Facing the Beast
Facing the Beast
and dropping a Bombshell - a regulatory lawyer explains the set-up ... Why HEALTH CANADA is approving unsafe vaccines and what should be done about that
Dr. Naomi Wolf’s recent Substack post “Facing the Beast” is an excellent read. First, it is dramatic as it outlines how she is trapped in her house by a massive bear. Then it makes the analogy between the beast that is the bear and the beast that are these Covid-19 injectable products, and the forces that have unleashed them on the population.
The mindboggling and appalling list of adverse events resulting from the use of the COVID-19 injectable products (aka ‘the jab’) should be well known to every regulator by now.
Already in April 2022, the UK and CDC regulators were aware of how the “jab” was not living up to its promises to break the chain of transmission, as Dr. Meryl Nass, among countless other experts, and Dr. Rachelle Walenksy herself, had pointed out:
There is no way Canadian regulators are NOT aware that the “safe and effective” (and necessary) narrative is not standing up to scrutiny.
Stories about the 400% increase in children’s casket sales since the approval of the shots for the older children are of course still hush hush in the censored, old school, government gatekeeper media. In fact the majority of the points on vax-injury advocate (and former tech mogul) Steve Kirsch’s website would never make it past mainstream censorship policies, yet you would think that somehow, some where Canadian regulators would be keeping their finger on the pulse of their field. See
And yet…
OTTAWA, July 14 (Reuters) - Canada on Thursday authorized Moderna Inc's (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccine for babies as young as 6 months old, making it the country's first vaccine against coronavirus for children under 5, Health Canada said.
Canada had been offering Moderna's Spikevax vaccine to children above 5 since March, and the latest authorization means some 1.7 million more children are now eligible for inoculation against COVID, according to Health Canada.
"After a thorough and independent scientific review of the evidence, Health Canada has determined that the benefits of this vaccine for children between 6 months and 5 years of age outweigh the potential risks," Health Canada said in a statement. https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/canada-approves-modernas-covid-vaccine-children-aged-6-months-older-2022-07-14/
What staff at Health Canada should be admitting is that for whatever reasons and by whichever forces, ITS HANDS ARE TIED and/or they are CAVING IN to FEAR or COWARDICE by rubber stamping vaccine approval applications. There is no real peer-reviewed and iron clad “thorough and independent scientific review.” Instead, the only test that Health Canada is obliged to undertake is whether: “The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks.”
In other words, according to regulatory lawyer Shawn Buckley, if the cherry-picked data supplied by the vaccine manufacturers to Health Canada meets the above test (yup, the factoids you are choosing to share could show more benefits than risks) according to whoever wrote the policy, Health Canada is obligated to give it the stamp of approval. On Thursday, June 23, Mr. Buckley testified to the panel of the Citizens’ Hearing put on by members of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, an organization that certainly is not unknown to Health Canada officials. His testimony rips apart the trust that any of us still might have had in the objectivity of the entire approval process. Like the lurking bear referenced above, the forces that have corrupted the regulatory approval process need to be banished from our country for good. Mr. Buckley stated:
…[the reason] in Canada, we believe they [the vaccines] are safe and effective is because our regulatory body, Health Canada, has approved it. And we believe that Health Canada only approves vaccines if they're proven to be safe and effective, and this is Health Canada's message, so they they began on the Pfizer vaccine with the sentence: “All COVID-19 vaccines authorized in Canada are proven safe, effective and of high quality.” This is an outright lie, this is what we call propaganda in a police state. It's absolutely false.
…So here we are, we believe that these have been proven to be safe and effective and in the normal course of events, that would be true. So these vaccines are called new drugs and they would have to go through what we call the new drug approval process.
And just to kind of synthesize that and make it simple, there are basically three things that have to be proven to get through the normal drug approval process. First, you have to prove the drug is relatively safe.
