other causes of harm are driven by the inflammatory nature of lipid nanoparticles, the issues with plasmid DNA, the actions of PEG and other vaccine components….
How Scientific Knowledge grows and develops
Before stepping up to that first “rung”, let us briefly look at the “foundation” the “ladder” is standing on - SCIENCE!
So while my science friend is looking for published studies as a primary method of scientific evidence for claims, we can also recognize that expert peer commentary based on observations working toward the support of continually evolving hypotheses is also a big part of scientific evidence, often being worked out in back and forth conversations, presentations, joint brainstorming, etc. among many scientists with different areas of expertise before anything is officially published.
So here are some of the step by step answers to the questions raised above, with links to references that can be examined in more detail by those so inclined.
What have we learned about Spike Protein longevity?
First, we learn that researchers distinguish between the “wild” spike (the version that is part of the SARS-CoV-2 virus) and “recombinant” spike which is what the Covid-19 vaccine products generate within the body. We learn that “mRNA-based vaccines consist of injectable solutions of mRNA encoding for a recombinant Spike, which is distinguishable from the wild-type protein due to specific amino acid variations introduced to maintain the protein in a prefused state.? This Italian study of 20 injected and 20 uninfected test subjects looked at possible differences in “enzymatic digestion” of the two types of spike protein. My science friend was operating under the assumption that the vaccine-induced spike protein gets broken down (or digested by enzymes) in the same way as “regular” spike protein. Citing the abstract, we learn that
“Mass spectrometry examination of biological samples was used to detect the presence of specific fragments of recombinant Spike protein in subjects who received mRNA-based vaccines. and that The specific PP-Spike fragment was found in 50% of the biological samples analyzed, and its presence was independent of the SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibody titer. The minimum and maximum time at which PP-Spike was detected after vaccination was 69 and 187 days, respectively. The presented method allows to evaluate the half-life of the Spike protein molecule “PP” and to consider the risks or benefits in continuing to administer additional booster doses of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. This approach is of valuable support to complement antibody level monitoring and represents the first proteomic detection of recombinant Spike in vaccinated subjects
In other words, vaccine generated spike protein can remain present (undigested) in the body from 3 to 6 months post injection whereas the spike protein that is part of the virus that causes Covid-19 illness (i.e. the various variants of SARS-CoV-2) dissipates much more quickly.
A recent publication based on an extensive review of published literature to date IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein includes these remarks:
emerging evidence suggests that the reported increase in IgG4 levels detected after repeated vaccination with the mRNA vaccines may not be a protective mechanism; rather, it constitutes an immune tolerance mechanism to the spike protein that could promote unopposed SARS-CoV2 infection and replication by suppressing natural antiviral responses. Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals. (from the Abstract)
Although they can induce significant neutralizing anti-spike IgG and IgA responses, all three anti-COVID-19 vaccines: Pfizer, Moderna, and Astra Zeneca ChAdOx1, (Cambridge, UK) appeared to be only transiently protective against SARS-CoV-2 infection and transmission [10,11,12,13]. The high rate of breakthrough infections brought on by the Omicron variant suggests that the sterilizing protection offered by the existing immunization schedules is minimal [14]. There are several evasion strategies that SARS-CoV-2 uses to elude immunological monitoring and attack, including the impairment of interferon synthesis [15,16,17,18,19,20], disruption in antigen presentation [21,22], evasion of humoral attack by constructing nanotubes [23,24], and induced lymphopenia through syncytia formation [25,26,27].
Lethal COVID-19 cases have been linked to higher levels of IgG4 antibodies [28,29], and it has also been documented that mRNA vaccines trigger their synthesis [30,31]. It is, therefore, important to analyze this issue in depth. In this paper, we provide the scientific rationale suggesting that repeated vaccination with mRNA vaccines could generate an immune tolerance mechanism, thereby favoring unopposed SARS-CoV-2 replication. The long-term consequence of this tolerance could be the establishment of a permissive state of the host leading to chronic infection and other unintended consequences induced by mRNA vaccination in susceptible individuals.
In his article “ Half of Vaccinated People Never Stop Producing Spike Protein, Study Found - COVID Vaccine is a GIFT THAT KEEPS ON GIVING” mathematician & commentator Igor Chudov presents: “A clever scientific study by Brogna et al., just published, detected the presence of spike protein in COVID-vaccinated people six MONTHS after vaccination - and excluded the possibility of cross-contamination of experimental data with wild-circulating COVID infections.”
Since that study ended after 6 months, the potential exists that vaccine derived spike protein lasts even longer.
