Letter to Health Care Policy Makers (and their Ardent Supporters) whose colleagues are now ILL or DYING

Also useful for Rule-Following Health Care Workers, Politicians and all others whose Compassion was Weaponized, such that even today hearing from "the Other Side" is painful

In the previous post, I listed the wide range of COVID-19 News NOT IN THE NEWS. I closed with two choices for public health officials, policy makers and those impacted by said policies: Continue with the denialism or come clean with the truth and apologize for having misplaced your trust.

Here, I address health policy makers on a more personal level. For a myriad of reasons, they supported the whole collection of pandemic mitigation measures (most likely out of genuine compassion, belief in their safety, and ingrained refusal to look critically at incoming reports to the contrary). And now, they find themselves at the bedsides or gravesites of former colleagues in the health policy making business (or are experiencing baffling, maybe even debilitating illnesses themselves).

Are they able to jump beyond factors described by a critical Alberta substacker as follows:

=========================================================================

========================================================================

So this letter is now going out to those who

• had no idea that Operation COVID now meets the criteria of being a military-led psychological operation for reasons few dare look into

• are likely still required by their jobs (if they are still able to work) to continue the “safe and effective” messaging

• might NOT be able to see the government as anything other than a friendly parent

• might be lashing out at anyone who indicates how full of “counterfactuals” the government/corporate backed messaging still is

• might be terrified to admit they were wrong

• and might be truly hostile to the contents of the message in this post

Dear XXXXX,

I certainly understand that it was very difficult being a front line health professional during the declared COVID-19 Pandemic. It is fully tragic that you and your colleagues were played like pawns...

Effective COVID-19 treatment and preventative protocols WERE developed based on SARS 1 and on the insights of tropical medicine specialists, who found that anti-malarial and Nobel prize winning anti-viral drugs latched on very effectively to certain parts of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, coating it so it could be eliminated and excreted without much harm. As a result, early COVID-19 treatment protocols were successfully published and used in China, the USA, Mexico, France, South Africa and other places even before COVID-19 took much of a foothold in Canada.

What should have ALARMED ALL CANADIANS was the combined pressure on all of the leading proponents of these protocols once mRNA products were getting ready for market. In order for the approval of the novel COVID vaccines to bypass all the normal steps, they would need to come in under "emergency use authorization" (US term) and "interim order" (in Canada). The big stipulation for EUA or IO was that THERE SHOULD BE NO OTHER treatment available at that time. So Google, Facebook and Twitter fact-checker algorithms were all programmed to catch references to these alternate treatments and "quarantine" those who typed about them. Those who followed international research that pointed at success with long recognized treatments were stripped of their medical licenses, their academic appointments, their lab access… Conscientious professionals in a wide range of medical, scientific and legal fields were shadow-banned so that their posts were given reduced visibility. Many of their social media accounts were deleted outright. They were fired from their academic positions. If you follow the money, you note how Google and Meta etc. were heavy vaccine investors and had a vested interest to shut down a potential threat to their profit margin. It was a concerted, nearly global campaign.

What ALSO should have ALARMED US ALL was the huge number of well-intentioned, ill informed voices commenting on social media and everywhere else recycling talking points IN COMPLETE ABSENCE OF KNOWN INFORMATION.

When health care policy makers are completely UNAWARE of or OBLIVIOUS to NEWS COMING OUT OF THEIR FIELD, there is something deeply wrong with the information ecosystem. Critical observers have to ask:

• Is there something that KEEPS top policy makers from actually GETTING THE INFORMATION? And if so, what barriers need to be dismantled?
  OR

• Are top policy makers incentivized in some way to purposely implement flawed policies? And if so, WHAT are those incentives? HOW can they be replaced with incentives to do what is TRULY best for humanity? HOW did they get it into their heads that what they are implementing is SAFE? EFFECTIVE? NECESSARY AND CONTINUES TO BE SO? HOW did they forget about the basic tenet of the scientific process that continually calls for a critical approach to all findings, to continually question conclusions and re-Search any shortcomings, being TRULY OPEN TO SCIENTIFIC INQUIRY?

See https://totalityofevidence.com/pandemic-timeline/pandemic-2021.