Second, you have to prove that it's effective, that it does what … you want to use it for and then, if you prove safety and if you've proved efficacy, then flowing from that, the third thing is this cost benefit analysis. Is this a good idea to put it on the market? We're going to get more benefit than, you know, suffer harm. It's really just common sense. Now people believe that's what's happened for the vaccines, but that's not what happened. So literally, weeks before, not even a month, literally weeks before Pfizer submitted their application, the Federal Government came out with an interim order that placed a new test. So Pfizer and all of these COVID-19 vaccines are approved under this new test, and I just want to correct something… A couple of other presenters have suggested that yeah Pfizer was first approved under this interim order test, but then later on got reapproval under the drug regulations, and that is smoke and mirrors.
So Pfizer did get approved first under this test I'm going to explain to you, but then this test was put into the drug regulations, only for COVID-19 drugs, so when Pfizer and the other companies, then transitioned from the interim approval under the drug regulations to a permanent approval, it's the same test so make no mistake, all of the Pfizer approvals, both for adults and children — and when you understand this test I hope your blood runs cold that we've approved this for kids — has been under the single test, there's there hasn't been two separate tests for the Pfizer vaccine.
… it is so important that the panel understand, this is a mandatory test. If Pfizer can meet this test, Health Canada HAS TO APPROVE, even if Health Canada doesn't want to. So Health Canada, listen carefully, Health Canada could actually believe the vaccine’s unsafe. Health Canada can believe the vaccine doesn't work, Health Canada can believe that the benefits don't outweigh the risk, it doesn't matter. If Pfizer can meet this test BY LAW Health Canada MUST approve.
So keep in mind this is mandatory. Health Canada has no discretion, if this test is met.
Now I'm going to read this test in two parts. I'm going to read the first part twice and the first part, really is the test, and then the second part weakens the first part, so, and now, when I read the first part, “Minister” that's Health Canada, but listen for the word “conclusion.” It's very important.
So here's the test:
The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks. Again: The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risk.
Now there's three important things to pay attention here: Pfizer doesn't have to prove the vaccine’s safe, it's not a requirement. Pfizer doesn't have to prove the vaccine works, it's not a requirement and even though we have risk/benefit language in this test, Pfizer doesn't have to prove the benefits outweigh the risk. That's not what this says. Listen: the Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion, this doesn't have to be the minister’s conclusion. It …doesn't say “sufficient evidence for the Minister to conclude.” What this means is that Pfizer can pull from all this clinical data evidence points that would support the conclusion. Now Health Canada can come to the opposite conclusion that the benefits don't outweigh the risk, but that’s not the test. All Pfizer has to do here is cherry pick evidence to support the conclusion and, look at a dictionary, I mean a conclusion is synonymous with inference or opinion. So they just have to do that and … Health Canada can totally disagree or Health Canada could be in the position, I mean think about it, we have not had long term safety or efficacy data. Health Canada's likely in the position where they honestly go: “Well, I don't know, I’m uncertain.” Oh, but the government took care of that!!
So I'm going to carry on with the test, I’ll start at the beginning and I'll carry on and how it's undermined. So the Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion that the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks having regard to the uncertainties relating to the benefits and risk. So basically the government of Canada has directed Health Canada, for the first time in drug history, if Health Canada is uncertain ever before “I'm not sure what the benefits are, I'm not sure if this is safe” they don't approve, because the company has to prove it. But here the test is: Well, not only do they not have to prove safety, not only do they not have to prove efficacy, this can all be uncertain and that's okay! You, so Health Canada, you can be completely unsure the benefits outweigh the risk, but as long as there's evidence that could support that conclusion, you have to approve.
It gets worse. I'll start at the beginning it's hard to believe it gets worse.
“The Minister has sufficient evidence to support the conclusion the benefits associated with the drug outweigh the risks, having regard to the uncertainties relating to the benefits of risk and the necessity of addressing the urgent public health need related to COVID-19.” So they're putting a legal presumption in there a danger basically, to force Health Canada to approve it.
So let's talk about about children, because Health Canada could be in the position when they're assessing “Do we approve this for children?”
