Show us the Proof!! An utterly reasonable request.
Show us the Proof!! An utterly reasonable request.
A copy of a letter sent to two Canadian members of parliament re: a recently defeated request for evidence to support government COVID-19 "vaccine" mandate-related decisions.
Note, the links to the Citizen’s Hearing Clips are still relevant, but here is a more recent way of accessing the information: https://citizenshearing.ca and re: Health Canada’s mandatory test for Pfizer’s “vaccine safety” please follow the direct link to Shawn Buckley’s testimony here: https://citizenshearing.ca/day-2-videos-21-24/#shawn
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Date: Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 2:54 PM
Subject: OPEN LETTER RE: being asked for vax efficacy and safety details before making decisions
To: <Churence.Rogers@parl.gc.ca>, <Taylor.Bachrach@parl.gc.ca>
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words...
Please start with this:
Hello Hon MP Bachrach
I was thrilled to note your line of question in both the Health and Transportation committee meetings re: the need to provide MPs with full disclosure re: what information different ministries have received in advance of setting various policies (like the requirement for vaccination prior to being able to travel). Thrilled because I had sadly come to assume that all NDP MPs were following the lead of their leader to support Liberal policies come what may. Thrilled because up till now, my attempts to share information with NDP and Liberal MPs re the actual COVID-19 data have gone nowhere and it sounds like from your comments, that the many letters sent in to the Health committee members have been making a difference...
Hello Hon MP Rogers, my comments to you relate to your address to the Transportation committee https://openparliament.ca/committees/transport/44-1/25/the-chair-60/ While it is important to keep "legally commercially sensitive information" confidential (i.e. when it comes to business dealings) that argument cannot be used in matters of health and safety. As I understand it, the motion by MP Bachrach referred to “a copy of all relevant documents containing public health advice and scientific modeling received by the Minister of Transport” used to justify quarantines, masking, mandatory vaccination and other measures. I am gravely disappointed that you and your Liberal colleagues voted down what would be a totally reasonable request... one that essentially asks: Tell us WHY you deem it necessary to implement XYZ policy. This would be de rigeur from any other ministry in any other committee, caucus or government conversation. There was NO REFERENCE to "commercially sensitive" information in the request.... unless all the "advice" and "modelling" came uniquely from a commercial entity such as a vaccine company! Please adopt the stance taken by your esteemed prior leader, the Hon Jean Chretien when it comes to the question: Show me the proof!! May there be no action until something is proven (with a good proof)!!
Your colleagues in the House are making this request on behalf of an entire nation of Canadians who are realizing that the "proof" of vaccine necessity, efficacy and safety has been severely lacking. In fact, it has become clear from the testimony of Alberta regulatory lawyer Shawn Buckely to the three-person panel at the recently held Citizens' Hearing that:
Health Canada, in what reads like propaganda in a police state, declares the “vaccines” have been proven to be totally safe and effective. Pfizer has to meet a mandatory test produced by Health Canada, and if it meets that test, Health Canada must approve Pfizer’s product, and has no discretion. Buckley reads out the test: “The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks”. In other words, Pfizer does not have to prove that the “vaccine” is safe, or that it works, or even that the benefits outweigh the risks. All Pfizer has to do is cherry-pick data to support the conclusion—and that constitutes “sufficient evidence”. The second part of the test even allows for uncertainties about safety and efficacy: “…having regard to the uncertainties relating to the benefits and risks and the urgent public health need”. In other words, Buckley argues, Pfizer has not had to prove either safety or efficacy. https://zeroanthropology.net/2022/06/28/day-2-of-a-citizens-hearing-examining-canadas-covid-response/
Was this the "commercially sensitive" information you were hoping to keep out of the public eye by voting down MP Bachrach's motion?