THIS WAS the news being suppressed by social media algorithms in January, February 2021, a year following the rollout of COVID-19 vaccine products in Canada.

Also suppressed:

From March 2021 young, healthy, fit athletes across the world BEGANcollapsing or dying at RATES never recorded before in history. By February 5, 2022 that toll had reached 624 sudden deaths. [1] By mid 2021, various sports organisations made it a requirement for athletes to submit to the “emergency use” COVID-19 vaccines in order for them to participate in sports or receive pay, including school children. [2, 3, 4, 5]

By the end of 2021 the “fact checkers” assured the public that of their review of “publicly available information” of 19 athletes there is “no proof” of a causal relationship with the vaccine or whether they were vaccinated.

Good Sciencing is tracking the global collapse and death toll of athletes from public records – HERE
They reported studies done prior to 2020 showed average of 66 athlete deaths per year. Compare this to deaths vaccine mandate years:

• 2021 = 416

• 2022 = 791

• 2023 = 245

• The month of January 2022 = 97

  (SOURCE: https://totalityofevidence.com/pandemic-timeline/pandemic-2021)

This partially completed ARCHIVE of COVID-19 related news and developments should be a FUNDAMENTAL resource for anyone continuing to develop recommendations for any “vaccine” products, particularly those built on an mRNA platform.

https://totalityofevidence.com

Despite facts known already in January /February 2021, for example, that…

• there is a documented patent application history not only for the mRNA vaccine components but also for components of the engineered SARS-CoV-1 VIRUS going back to well BEFORE the official announcement of the “discovery” of a “novel pathogen” in Wuhan, China and way BEFORE the “exciting news” of scientists busily working around the world to produce the cure-all COVID-19 vaccines in record time.

• the WOLRD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO) was already aware that the products don’t stop infection, or transmission (i.e. they are NOT VACCINES)

• the WHO was at the same time developing public awareness/behavioural programming schemes to normalize acceptance of these products WHILE setting up a compensation mechanism for those adversely impacted

• adverse events following injection of mRNA ‘vaccines’ went through the roof

• the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) were covering up vaccine failure with terminology like “vaccine breakthrough” and making statements like these:

MANY MONTHS LATER one Alberta medical professional turned politician was telling her followers:

Declining to be vaccinated is like drinking and driving. You and your own family are most likely to be hurt but you put innocent bystanders at risk. Dr. Luanne Metz @luanne_metz Sep 9, 2021

And Dr. Sunil Sookram, now temporarily appointed Alberta’s interim chief medical officer of health, reportedly made this comment in October 2021:

HOW can they have been so ignorant of NEWS IN THEIR OWN FIELD?

WHO BENEFITS from having influential health figures push people into one profitable direction?

WHO IS AT FAULT FOR THE BLOCKAGES IN THE INFORMATION TRAIL?

When ordinary citizens, citizen journalists and all manner of critically minded health professionals have been accessing evolving, evidence-based news since the start, HOW IS IT THAT so many health policy makers are STILL LIVING IN DENIAL?

Didn’t they ever encounter any worrying headlines coming via US media during all that time? (See this short collage of mostly US news report clips.)

But it went even further than simply blocked or ignored information. Critical observers are noting that every description of 5th generation warfare fits the situation. Once the "safe and effective" narrative was unleashed by marketers and government social behavioural shaping programs (yes those exist), compassion was weaponized. You in the front lines were not initially told that some of the protocols Dr. Fauci rolled out like Remdesivier HE HIMSELF WAS ON RECORD for saying were deadly. People we used to admire for their adamant speaking out, like feminist author Naomi Wolf, once they carried on doing just that, were immediatlely vilified as being hateful and "hurting our elders" etc. Welcome to the Information War.

https://blog.guardianai.io/understanding-fifth-generation-warfare-and-its-implications/

Unfortunately for you, to continue believing today (IN 2025) that the science being presented at the Injection for Truth events, at the National Citizens Inquiry, at the almost monthly international conferences of leading edge independently working scientists is MIS INFORMATION speaks to the tragic failure of our "fourth estate" the mainstream MEDIA - As they are government and corporate backed (to the tune of 2 billion or more dollars in Canada), they are obliged to stay "on message" - When the placing of orders of vaccines became a political issue, those who questioned its safety were let go from their jobs. One of our vocal critics at the time was even offered an extraordinary amount of money by Pfizer in return for his silence, which he turned down. It makes you wonder who else got those offers and took them...

