The Grand Quest - Part 1
I wanted to know what was driving certain individuals to risk losing their careers and teaching positions in order to try to convince public health officials to STOP following WHO and PHAC guidelines?
About 18 months ago, I set out to understand the disconnect between the public health directives and what major scientists in the field (many with super long lists of professional credentials, accolades, peer reviewed publications, citations, etc.) were saying. I wanted to know what was driving certain individuals to risk losing their careers and teaching positions in order to try to convince public health officials to STOP following WHO and PHAC guidelines - What were they worried about and how could there be such divergent conclusions if everyone is "following the science"? Isn't science impartial? Wouldn't the conclusions be obvious? I collected professional letters and wrote my own observations from about March to October of 2021 - and ended up with a compilation of over 70 PDF documents. That was impossible to share by email so I found a cheap simple website maker and put up my findings here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page2.html#content2-2u.
My writing included a few "think aloud protocols" as I explored my way through the affidavit sworn by Alberta CMOH Dr. Deena Hinshaw who faced legal action last summer (unreported on in most mainstream media), and as I sifted through the databases and other sources of scientific information at the top of the list for the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) employees. I created an information flow chart to help me find the missing parts - to see at which point certain sectors of the general population (like the Freedom Convoy participants) hear from and are informed by top level actively working scientists in the field while other sectors of the population (such as the public health decision makers, legal experts, educational authorities, captured mainstream media etc.) end up cut off from the flow of information, objective data, expert analysis, etc. as it is being worked out in the field. (See my illustration here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Following_the_Information_Trail.pdf)
One issue I identified is the crucial role of science advisors who filter the information they provide to governmental and other top decision makers. Often science advisors hold academic positions in universities that receive funding from various Pharmafunded think tanks, etc. Another issue is the time-dependent nature of government budgets. While they may occasionally contract out the gathering of data and advice to specialist advisory groups, once a document has been published, there is no one in-house to keep a daily eye on developments in the data, on newer studies published, on newer results posted elsewhere in the world. Soon advisors are citing advisors who are referring to published research that is over 6 months out of date. The current references to the supposed efficacy of the third shot (which is now being considered for the next round of mandates by federal health minister Duclos) is a case in point.
Sheldon Yakiwchuk, who has been following government COVID data for the past 2 years, confirmed what I had been finding. His June 7 Substack posting links back to the three Canadian sources that the office of Minister Duclos was referencing. These all hail back to last year (before the Omicron wave and before the second doses were even a thing). They have zero relevance to the question of the cumulative effect of the third dose for variants of Omicron.
This is the message we now need to share with any business, employer, sports organization, etc. etc. whose members or employees may be coerced towards accepting a third dose:
ANY AUTHORITY THAT IS GOING TO CLAIM EFFICACY MUST SHOW PROVEN RECENT EVIDENCE OF SAID EFFICACY but such evidence is NO LONGER POSSIBLE the longer the roll outs go on, GIVEN the TOXIC NATURE of VARIOUS parts of the COVID-19 vaccine products. Every employer, municipality, etc. etc. considering "doing the right thing" and falling in line with public health guidance MUST DEMAND recent evidence from public health officials AND THEN consult with the veritable independent experts as to the merits of that evidence. That evidence CANNOT hail back to January 2021 when the high level of antibodies to the spike protein component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was deemed as the single data point to measure efficacy. Data showing the supposed "efficacy" that refers to the first half of 2021 (which as we see still recycles through various government recommendations) does NOT address any current relevant questions such as
the quickly waning antibody levels (less than 8 weeks for the 4th shot);
immune escape (i.e. non sterilizing antibodies) driving the variants;
the fact that boosters sitting on drugstore shelves are still cued to the Wuhan variant, thus doing nothing for the various strains of the Omicron variant. (And any newer production, in an effort to address Omicron will still keep the Wuhan component and simply double the amount of mRNA, thus doubling the amount of spike protein and potentially causing double the damage we have seen so far.)
Nor do those data have any reference to the multiple safety signals of the vaccine products.