I am sure, in making his motion, MP Bachrach was expecting the reams and reams of scientific data that Dr. Tam and others at PHAC imply they are consulting when they make their recommendations. There would have been no need for the Liberals to vote down the totally rational request to show the evidence, had there actually been evidence. If you take the time to listen to the three days of testimonies or to read over the excellent summations of each of the presenters' information (under "Citizens' Hearing" here: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/) you will become aware of the latest information in the world of COVID-19/immunity/Long Covid/Vaccine injury, etc. etc. This will be much more up to date than the research that your colleague, the Hon. The Minister of Health and the people at PHAC have been accessing. See the finding by this data analyst that the most recently announced third dose mandate is based on single dose, pre-omicron studies, and thereby totally IRRELEVANT to today's state of affairs.
As of this week, the numbers of severe life altering events is staggering, likewise the numbers of deaths. (See the BC Vaccine Injury Telegram site: https://t.me/covidbc.) As you work your way through the information being shared here, please ensure that your colleague, the Hon Minister Duclos, and any others who share his mindset, get access to this information too. If no one gets him to "see the light" and to pull back from his proposed push for more vaxxing, he and PM Trudeau will find themselves disrespected nationwide.
Additionally, please take note of the court order coming from Uruguay where a judge is demanding that both the Ministry of Health AND the vaccine companies provide not only scientific, health related proof BUT ALSO company contracts. (Please refer to https://en.mercopress.com/2022/07/07/a-judge-in-uruguay-has-prohibited-covid-vaccines-for-children-health-ministry-complies-with-the-ruling, also July 8). If it is possible there, why not here?
You will note that the Uruguayan health ministry has complied with the court order and has halted the vaccination of the under 13s nation-wide till the proof of necessity, safety and efficacy has come to light. As more and more fraudulent activity at Pfizer becomes well-known thanks to the court ordered release of their data as well (see the links on the pink band here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page13.html) the information will point in ONLY ONE DIRECTION: Defy BigPharma; defy the compromised "experts" and "regulators"; STOP and BAN the VAX; teach citizens how to further build their immunity, how to test for D-Dimers as an early warning system for the detection of potentially fatal blood clots, how to treat vaccine damaged patients and so much more. See the website of the new alternate (uncompromised) body for health decision making that has now been put together in response to the corruption at the WHO. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/about/ .
To "flatten the curve" and "reduce the strain on the healthcare system" the TOTALLY WRONG THING to do is to push MORE dangerous injections. When 50% of the population is already triple dosed with an immune suppressing substance it is no surprise that a significant percentage of Canada's pilots, health care workers, first responders, parents, children, athletes, are now severely at risk, missing work and lining up for vax-injury compensation... the only question for the remainder is where in their bodies spike protein is amassing, and how long it will be before any subsequent damage may come to light. As parties interested in transportation, you must certainly have been following the hearing on airline safety put on at the European Parliament? https://www.europarl.europa.eu/streaming/?event=20220705-1930-SPECIAL-OTHER&rampActive=true
Consider following international organizations like the World Doctors' Alliance on Telegram, the new uncensored media platform (https://t.me/worlddoctorsalliance) and/or key Canadian and international immunology and other experts as recommended here:
A number of previous posts on this site can also be relevant to your current situation - that of deciding which course of action to take first, now that you might be hearing some of this for the first time. They lead to food for thought, or to even more highly reputable sources of uncensored information.
-
Additionally, you can find copies of a number of letters written to Canadian parliamentarians over the past year on this site:
https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/ (scroll down to Letters) and one to Dr. Teresa Tam specifically here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page25.html. Here we express the concern that outside forces (i.e. the terms of the Pfizer deals) are preventing her from following up on her initial commitment: that of following the science and being willing to make changes to policies as the need arose.
YOU need to find ways to extricate her personally and Canadians in general from the iron grip that the likes of Pfizer and Moderna now have on our country. More on that topic is also found here:
And if you have access to page 88 of this amazing book, Economix, take a look at how Teddy Roosevelt had the political will to use his "big stick" and the "square deal" to break down the industrialists power. We need that kind of political will now too!!
https://archive.org/details/economixhowourec0000good/page/8/mode/2up
Thank you
Sincerely,
Hannah Luise
(on behalf of many other Concerned Citizens nationwide)