Igor Chudov then introduces this study which shows that boosted people are the slowest to clear Covid symptoms. He had written about the implications of that study in June 2022 already.
Now he writes:
“The Brogna et al. study that we are discussing shows us the mechanism of why immune tolerance to spike protein develops. The reason is that spike protein, produced without end, looks like an “environmental irritant” to the vaccinated organism instead of being seen as a dangerous intruder. … I greatly appreciate the painstaking and difficult work of Brogna and co-authors, who carefully examined the presence of spike protein in vaccinated people, properly used control subjects to rule out COVID-19 as an alternative cause, and so on.
I do not appreciate the “Covid science,” which lied about COVID vaccines being “safe and effective.” As we enter our ninth wave of Covid, and vaccinated people are infected and reinfected, the vaccines proved ineffective. Worse, they also turned out to be unsafe, as this study and many other studies show.”
What has been learned about spike protein and the circulatory system?
This research done on hamsters and published in March of 2021 showed how spike protein exacerbates endothelial cell (EC) function via ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) 2 downregulation and mitochondrial impairment. In many countries, employers began mandating the injections six months AFTER this information became published. Many more publications followed.
A number of those were included in this directory of over 1000 articles assembled by the community at CovidVaccineInjuries.com.
Yet another study, published in 2023 was recently summarized by Dr. Mark Trozzi here. The topic is the role of sialylated glycan and the relative lack of ACE 2 receptors in the walls of the blood vessels (endothelium) and in blood platelets.
What is known about Spike Protein in the brain?
Dr. Syed Been is a medical lecturer who makes it his business to take recently published studies and elucidate them to medical students and professionals world wide using his signature cartooning to make the concepts come alive.
His video notes in this recording, for example, include the URLs to eight associated peer reviewed publications or preprint articles. For more of his lectures, readers can go to: https://www.youtube.com/@DrBeenMedicalLectures
What have we learned about Sudden Death and no previous known symptoms?
Imagine an eavestrough slowly filling up with falling leaves. For most of the fall, rainwater is still able to make its way through in an apparently normally functioning manner. Then, over night, perhaps after a large windstorm, suddenly, the eavestrough is too full of leaves such that the water is blocked and flows over the edges, prompting the home owner to get up on the ladder to clean things out.
Likewise, among the forty (33 male) injected patients included in this study out of Hong Kong, twenty-nine (73%) patients were asymptomatic, and yet 31 patients (78%) had ST-segment or T-wave abnormalities in their ECG results. One might have suspected cardiac issues in the 7 (18%) who reported noncardiac chest pain, or the 3 (8%) who reported palpitations, or even the 1 (3%) who reported fatigue during follow-up. But it was only because the study included post-injection follow up that the fully asymptomatic patients became aware of what was happening beneath the surface. The implication of this is that anyone previously injected with any of the Covid-19 vaccine/booster products should at the very least, have some kind of cardiac testing as a followup. Similarly, some people diagnosed with stage 4 cancer had no idea for most of the time leading up to the diagnosis that they were walking around with adverse events below the surface. So it is very possible to be feeling well and having no idea of the adverse events developing within.
What have we learned about interactions between Spike Protein & Adrenaline?
Right from the get-go, back in early 2021, Dr. Byram Bridle revealed the Pfizer bio distribution study that had been requested by the government of Japan. Dr. Jessica Rose summarized it in 2022. It essentially showed that far from staying near the injection site, lipid nanoparticles (LNPs, the carrier for the mRNA) typically concentrated in the liver, spleen and adrenals (and ovaries) within 48 hours post injection. This would mean that cells in those organs would be subjected to instructions for the making of spike protein. Given that immune cells not only attack spike protein but also the cells that produced the spike protein (i.e. that are still holding on to their creations), the implication here is that these organs are being attacked by the body itself. A classic case of autoimmunity.
COVID-19 injection-induced sudden death during sleep is due to adrenaline surges that occur at night and is perhaps exacerbated by Adrenaline Dysautonomia (AD)2. The adrenaline surge (or rush) results in cardiac arrest due to underlying heart damage. This heart damage is due to scar tissue formed in the myocardium (and pericardium) induced by the immune responses to the foreign proteins lodged there as a result of the shots. A terrible cycle.
I also think sudden deaths might be linked to adrenaline dysautonomia arising due to infiltration of massive quantities of LNPs (and subsequent foreign protein production) in the adrenal glands, perhaps leading to overactive adrenals.3
… adrenaline surges push the circulatory system to a point where underlying heart damages prevent normal functioning, thus potentially can lead to cardiac arrest. Nobody wants that. So don’t run for a bit.