Have you ever wondered why major investigative journalists like Trish Wood, Rodney Palmer, Anita Krishna, Donna Laframboise and Marianne Klowak no longer work at corporate-backed and government-funded “mainstream media”? Or longstanding CBC comedian Cathy Jones? Check out the National Citizen Injury testimonies to hear the ugly side of corporate censorship in Canada. (Palmer in March 2023, Palmer in May 2023, Krishna, Klowak, Jones)

Or tune into this insightful discussion between Trish Wood and Rodney Palmer.

It seems these days like the media who used to be on our side, the citizen’s side, has turned against us. Former journalist Rodney Palmer gave a scary presentation to the National Citizen’s Inquiry (NCI) that exposed how badly the CBC let us down during the C-19 public policy crisis. He joins Trish to discuss what’s happened to their former profession and the Mothercorp where both of them spent some very productive years.

We are now all turning to the Fifth Estate, the rich media eco-system that is alive and well outside of the mainstream press. I invite you to book a few hours of your time and actually sit down and listen to the depth of evidence presented at various conferences or gatherings of independent evidence-based scientific and medical professionals. Have someone from your provincial/territorial/federal health data department sit down with you and ask them to open their laptop to point to the actual data on their various public health websites that COUNTERS the realities of what has been shared by the myriad of independent scientific and medical professionals who are continually pushing the boundaries of what public health officials have been limiting themselves to.

Ask your trusted public health experts not to simply shrug off inconvenient claims as “conspiracy theories” or “mis/dis/mal/information” but rather to LOOK CLOSELY at the findings. Ask questions like: HOW RECENT are the studies being cited by the pro-vaxxers? Where do the pro-vaxxers see the shortcomings of their own research and how are they setting up double-blind, placebo controlled studies to replicate the findings originally reported on with abandon?. How do they explain, for example that the original claims about the “95% efficacy rate”, etc. didn’t stand up to the original reporting?

Ask why, for example, did this Health Canada document: Summary of updates in the Canadian Immunization Guide as of June 27, 2023: Updated guidance on COVID-19 vaccines in Canada reference a study going back to 2021 with this optimistic conclusion:

All study vaccines boosted antibody and neutralising responses after ChAd/ChAd initial course and all except one after BNT/BNT, with no safety concerns.

Ask either of the study itself, or of the totality of the rest of the references (including this study on children under 12)

• How long was the follow up period (weeks? months? years?) Given the screening date as June 2021 and the PUBLICATION date December 2021 we cannot be looking anything more than a 4-5 month follow up period. Who is monitoring for cumulative and possibly more slowly developing adverse events, for example, of a neurological nature?

• How are you measuring “effectiveness”? Usually in studies cited by the pro-vaxxers, “effectiveness” is simply an increase in a certain type of antibodies, which then is assumed to be sufficient to “protect” against COVID-19. Little consideration is given to the short term nature of that increase. And there seem to be NO comparisons between vaccine-induced antibody protection (coded to one variant of the virus only) versus full spectrum protection resulting from having recovered from the illness versus the efficacy of antiviral treatments taken as a prophylaxis (preventatively).

• How applicable is a study without anyone under 30 years of age or older than 78 supposed to be for infants, toddlers, or the frail elderly?

• Did they rule out any pregnancies as part of any studies cited? and if so, how could the study be seen as applicable to fetal & maternal health?

• Which types of adverse events were recognized? I.e. if the study designers relied on self-reported adverse events, were participants alerted as to the wide range of potential adverse events already noted in conduction with these products?

• Ask how long it will be before new research reviews will be commissioned with a focus on more RECENT data?

• Ask how they justify continuing to recommend the products DESPITE KNOWN ADMISSIONS by Health Canada that should point to the contrary? (See 1. How few/many of these ADMISSIONS FROM CANADIAN HEALTH AGENCIES are being reported in Canadian Mainstream Media? here.)