Yet on a nearly daily basis, new peer reviewed publications are shared on uncensored platforms such as
the Telegram site of the World Doctors’ Alliance, which was founded as a "collaboration between medical professionals across the world to address some of the most urgent and important issues surrounding the pandemic." See https://t.me/worlddoctorsalliance;
through various live streamed events bringing together medical professionals from around the world, including various Canadian voices, see https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/newsroom/;
via countless posts by medical, scientific and legal experts on the uncensored platform Substack, for example on the page of Steve Kirsch (philanthropist/tech entrepreneur, and early treatment + vaccine safety advocate) See his top stories here: https://stevekirsch.substack.com/archive?sort=top) He is closely connected to scientists and researchers at all levels including at the FDA etc., and continually posts lists of unanswered questions re: COVID measures. He has repeatedly invited those who promote the vaccine products to come forward with comprehensive answers to these questions. See this list of 20 questions to see what information those who wish to push the vaccine products are conveniently NOT addressing:
Attempts by Canadian academics, specialist physicians, even former provincial and federal health advisors or CMOH's to engage with Health Canada's COVID-19 response teams have all been ignored, as are calls for the PHAC to share the data upon which it bases its recommendations.
Particularly troubling is how DESPITE INFORMATION TO THE CONTRARY, already early in the declared pandemic PHAC incorrectly informed Assembly of First Nation members that there is “no specific treatment” for COVID-19 (https://www.afn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/CoronaVirus_Factsheet_ENG.pdf). For whatever reasons, government publications were drawn up, pulling from a very slim review of data. BC Health for example, prepared documentation at the time that expressly forbade the use of one early antiviral treatment in particular (ivermectin). A search of the origin of that recommendation demonstrates how slim the initial search for data was, as researchers drew from only 5 databases and preprint servers. Other studies were eliminated due to risks of “bias” and for not being random controlled trials. Generally in a hospital setting, doctors treat their patients and do not take the time and personnel to set up official random controlled trials, in which some patients would be given placebos instead of actual treatments. The idea of keeping people in hospital on placebos is preposterous anyway. BC Health could have organized random controlled trials if this was their criterion, instead of directing the researchers to exclude reports of treatment successful in hospital settings simply for NOT being a random control trial. https://medicalstaff.islandhealth.ca/sites/default/files/covid-19/latest-communications/bccdc/sbar-october.pdf See also: http://www.bccdc.ca/Health-Professionals-Site/Documents/Antimicrobial-Immunomodulatory-Therapy-adults.pdf Very troubling is that TODAY, July 7, 2022, BC’s COVID-19 treatment documentation STILL bans the use of ivermectin despite the March 2022 publication pointing at the successful use of IVM in the early treatment of COVID-19 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35135310/ as well as all the information gathered at
https://c19early.com/, https://earlycovidcare.org/ and https://covid19criticalcare.com/ivermectin-in-covid-19/. See also Document 10 here, https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Part_B_intro_and_5_9.pdf to understand how even well intentioned public health officials can be decoyed away from life-saving information if they only examine the first few entries in government “approved” data sources, where useful information only appears lower down on the list.
In a well intentioned (but ill-informed) move to support our indigenous population, the vax rollout prioritized individuals from First Nations, Metis and Inuit communities - which meant that these people, along with the elderly and immunocompromised, were among the first to be given the unproven and untested vaccine products, ahead of other Canadians.
BC family doctor Charles Hoffe witnessed how many of his primarily indigenous patients were impacted at the start of the rollout. His clarion warning call already in April 2021 should have been welcomed and acted upon, and should have resulted in the immediate suspension of the vax rollouts. He had written: “In Lytton, BC, we have an incidence of 1 in 225 of severe life-altering side-effects, from this experimental gene modification therapy.” He inquired whether these were “considered normal and acceptable long-term side-effects for gene modification therapy” and continued by saying that “Judging by medical reports from around the world, our Lytton experience is not unusual.” Instead of being recognized and rewarded as a much needed early warning signal, Dr. Hoffe was demonized and penalized. (You can hear more of his story from him directly here: https://notcbc.ca/2022/06/19/dr-charles-hoffe-of-lytton-bc-treated-12-patients-disabled-by-vaccines-and-was-silenced-by-dr-bonnie-henry/.)
And even now that there is a wealth of data pointing to the LACK of safety, efficacy and necessity of these products, First Nation, Metis and Inuit communities are once again being moved near the top of the list of those prioritized for the third dose. Given all information about how repeat injections of spike protein producing mRNA vaccines cause a REDUCTION in immunity, pushing the injections here would create a whole new group of immunocompromised individuals. It is now known that repeat injections of COVID-19 vaccine products result in HIGHER rates of illness, hospitalization and death. (See https://twitter.com/dksdata.) There is NO WAY our governments should be pushing Indigenous people (along with the elderly and the immunocompromised) to get more injections. We have had enough sadness and death re: misinformed policies for our indigenous population, enough stolen lives and weak apologies. Indigenous (and all) communities instead need to be provided with information and therapeutics that maximize the immune system, since there is both anecdotal AND peer-reviewed evidence of the benefits of various anti-virals, vitamins, minerals, plant based homeopathic medicines for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 (where antiviral medicines are still delayed).