This is why some people who got the shots are experiencing cardiac arrests during runs. The shots mediate heart scarring via immunological damage and repair/wound healing mechanisms. The scarred heart (scars are the result of wound healing) cannot ‘properly’ endure the pressures imposed by adrenaline surges on the vasculature, ie: systemic vasoconstriction. The heart stops pumping effectively. The heart stops.
These adrenaline surges are normal due to the effects of exercise, for example, but heart scarring is not normal, especially in children, no matter what the CDC says.
What are we learning from the pathologists?
Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Arnie Burkhard have presented histological slides showing many organs of the deceased filled with spike protein. Unfortunately, Dr. Burkhardt’s only publications on an internationally recognized database of scientific publications (PubMed) date back pre-Covid. But, before his death earlier this year, he was able to present the autopsy findings he and others analyzed on 30 people to the participants at the “Understanding ‘Vaccine’ Causation conference held by the World Council for Health in February, 2023. A transcript of his talk is provided, allowing those who prefer reading to skim the contents much faster.
Dr. Michael Palmer provided this presentation on the various autopsy slides, explaining how, for example, they can show collapsed blood vessels and ruptured arteries. This would result less from an accumulation of spike protein themselves but from the body’s own immune cell response, coming to attack the developing spike protein as well as the cells that construct them. When masses of blood vessel lining cells are damaged or removed, the vessels (arteries, capillaries, etc. ) collapse.
What are we learning about reduced immunity among the multiply injected?
In addition to work shown in the studies referenced on this topic in an earlier section on spike protein longevity, more attention is being paid to the topic of how repeated injections of COVID-19 vaccines are leading to autoimmune conditions. Canadian computational biologist Dr. Jessica Rose explained this paper written three months ago to her online audience: “Class switch towards non-inflammatory, spike-specific IgG4 antibodies after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination”, Science Immunology December 22, 2022. The immune systems of people who have been repeatedly injected with the modified mRNA COVID-19 injectable products are being tricked into TOLERATING instead of COMBATTING the harmful spike protein (the component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus most responsible for the inflammation of COVID-19). She writes: “a pool of antibodies associated with spike-specific tolerance are dominant in multiply-injected people. … This was a ‘whoa there’s a 48,075% increase in spike-specific antibodies between the 2nd and 3rd injections’ situation.” Dr. Rose explains that organ tissue scarring is the result of what she is referring to a new “dis-ease”; that it flare up and go into remission; that serum IgG4 concentrations are elevated in the acute phases and that just like with COVID-19, steroids can be a helpful treatment.
What about some of the other pathways of harm?
This particular academic paper proposes a way to better assess the potential impacts of mRNA injections during pregnancy. Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Potential Impact on Fetal and Neonatal Development
Its authors discuss the Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) in the COVID-19 mRNA Vaccines. These are comprised of ionizable cationic lipids, phospholipids, cholesterol and polyethylene glycols (PEGs). The authors wrote:
Concerns were raised years ago regarding the safety of LNPs due to their biodistribution. For example, they were found to disperse to the ovaries in experimental mice [19]. Pfizer’s own pharmacokinetic studies of a surrogate vaccine containing ALC0315 and ALC0159 LNPs demonstrated that they dispersed over a 48 hours period to many rat endocrine and immune organs including the ovaries, adrenals, bone marrow, liver and spleen [20]. Very little is known about how LNP particle components are metabolized by the human body. Thus, further research must be completed, or information on studies from the companies that manufacture LNP components must be made available on Safety Data Sheets to indicate how these LNPs degrade into smaller catabolites. Research must also be conducted into how LNP components and their catabolites are distributed, retained and excreted. A critical component of the LNPs in both mRNA vaccines is the pegylated lipid,
The authors present data from case studies involving retinal detachment following both Moderna & Pfizer mRNA injection - bringing up mouse studies connecting components of PEG to precisely this result. They also discuss activation of the innate immune system, when “phagocytic cells (i.e., dendritic cells, macrophages, Kupffer cells, monocytes, mast cells and granulocytes) come into contact with LNPs, which are recognized as danger signals by host cell toll-like receptors (TLRs)” which leads to “the induction and release of abnormally high levels of pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines, referred to as cytokine release syndrome”. They also report on a pre-print study in which different doses of lipid nanoparticles (with and without mRNA) led to various adverse events in mice, including death. Their recommendations include further study in larger mammals, particularly in cattle in order to better understand the inflammatory nature of lipid nanoparticles and their potential for use as adjuvants in vaccines destined for humans.
