Flipping the Switch on Information and Mis/Disinformation
The need to do so becomes more OBVIOUS by the week!!!
It’s time to recognize that what was pushed on us as INFORMATION is turning out to be more FALSE as the weeks go by while what is maligned as MIS-DISINFORMATION is actually closer to the TRUTH!
AUDIO VERSION:
Misinformation is false information that may be unintentionally spread, while disinformation is a broader category that includes information, typically encountered online, that could lead to misperceptions.
More insidious than misinformation, disinformation includes false information that is deliberately spread. These definitions as recorded here are pretty standard these days.
Misinformation is false information that may be unintentionally spread, while disinformation is a broader category that includes information, typically encountered online, that could lead to misperceptions.
More insidious than misinformation, disinformation includes false information that is deliberately spread. (Source - near end of article)
So just as “Beauty is in the eye of the beholder” so it appears that the terms Mis/Disinformation are in the eye of those looking at X statement.
Any statements that push back against the carefully crafted Narrative that COVID-19 vaccines are safe, effective, necessary are seen by those with shares in the development or distribution of said vaccine products as MIS or even DIS-information.
Likewise any claims about the safety, necessity and efficacy about the so-called vaccines that lead to suffering and death of patients and society as a whole are considered by medical and scientific experts in the know as MIS and even DIS-information.
For some clarity, it helps to look at a PUBLIC HEALTH definition of “Information” —> Data in Context. Where DATA is not CONTEXTUALISED, where there are mismatches between the data and the context or where either one is incomplete or only partially complete, the “information” is invalid.
So as you read recent NEWS STORIES and opposing statements, figure out which INFORMATION is invalid in some way or leads to fatal misperceptions. The stories below reflect news not found in censored (aka mainstream/legacy/corporate/ compromised/dinosaur) media.
https://www.normanfenton.com/post/breaking-news-uk-government-says-vaccine-not-safe-for-pregnant-or-breastfeeding-women Here we have internet sleuths looking to see when the UK first expressed this guidance: it is considered that sufficient reassurance of safe use of the vaccine in pregnant women cannot be provided at the present time & Women who are breastfeeding should also not be vaccinated. Similar sleuths even found instances where previous OPPOSITE statements were still appearing on different pages of the same website —> This points to the crucial importance of scrubbing the MISinformation from every page on entire government websites - a time-consuming but crucial and urgent task… Every government health department needs to plan for a complete relaunch of its COVID-related webpages to reflect CURRENT evidence in the field.
https://rumble.com/v1givn7-cdc-finally-admits-to-botching-pandemic.html From August 19, 2022 - The American Association of Physicians and Surgeons is using the censorship-free platform RUMBLE to share this interview with two of the leading academic voices from the get-go - Dr. Peter McCullough (renal cardiologist, the most highly published in his field, one of the leaders in the development of safe & effective COVID-19 treatment protocols) and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya (Professor of Medicine at Stanford University) are interviewed on Fox News - nearly the only mainstream media platform that has started giving airtime to “the other side of the story.” Other platforms tied in to vaccine investors via various routes are being prevented from giving these highly regarded scientists airtime.
https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/07/05/time-to-assume-that-health-research-is-fraudulent-until-proved-otherwise/ So much for academic rigour - and innocent till proven guilty. This ties in with OLD NEWS - yet NEWS MOST OF US HAVE NEVER SEEN —- Did you know that ONLY FIVE of the 32 authors of study that claimed the efficacy of the Pfizer/Biontech vaccine product that was at the base of global COVID-19 vaccination drive did NOT have ties to Pfizer or other BigPharma firms? In January, 2022, the independent researchers at the Canadian Covid Care Alliance pointed out the various flaws with that study, flaws clearly designed to leave a certain perception of safety in the minds of the public…i.e. Deliberate Disinformation. See: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Final-CCCA-Critique-Thomas-COVID-19-Vaccines-6-months-NEJM-Jan-10-22.pdf
Have you heard news of this analysis of the COVID-19 Vaccine contents anywhere in mainstream media? “The Working Group for Covid Vaccine Analysis is an interdisciplinary working group that has undertaken the task of analyzing the contents and the effects of the novel Covid-19 “vaccines.” The group is an internationally networked working group with a core team of more than 60 doctors, physicians, pharmacists, scientists, mathematicians, alternative health practitioners, lawyers and journalists.” Crystalline formations were found in all of the blood samples taken from vaccinated people, clearly distinguishing them from the blood of unvaccinated people.
SAFE? When a list of these ingredients is NOT provided to those deciding to come get “immunized” there can be no talk of “informed consent.”
These experts now call for an IMMEDIATE stop to the vaccine rollout. https://expose-news.com/2022/08/13/german-researchers-stop-vaccines-immediately/ And yet government websites such as this one still claim it is MISINFORMATION to determine that vaccines are NOT SAFE AND EFFECTIVE.
