Dear Doctor (Part 2)
But not just for Doctors (here is a list of links to evidence-based information for anyone to share far and wide)
Dear Doctor… here is more…
»»»»NEWSFLASH»»» If you have no time to read letters, but you can listen to a speech while doing other things that don’t require mental focus (like making supper), please start this video podcast style at the 1 hour 12 minute mark to hear US pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole summarize the current litany of COVID-19 vaccine harms as documented in the peer reviewed literature (and/or via online professional information sharing) https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/multimedia/aseem-malhotra-press-conference/
Prior to Dr. Cole, the recording includes the eminent UK physician Dr. Asseem Malhotra. Both of them are leading the call for a COMPLETE END TO COVID VACCINATION - information all medical professionals and lay people need to understand at this point in time.
As for the rest of this post…
This is being written like a letter than can be customized and shared with medical practitioners by…
patients with LONG COVID,
or “regular” Covid,
or those with a sudden onset of mysterious illnesses that are NOT being linked to either the COVID vaccines or COVID illness after effects.
Or patients, in particular the elderly and/or those who have already had COVID-19 AND who have already taken multiple COVID-19 shots AND are now faced with messaging that they need to continue taking boosters, as well as the annual flu shot for protection this coming winter.
anyone else concerned wishing to reach out to their doctors, dentists, pharmacists, etc. with this information. The intent is that this letter can be given by these patients to their physicians as an ice breaker to open up further discussion and start the process of awareness building. Of course, different sections need to be omitted/altered as individual situations warrant.
To my dear Doctor/Specialist/Pharmacists … etc.
As you know, lately I have been having symptoms such as ….
The more I think about it, these seem to have come on after my illness (diagnosed or not) with COVID or COVID like symptoms. (Or after my first, second, third, etc. dose of COVID-related vaccination.) etc.
»»»» Please know that I have become aware of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance (CCCA), an association of over 700 Canadian academics/professors/ physicians/ pharmacists/dentists/clinicians/clinical researchers, and other health professionals who work with COVID-19 patients and/or are very closely monitoring COVID-related peer reviewed studies from around the world. These include the various preventative and treatment protocols compiled by the clinical care professionals at the Front Line Covid Critical Care Alliance in the USA, known as FLCCC. Please see: https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/
The CCCA also provides links to a number of evidence-based medical service providers here: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/contact-us/medical-care-service-providers/ I have reached out to one of them (The Telehealth Service at https://www.covidtelehealth.ca/) to find out what information they can provide based on their COVID expertise that you (as a generalist) may not yet have heard. This is what I have found out by contacting COVID Telehealth: XXXX
I of course wish to stay the course with your medical guidance but I am wanting to know whether you are open to seeing how my current prescriptions can further be augmented by recommendations drawn from the FLCCC protocols - especially in the case of symptoms that seem to have appeared without cause or explanation and that are still ongoing despite your best efforts in my case.
OR I am hoping you are willing to contact COVID Telehealth in order to find out more about the FLCCC protocols being used to treat various forms of spike protein related inflammation (whether as Long Covid or COVID vaccine injuries) so that you can expand your repertoire in the case of next steps in my care.
OR Please note the list of URLs related to how COVID vaccine products produce MORE HARM THEN GOOD on page 5 here: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/The-COVID-19-Inoculations-More-Harm-Than-Good-REV-Dec-16-2021.pdf This information (including evidence of conflicts of interests) was already KNOWN in December 2021, but was most likely never shared with you by any of the medical bodies who would normally be involved in keeping Canadian doctors, pharmacists, etc. up to date in their practice.
»»»» I am also aware that according to blood testing done by the Kinexus lab at the University of British Columbia, the majority of Canadians already have lasting immunity from previous infections of COVID or other Corona viruses.
UBC Faculty of Medicine professor Dr. Steven Pelech (also Chief Science Officer of Kinexus) looks for multiple markers and can also document whether people had immunity even BEFORE getting any COVID shots. They have found evidence that getting the shots after an infection can degrade naturally acquired immunity putting people more at risk of having a compromised immune system. Here is a summary of the findings of the first round of studies along with an invitation to get on the wait list for the second round that is now open.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1r5SmyT8VELe-o-vaLKk6gUYcl0UOBGzI7rqRQ5ufk7Q/edit?usp=sharing (There is a $99 fee this time around.)