Also on the topic of the injection of women is this conversation between Dr. Naomi Wolf and Igor Chudov on declining fertility rates.
When the Canadian National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) published its recommendation for Omicron booster shots in April 2023, the Canadian Covid Care Alliance provided this review in response:
This CCCA review report complements the earlier video presentations by Deanna McLeod where she provides an overview of the flaws in the study used to make these recommendations and provides readers with tools to make informed health choices.
…
Summing it All Up
This fall Public Health, under the counsel of NACI, promoted the Omicron BA.4/5 boosters to the general public as safe and effective. These recommendations were based on outcomes from a study of a different genetic injection, the BA.1 booster, that was rife with flaws. This non-RCT study asked the wrong question, assessed the wrong end-point, incorrectly interpreted effectiveness and misrepresented safety. There is also a concerning degree of conflicted interest at play in the COVID-19 guideline process.
But wasn't Covid so dangerous that the risk of harming some was less important than all the lives being saved?
Ah, the perennial lifeboat question, don’t we need to throw some folks off the boat in order to save others? This question ignores a few key factors, firstly that Covid-19 really was NOT as deadly as reported. And secondly that there was (and continues to be) safe and effective early treatment that is still officially off the table in many countries, including ours.
In response to my claim that Covid is not as deadly as you might think and that the high increase in sudden, unexpected deaths should be pinned on Covid mRNA shots, this friend thinks I am missing a more likely cause: COVID itself. Assuming COVID-19 is such a deadly disease, why don’t I just assume the increase in all-cause mortality is easily attributable to spikes in COVID? ) This study by Dr. John Ioannidis from 2021 showed that: Most locations probably have an infection fatality rate less than 0.20% and with appropriate, precise non-pharmacological measures that selectively try to protect high-risk vulnerable populations and settings, the infection fatality rate may be brought even lower.
In other words, COVID itself is much less of a killer than we were led to believe. There is much more on the creation of psy-ops, mis/dis/mal information and propoganda to be shared here, but I am choosing now to move to….
CONTINUALLY EVOLVING QUESTIONS
Recent observations and studies provide evidence on new issues needing attention and driving discussions that were not yet on the radar when my friend posed those earlier questions.
What are we currently learning about DNA contamination in the mRNA vaccines?
On October 9, 2023 a notice for a public hearing on the potential consequences of Kevin McKernan’s finding of DNA contamination was posted. Canadian scientist Dr. David Speicher followed up with the revelation that Canadian vials of mRNA vaccines are also contaminated. As Dr. Byram Bridle wrote:
The results of Dr. Speicher’s research are profound. He generated the largest data set to date on this topic, using vials from multiple Canadian batches of both the Pfizer and Moderna shots. Every single one was contaminated with bacterial DNA. He also confirmed the presence of the SV40 enhancer sequence in the contaminating DNA in Pfizer’s Canadian vials. And this is hot off the press: he is the first to test a batch of Moderna’s newest booster COVID-19 shot; it was also contaminated, although Moderna’s bacterial DNA does not contain the genetic sequence from SV40.
Dr. Bridle goes on to explain the implications of Health Canada’s admission they had been aware of Pfizer’s misrepresentation regarding the presence of simian vacuolating virus 40. The connection between SV40 and cancer is well known.
What are we currently learning about Vaccine Decoding Errors?
Igor Chudov also recently introduced this study in (of all places) Nature Magazine which explains how frequently mRNA Covid vaccines are now known to have a “frame-shifting” effect resulting in “junk proteins.” He explains the phenomena so well, please read his post:
Dr. Naomi Wolf, editor of The Pfizer Papers, added to Igor Chudov’s explanation of how uridine used in the original mRNA platform was replaced by pseudouridine to better bypass the immune system.
My sources were a December 6 2023 article in the peer-reviewed journal Nature.com, “N1-Methylpseudouridylation of mRNA Causes +1 Ribosomal Frameshifting,” (Thomas E Mulroney, et al), as well as an earlier report by the WarRoom/DailyClout Pfizer Documents Research Team. The sources for that report were the Pfizer internal documents released by the FDA under court order. On May 11, 2022, DailyClout had published “Report 22: Effects of N1-Methyl-Pseudouridine in the Pfizer MRNA Vaccine,” linking drectly to the Pfizer documents. (Source)
What are we learning about BigTech Censorship?
That it is very real in our day and age.