The new “bivalent” boosters, allegedly protect us from BA.4 and BA.5 variants of Omicron as so cheerily promised in this article from Forbes Magazine: “…these new bivalent booster should offer the same level of protection as the original booster plus a booster of extra updated protection.”
Now, is that information or Mis or Dis information? Compare that text from Forbes with what we learn from those in the business of studying pharmacological trials (Trial Site News):
Both Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna are developing bivalent updates that include the original now extinct spike protein [Wuhan] while addressing a previous Omicron version. See "Public Health Leadership becomes more Reckless: Choices Prolong the Pandemic & Pad Pfizer’s Pockets.” for a read as to why this may not be an optimal approach, and in fact, may include some junk science.
On this topic, TrialSite recently provided a link to Pfizer's Phase 2 clinical trial that was just posted on July 25th. The company failed to include a candidate with BA.5 at all. They include two bivalent candidates. The first is Wuhan/BA.1 and the second is Wuhan/BA.2. It's possibly a mistake to include Wuhan since it may reinforce immune imprinting (aka: Original Antigenic Sin). It's an even bigger mistake to then also not use the currently dominant BA.5 which differs markedly from other Omicron subvariants.
Who is misinforming whom here?
Here, it is reported that Health Canada has done a “thorough & independent” scientific review. Where have we heard that before? When it comes to COVID-19 vaccination and Health Canada, we learned at the Citizens’ Hearing of the “test” that Health Canada undergoes when authorizing ONLY COVID vaccines - that has nothing to do with actual safety and efficacy.
So given that, is HEALTH CANADA distributing MISinformation in its claims of “thorough” investigations? The NOTES of the “thorough” investigations should be shipped along with the vax products to every pharmacy in the country IF THEY EXIST and IF THEY PROVE safety, along with a commentary by the evidence-based physicians & researchers who understand the processes these new bivalent products trigger in the body (i.e. TWO sets of instructions to make toxic SPIKE PROTEIN —> double the damage!!!)
As the folk at TrialSiteNews explain:
They [those promoting the bivalent injections, including staff at the CDC] don’t offer practical tools to help doctors, nor the public better understand actual risk-benefit/harm-benefit analyses associated with the mRNA vaccines and the actual virus and its consequences. They operate under the assumption that we are still in December of 2020 and that the effectiveness rates are above 90% and that there are not any safety issues. The purported experts we must depend on fail to acknowledge the actual discloses in the regulatory material owned by the FDA. (Source)
Wikipedia purports using a “neutral” point of view. Yet when it comes to evidence-based science around COVID-19 matters, its authors are definitely letting their biases shine through. A number of evidence-based scientists have given up on correcting incorrectly written posts about themselves. US Senator Ron Johnson is described on Wikipedia as follows:
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Johnson voted for the CARES Act, resisted stay at home orders, used his chairmanship of the Senate Homeland Security Committee to invite witnesses to push fringe theories about COVID-19, and spread misinformation about COVID-19 vaccinations.
To verify for yourself to what degree Senator Johnson ought to be considered as pushing “fringe theories” or “misinformation” about COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine injury, spend the 1 1/2 hours listening to the Senator here: https://thehighwire.com/videos/sen-ron-johnson-pandemic-politics-americas-covid-cartel/ Realize that a lot of Canadian vaccines victims are praying that an equivalent of Ron Johnson would emerge here in Canada!
In addition to governments, media and pharmaceutical corporations throwing around the “mis/disinformation” label at anyone criticizing Covid vaccine “safety”, there are also a ton of non-governmental organizations doing the same thing. Various NGOs put their effort into “cancelling” critical voices in the public sphere when instead they could be focusing on learning from the science and changing their stance. Here we hear from a Moderna Whistleblower as to the extent of malfeasance in the vaccine trials. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/moderna-clinical-trials-flawed-fda-pharma-executive-alexandra-latypova-rfk-jr-podcast/ Unfortunately Robert F. Kennedy Jr. - the founder of Children’s Health Defense - has been identified as one of the “Disinformation Dozen” in a creative smear campaign by the Centre for Countering Digital Hate. Anyone who is aware of that might be drawn AWAY from the kind of valuable information shared on the CHD website. While opposing racism and extremism are noble causes, to have social activists use their platforms to prevent people from being exposed to life and death information is unconscionable. This excerpt comes from document by the CCDH entitled “The Anti-vax Playbook”. As of June 2021, pretty much every page of so-called “misinformation” has already been verified as scientifically correct.
This article lists the membership of the so-called “Disinformation Dozen” and follows that with key figures who, in continuing to push the “safe and effective” narrative on the planet’s population and who with today’s scientific understanding of COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccination, are themselves now promulgating MIS /DISinformation. https://thetruthaboutvaccines.com/real-disinformation-dozen/
Reclaim the Net is an initiative that points at censorship on a number of levels. This quote about how DISINFORMATION is not actually FALSE is quite amazing. See: https://reclaimthenet.org/sweden-good-disinformation-is-basically-true/