See https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ and https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/homeopathic-medicine-monica-frohmann/.
A long dreary year after Dr. Hoffe’s warning call, in cooperation with Dr. Steven Pelech, Professor of Medicine (UBC) and Chair of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, I summarized the key concerns re: the vaccine products as they were known at the start of 2022. See: What EVERY Government and Policy Maker NEEDS TO KNOW about COVID-19 vaccines – the Problems with More Vaccinations: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1644775276499.pdf.
Since then, the Canadian Covid Care Alliance summarized more dangers in their Talking Point flyers https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/. Yet, every few days new publications point to additional adverse effects of these products, such as this article related to sperm motility written by Canadian vaccinologist Dr. Byram Bridle. (https://notcbc.ca/2022/06/26/the-pfizer-biontech-covid-19-shots-harm-sperm/)
Since posting my compilation on the https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/ website in October, I have added new sections. This included the LATEST page, where I chose what I considered to be the weekly TOP THREE STORIES. Here I linked to interviews, conference presentations and podcasts of many of the global "giants" in various aspects of COVID-19 treatment as well as vaccine related issues. And since I found myself spending a great deal of time explaining the issues in letters for various purposes, I started posting my letters as templates for others to make use of - to provide them with direct access to the information, hoping to save them some valuable time. (Anyone is invited to browse through the wide range of topics in the Letter section on the bottom half of the home page:
https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/)
I have been working with a small group of dedicated and (mostly retired) net-crawlers who point me to the various Top Stories of the week. In our searches, we found out about people who used to work for the WHO, who even worked in the US Department of Health and Human Services, and for Health Canada and who had tried to alert the top echelon of certain very serious ramifications of their proposed actions (suppression of antiviral early treatment protocols, implementation of lockdowns & masking, providing Emergency Use Authorization for improperly developed and tested COVID-19 vaccine products, and eventually mandating the use of said products.) This came along with what Dr. Fauci had known many years previously to be fatal doses of Remdesivir and with the deadly use of artificial ventilation. In particular nursing homes, it is now coming out that in some countries Midazolam (an end of life drug) was being given along with "Do Not Resuscitate" orders at an alarming rate - in order to make room for more incoming patients that often did not materialize. Chillingly the resulting symptoms/deaths from Remdesivir, ventilation issues and Midazolam could all be classified under the wide umbrella of “COVID symptoms,” thus driving fear among medical staff and the public alike. Likewise, the narrative of the “pandemic of the unvaccinated” could be caused by a slight of hand, considering every vaccinated individual as “unvaccinated” for the first 14 days post injection. This is the time frame during which most of the immediate vaccine injuries (including vaccine induced COVID-like symptoms) would emerge, while these people are still counted as UNvaccinated as they waited for the “effectiveness” to totally kick in. It is fraudulent directives like these, moved unquestioningly to the provincial level from the federal level and likely originating from the CDC or the WHO, that explain why legal actions on these matters can be prosecuted on a grand scale for “Crimes against Humanity.”
At every step of the way, top decision makers were approached by those who truly follow where the science leads (clearly away from all of these measures) but everywhere, those decision makers cherry picked the research they wanted to cite, and often launched their own research projects in which they could limit the parameters and skew the results in order to head directly toward these measures, the consequences be damned!!
In 2020, internal medicine and bioweapons expert Dr. Meryl Nass started listing the ways in which the news of the lifesaving successes of hydroxychloroquine was being suppressed. Since then her list stretches to 55 examples. https://anthraxvaccine.blogspot.com/search?q=hydroxychloroquine. News on the efficacy of Ivermectin was suppressed in a similar manner. In the meantime, those who publicly opposed the official BigPharma sponsored narrative (that there is no other safe alternative to the COVID-19 vaccine products and that these are most certainly “safe and effective”) were offered bribes or ordered to cover up their information. One example https://timenewsdesk.com/2022/03/pfizer-offered-1-million-bribe-to-stay-quiet-on-its-jabs-said-dr-paul-alexander/ and another:
Part 2 of this Quest continues in the next post.