One day after reporting on the Frame-Shifting abilities and pseudouridine, all of the Daily Clout work was removed from Naomi Wolf’s Facebook page. (See what she writes about Mark Zuckerberg’s interests in the vaccine narrative.)
Similarly, right after anonymized vaccine data was made public by a whistleblower from New Zealand and shared for the purpose of expert analysis and research, those who had reposted the data found their servers hacked and the data removed.
And finally, why are many of us referring to these injections as “Bioweapons”?
For some background on bioweapons, see what international human rights lawyer Dr. Francis Boyle has been saying. https://www.biznews.com/health/2022/10/20/bioweapons-pandemics. Back in 1989, he drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, which was signed into law by George Bush, Sr. in the same year. Boyle later explained how President Joe Biden’s 2022 signing of the Executive Order on Advancing Biotechnology and Biomanufacturing Innovation, the purpose of which is to “develop and work and promote and implement … dual-use research of concern, and research involving potentially pandemic and other high-consequence pathogens,” is a blatant violation of the 1989 Bioweapons Act.
The Spike Glycoprotein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus contains a furin cleavage site that is absent in viruses of the same lineage (published in April 2020) https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166354220300528. “Before the emergence of the 2019-nCoV, this important feature was not observed in the lineage b of betacoronaviruses. However, it is shared by other CoV (HCoV-OC43, MERS-CoV, MHV-A59) harbouring furin-like cleavage sites in their S-protein.” This statement is being interpreted to mean that this virus was engineered and did not evolve naturally. The authors also state: “This furin-like cleavage site, is supposed to be cleaved during virus egress (Mille and Whittaker, 2014) for S-protein “priming” and may provide a gain-of-function to the 2019-nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population compared to other lineage b betacoronaviruses.” For more commentary on the implications of this study, note this article from February 2020 published by Natural News - a US based non-profit consumer health advocacy association. https://www.naturalnews.com/2020-02-19-covid-19-coronavirus-found-to-contain-gain-of-function-for-efficient-spreading-human-population.html
In 2015, a team of authors including Ralph S. Baric described their work as follows: we synthetically re-derived an infectious full-length SHC014 recombinant virus and demonstrate robust viral replication both in vitro and in vivo. They had reported that this virus was now poised “for human emergence.” https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4797993/
This 2020 Chinese article (cached via the Wayback Machine) explains early suspicions that the SARS-CoV-2 virus (2019-nCoV) had to have originated in a laboratory. The Wuhan Seafood Market purported to be the source of the virus had no bats for sale and was located over 900 km away. Meanwhile, within 280 meters of the market, a laboratory was known to be identifying bat-related pathogens. As well, the Wuhan Institute of Virology, the location of the authors of the study just referenced, is located 12 km from the Market. The article refers to tissue samples taken from caged animals (and contaminated trash) and that were deemed to be sources of the pathogens. https://web.archive.org/web/20200214144447/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/339070128_The_possible_origins_of_2019-nCoV_coronavirus
This study explains how SARS-CoV infections are “largely determined by the specific … interactions between a defined receptor-binding domain (RBD) on the SARS-CoV spike protein and its host receptor, angiontensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2)”. There appears to be a “missing link” between horseshoe bats and humans as the receptor-binding domain is not able to use the human ACE-2 receptor. This study points to a vast gene variability within bat species and finds 2 species with closer affinity. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00705-010-0729-6?fbclid=IwAR3yNfuHykjJbuDGMNqfo6eEFAZ5IqJ_KE9dgcrspGn4xdRQDFBYR8y4MP4
On a bit of a side note, this study outlining the clinical characteristics of the early SARS-CoV-2 cases in China points to a high degree of infection in contacts with people from Wuhan (and very low contact with wildlife, i.e. bats, etc.). It also reports a relatively LOW fatality rate. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.02.06.20020974v1.full-text
And finally, in this address, Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt provide evidence of the connection between the Covid vaccine development and roll out and members of the US military. They point to the sources of their documentation here: Sasha Latypova and Katherine Watt.
While this list is long, it hopefully provides newcomers to evidence-based Covid-19 related science with a starting point, one step at a time, up the information ladder, so that they too might see the evidence behind the claims that this injection is definitely NOT “Safe and Effective” and that we need to be wary about anyone pushing something like this again.
It’s up the ladder we go, building knowledge step by step!
This amazing image of knowledge being built came from here. To me it shows the many expert scientists who jointly and continually puzzle over new incoming data, making observations, finding ways to prove or disprove hypotheses and continually adding to the knowledge base!