Where Health Canada's going “ Well we can't actually find evidence of a single death in North America, let alone Canada of a healthy child from COVID.” And Health Canada could be looking at Canada government statistics and go: “Well statistically, even if we accept, you know, the COVID deaths for kids that have been reported and just ignore that they weren't healthy kids.”
A child in Canada, my understanding is 53 times more likely to be violently murdered than to die of COVID, and Health Canada could be aware of this, but it doesn't matter because there's a legal presumption of an urgent public health risk. So … we've had this experience as a nation where we've literally been terrorized to participate in the human experience with the belief that it's justified because it's proven to be safe and it's proven to be effective, but Pfizer never had to prove that it was safe. Pfizer never had to prove it was effective and Pfizer never had to prove that the benefits outweigh the risk… I just simply cannot see that it would be possible at all for Pfizer to ever get through the regular drug approval process where they'd actually have to prove safety. Where they'd have to prove efficacy and where they have to prove or show that the benefits outweigh the risk. So we've basically been in the situation where the Emperor has no clothes, where we based all of these actions on a premise without anyone actually looking that the test is changed.
With his 27- year long career as a lawyer, Shawn Buckley has lectured on and been called as an expert witness on Canada’s Food and Drug legislation and was well equipped to testify to the panel on this matter. (See: https://zeroanthropology.net/2022/06/28/day-2-of-a-citizens-hearing-examining-canadas-covid-response/ scrolling down past other speakers or hear him directly at the 3 hour, 11 minute mark on Day 2 Recording 2 of the Citizens’ Hearing as posted here: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/)
Health Canada somehow doesn’t have the procedure or the political will to push back on those behind the very recently changed test. Likewise, it has not demanded complete data sets from Pfizer. When that was done by Japan over a year and a half ago, Pfizer begrudgingly shared their evidence in animal models that the mRNA delivery vehicle makes its way through the circulatory network till it arrives where the vessels are the tiniest…and so mRNA teaches spike protein production to the cells of the liver, heart, lungs, spleen, ovaries, brain first — with many of those organs now subjected to the resulting vax-induced blood clotting disorders at the heart of so many of the “mysterious” “sudden deaths” seen in Canada since the start of the vax rollout. When Canadian vaccine developer, Dr. Byram Bridle, shared the English translation of that biodistribution information with fellow scientists, he was ostracized by many of his peers. (https://www.bitchute.com/video/7hSCduKKYN0K/).
The world will forever be grateful to U.S. District Judge Mark Pittman (Texas) who ruled out of principle, that Pfizer and the FDA would NOT be granted their request to keep trial and implementation data concealed for s e v e n t y - f i v e years. Thankfully researchers like the group Dr. Wolf referred to in her article now have access to the data and can see for themselves how very far from the truth any of Pfizer’s claims have been all along - And by extension, how fraudulent the vax related statements coming from governments associated with World Economic Forum aligned BigTech/BigPharma/BigFinance/BigMedia/ conglomerates, etc. have been. See https://phmpt.org/ and https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Pfizer_Data_Drop.pdf for starters.
Recently, Uruguay also demanded full data sets (including signed contractual agreements between its health department and the vaccine manufacturers) and put children’s injections on hold. This is what WE SHOULD BE DOING instead of relegating another 1.7 million (our tiniest and least able to provide consent) to the inevitable life-long dangers of a compromised immune system at best and a shortened life-span at worst.
Meanwhile, fellow regulatory staff at the CDC & NIH are resigning in protest as they cannot in good conscience reconcile what they are being asked to pretend about vaccine safety with what they (and everyone else) can see in the data. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-11015235/Health-experts-quitting-NIH-CDC-droves-embarrassed-bad-science.html?ito=social-twitter_dailymailus
Better than mass resignation over mass vaccination would be a movement among all of Government of Canada staff to “work to rule” i.e. to come to work each day but ONLY attend to a minimum number of their regular tasks - choosing instead to devote the majority of their time catching up with the rest of Canadians. Country wide, Canadians are appreciating the independent investigative news outlets whose sources have not just been limited to government funded propaganda machines - where “nary is heard a critical word” - where the everyday realities related to early treatment and vax injuries are not being pooh-poohed as “misinformation” but instead are being studied as the lifelines that they are. Here is a call to all government workers - spend your upcoming week working on the job of informing yourselves of what many already know so you can better support yourselves, your families and your fellow citizens.