Ask HOW Health Canada, on its website COVID-19 vaccines: Canadian Immunization Guide (last updated 2025-02-05) is justifying its latest recommendations

How does do people turning 65, or living in a care home, or in a First Nation, Metis and Inuit community, belonging to a radicalized, equity-denied community, being a health care worker, or a child with complex health needs, pregnant, or being a baby older than 6 months, or having an underlying immunocompromising condition or treatment BENEFIT from MORE INJECTIONS that have been known, and admitted to by top world health organizations already in 2021 as NOT preventing illness and transmissions WHILE ALSO having the potential for severe adverse events/sudden deaths/rapidly advancing cancers and the like?

These recommendations appear written to pull on the heart strings… OF COURSE, the very young, the elderly, the immunocompromised, those consistently denied equity NEED SPECIAL PROTECTION…. and of course, the COVID-19 vaccines are safe and effective, so OF COURSE, we will recommend these vaccines for them. And OF COURSE it would be cruel and hateful to deny them protection. Where is the compassionate health care worker or policy maker that would want to DENY special protection for this unprotected group of our most vulnerable?

What about the studies that show how boosting Vitamin D and A levels REALLY DOES help people of all ages and stages fight off infections without the huge potential for adverse side effects? How is it that in the Global South, where so many people regularly take anti-malaria medication, that COVID-19 was almost non existant of a factor? What did their medical researchers and public health professionals know that you in Canada appear to not have known? Where was the news of jurisdictions able to combat COVID-19 by means other than vaccines, such as this news from September 2021: The state of Uttar Pradesh in India, with a population of 241 million people, 33 districts, and under 6% vaccinated, has been declared COVID-free by it’s government (SOURCE)

Corporate “fact-checkers” aside, WHERE is the solid, actual PROOF that “dissident” doctors, researchers, scientists speaking here are PROVIDING DISINFORMATION? Or that one cannot give credence to injury victims or their family members? See:

• National Citizens Inquiry testimonies (33 full days of hearings held in 11 cities across the country over nearly 2 years with hundreds of testimonies) (Expert witness list 2023) (Commissioners’ Recommendations)

• two “Injection of Truth” public events held in Calgary Alberta (June 17, 2024 & March 3, 2025). See slide decks of presenters for both events here.

• the presenters at the International Crisis Summit 5 shown here with further explanation here. See also the ICS 4 held in Romania here in 2023 (with 3 prior international gatherings of this magnitude.)

• Check out the regular dialogues hosted by the grass-roots World Council for Health (NOT to be mixed up with the top-down pharma compromised World Health Organization.. WCH vs WHO) here as well as via Substack posts like this one:

  Bombshell revelation: Covid-19 injections proven to integrate into human genome

  Note the defamatory and unsupported write up about the WCH on Wikipedia vs the more rational write up of the organization itself, here.

• Go back in time to the earliest international investigative committee testimonies hosted back in 2021 by German American Lawyer Reiner Fuellmich here. IN 2014, he was pivotal in the legal team that prosecuted Volkswagen re: their fraudulent emissions scandal. Ask yourself who has benefitted from his unconstitutional detainment in a German prison for 18 months, mostly in solitary confinement and denied bail awaiting a court prosecution on trumped up, insincere charges of fraud? And who benefits from the additional 2 years & 8 months of jail time still ahead following the “guilty” conviction announced earlier today? Sidelining one of the most skillful legal attorneys who was building a vast catalogue of solid evidence identifying military-industrial complex collusion on a global scale might have provided a temporary reprieve for the perpetrators of the greatest crime against humanity (so far) in this century. But it has not stopped efforts of people elsewhere from seeking justice for crimes committed by many.

INVITE the experts YOU RELY ON to explain what they see as the FLAWS of the research being cited in each of the examples above. Have them demonstrate why the research THEY rely on is better designed, less fraught with bias, and advances scientific understanding. Have them also look into the sources of their research. Do they note a red flag upon reading, for example, that this study on children under 12) originated from scientists at these locations: “University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Gillings School of Global Public Health (DYL, YX, YG, DZ), North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (BW, HY, ZM), and CDC Foundation at North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (SKS).” ? Check their reactions. It could be that they are unaware of financial connections between a notably corrupt leading US health official and these institutions. Ask them if they have ever been concerned about the potential for conflicts if interest with similar research in Canada?

Two more tests for your trusted public health data experts…

How do they respond to the unreported news, and in particular to Health Canada’s admissions, linked to in our previous post?

AND

What advice do they have for their colleagues on medical leave, in hospital or palliative care, or for grieving families WHEN those colleagues were indeed recipients of Health Canada “approved” mRNA injections?

What diagnostic and treatment guidelines do they provide when (in the case of rapidly advancing cancer for example) “traditional” cancer treatments like chemo, radiation and surgery are not effective? What else is there left to be done?

Health Canada has offered Vaccination webinars and webcasts for health professionals with information on how to “relax and distract” patients who present with “needle fear”. But what about when things go wrong?

Why is there no information coming from Health Canada to medical professionals showing them WHAT TO DO about the ADVERSE REACTIONS of the products they have continued to purchase and recommend, FOUR YEARS after the CDC, the WHO, the FDA and more recently HEALTH CANADA itself ADMITTED the products were not only flawed, but dangerous? Don’t Canadian doctors deserve to get some guidance?

How much of the $ 3,358,888,144 now recently allocated to Health Canada as “urgently required for the public good” will ACTUALLY GO TO TEACHING PHYSICIANS what to do when faced with mRNA-injected patients (even colleagues) rapidly moving to the palliative wards of this country? Or possibly some of the $ 361,820,295 now being allocated to the Public Health Agency of Canada, not to mention $ 242,224,516 going to the Canadian Institutes of Health Research? (Source) How much of the research funding provided via the Canadian Institutes of Health Research will be allocated for verification of existing known evidence-based treatment for the litany of harms now deriving from these mRNA injections?

It is time to replace those public health officials who have inexplicably NOT BEEN FOLLOWING EVOLVING EVIDENCE with those who have.

There is no reason consummate professionals who have diligently and freely been providing public education on vaccine injury treatment protocols should NOT BE HIRED ON in the place of those who use up government money with denialism and “behavioural modification” programs.

Where are webinars informing physicians for example

• at which dosage ivermectin has been shown to inhibit the growth of certain cancer cells (in 2018) (in 2021)

• how, according to case studies collected by an Alberta oncologist and former nuclear medicine radiologist at the Cross Cancer Institute, Dr. William Makis, ivermectin in combination with mebendazole (or in some cases fenbendazole) can shrink cancer tumours in a matter of weeks or months, often without chemo or radiation. Dr. Makis reported on a dozen cases in the 4 week period from March 31 to April 24 2025: (Stage 4 Neuroendocrine Cancer of small bowel metastatic to liver and pancreas) (Stage 4 Breast Cancer metastatic to lungs, liver, and bones) (Stage 4 Colorectal Cancer metastatic to liver receiving chemotherapy) (extensive Follicular Lymphoma) (2.5 year old girl with recurrent metastatic Wilm’s Tumor/pediatric kidney cancer, metastatic to the lungs) (Stage 4 Invasive Lobular Breast Cancer metastatic to lymph nodes, bones, and possibly pituitary gland) (International Athlete diagnosed with a 11cm Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma, inoperable) (Stage 4 Breast Cancer patient with metastatic lymph nodes in the thorax and abdomen) (Stage 4 Ovarian Cancer metastatic to peritoneum) (Stage 4 NSCLC Lung Cancer with lymph node, liver, and adrenal metastases) (Stage 4 Rectal Cancer/small cell Neuroendocrine with metastases to the liver and bones) (Stage 4 Pancreatic Cancer) (Lymphoma metastasis) Note that Dr. William Makis has over 100 peer reviewed scientific publications showing on PubMed. In a recent publication, IgG4 Antibodies Induced by Repeated Vaccination May Generate Immune Tolerance to the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein, the following possibility is discussed: “Increased IgG4 synthesis due to repeated mRNA vaccination with high antigen concentrations may also cause autoimmune diseases, and promote cancer growth and autoimmune myocarditis in susceptible individuals.”