Learn to spot the fallacies in the COVID-19 related verbiage you are subjected to.
Understand that until now you have been inundated with only “one side of the story.” See: https://cansef.ca/videos/the-pandemic-in-a-nutshell-have-you-learned-both-sides/
For your own safety, that of your children and elders, neighbours and colleagues, we should all be “in this together” fighting the beast that is the corporate rollout of the profit machine, keeping us all huddled in silent isolation in our homes with ineffective weapons. It is only the combined force of Canadians that will
identify the culprit and its motives
jointly free us of the terror and devastation it has caused
prevent our government decision makers from once again falling victim to such fascism (where governments do the bidding of BigCorp).
Find out who was behind the change in the drug approval process that Mr. Buckely referenced above and work to get that changed back again to the way it was.
SEND URGENT MEMOS to all pharmacists re: the need to disregard the previous directives for the 3rd and 4th shots. And to all provincial medical colleges to urge them to overturn the bans on early treatment.
Do all you can to ensure that the life saving tool of D-Dimer testing is provided as a follow up to every patient who already received 1 or more of the COVID-19 injections.
Prioritize the proper funding of care for the vaccine injured while keeping people safe from coming injuries.
Start your “daily professional development hours” here:
Re: COVID prevention: if you have not yet had COVID-19 learn what proven therapeutics can help strengthen immunity — and if you have been double, triple or quadruple vaxxed, you may be surprised to know that the more times the body is given this shot, the LESS it is able to fight off infections of all kinds. See: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/
Re: Vax harms: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/stop-the-shots/; https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/the-pfizer-inoculations-for-covid-19-more-harm-than-good-2/; https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/vaccine-adverse-event-tracking/
Vax news you are not hearing in the media: up to May 8, 2022 Scroll just three blocks from the top and start here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page13.html
For more recent stories, start with the above-mentioned Substack by Steve Kirsch
plus also:
https://brownstone.org/tag/vaccines/ and https://brownstone.org/tag/public-health/
and
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/health-and-nutrition/ (for starters)
Re: Masking - See how a persistent lack of oxygen and an overabundance of CO2 is not the best over the long term. See Going Mask Free here: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page29.html
To see what it means to really “follow the science” and to apply the circular scientific process - of which questioning is an integral part, see: https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page3.html#content2-30.
Here you can follow along with some “think aloud” protocols of what happens when critically minded citizens try to understand why and how government policy makers are being left out of the information cycle.
https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page8.html#menu1-21 See 02 at the bottom half of the page as well as any other components.
To become a more critical consumer of propaganda of any type, a refresher of logical fallacies and other “Muckracking Tools” might be in order. The sample text being referred to here is one by Klaus Schwab, the CEO of the World Economic Forum. (You may or not be aware of the high regard in which he holds our Prime Minister. It appears the feeling is mutual.)
https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/PART_H.pdf
And if the words of our Prime Minister re: the fringe and dangerous nature of freedom loving Canadians have made you fear various aspects of the population, we invite you to focus on what unites us all - and realize that we have let outside forces divide us. Together we can chase away that bear. See: Building Common Ground https://followingthecovidscience.8b.io/page19.html
In closing, know that there is a sizable majority of Canadians who have already awakened to the interconnections between many of the bewildering news stories that are and are not widely being reported and for whom the content in this post is already well-known. There will be many who can answer any questions you may have.
Please reach out. This beast can only be beaten jointly.
"Any kind of crisis can be good. It wakes you up." Ryan Reynolds