Here are links to various talks given by Dr. Pelech on this topic:
- to the Youth and Families Monday night Zoom Call on September 19, 2022: https://www.bitchute.com/video/XkuKt4MbH1cY/
- a short talk directed at youth and young adults: https://cansef.ca/interviews/interview-with-dr-steven-pelech/ (fewer details)
- a longer one as part of the Maryanne and the Professor series https://www.bitchute.com/video/4UNQCMFOHA12/
- and for science diehards, an even more complex look at topics related to immunity: https://rumble.com/v1efue7-immunity-to-sars-cov-2-round-table-w-drs.-steven-pelech-and-james-lyons-wei.html.
»»»»» I am also aware of the following letters recently sent to Canadian Public Health officials, the federal Minister of Health and others which outline the very latest in scientific findings. Please take the time to read them as they provide compelling evidence against the use of continued boosting, etc. that has not yet been reported elsewhere:
This OPEN LETTER TO THE FEDERAL HEALTH MINISTER explains the key difference between “traditional vaccines” and “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines” and why having overlooked this difference in the approval process has lead to Canadians being misled as to the “safe and effective” nature of these injections.
The introduction of this letter is crucial information that all Canadians need to understand in order to make sense of why on the one hand people can claim that these products are SAFE while on the other hand people can claim that they are totally UNSAFE. (Boldface added.)
Traditional vaccines contain a known amount of the target antigens or proteins of the pathogen to create an immune response. They do not require a person’s cells to manufacture and present them on their membrane surface at an uncontrolled rate and level. It is this very difference that has been overlooked when assessing the safety, dosage, and pharmacokinetics of BNT162b2 (PfizerBioNTech mRNA Vaccine) and its components/mRNA encoded product. Therefore, BNT162b2 is not like any other vaccine that has ever been used successfully in the past as the innate immune response is initially targeted directly against one’s own cells rather than against the invading pathogen. Unlike traditional vaccines, in which the formulation contains a known concentration of viral antigen, BNT162b2 does not contain the viral antigen that triggers the immune response. Instead, the mRNA directs the body’s cells to manufacture the viral spike protein in vivo at levels that may vary over 100-fold amongst vaccinees, and it is that very difference that has been overlooked when assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of BNT162b2 and its components/mRNA encoded product. Individuals produce variable amounts of spike protein due to their genetics, age, hormonal, and nutritional status, batch of vaccine they receive, and so on. This problem was further exacerbated by the arbitrary decision to mix different vaccine products from various manufacturers (including adenoviral DNA biologics no longer permitted for use) assuming that they were simply interchangeable. The concentration and exact composition of the encoded viral spike protein was never determined in any of the Pfizer’s studies as required for other biologics. Therefore, the distribution of the encoded spike protein, and the safety of BNT162b2 was based upon assumptions. This product should never have gone into clinical trials, let alone on the market as COMIRNATY.
WHY COVID BOOSTERS ARE UNNECESSARY AND NOT RECOMMENDED This point by point rebuttal of recent booster recommendations by the National Advisory Committee on Immunizations (NACI) introduces readers to the key flaws in the data used by NACI to date.
Here are some of the key points made by members of the Scientific and Medical Advisory Committee of the CCCA as items not considered by NACI.
• There are NO safety data regarding the administration of boosters every 3, 6 or 9 months, and this fact is openly stated on page 10 of the document. This point alone precludes any recommendation regarding boosters’ administration.
• The studies used as evidence to claim the effectiveness of boosters regarding severe outcomes do not present an analysis of adverse events, without which, it is impossible to sufficiently perform a risk/benefit analysis that proves, without doubt, that the benefits of boosters outweigh the risks.
• The evidence that boosters reduce the frequency of severe outcomes (i.e., hospitalizations) is weak, and the potential benefits appear to be extremely short-lived.
• There is evidence that natural immunity alone provides similar or better protection as vaccination and hybrid immunity (Altarawneh et al., 2022).
• It appears assumed that immunity and protection is given almost exclusively by antibodies, with NO consideration of T cell immunity, which provides key protection against all intracellular infections, such as viral infections.
Another document produced and circulated by the CCCA is a CRITIQUE OF RECENT STUDIES RECOMMENDING VACCINES IN PREGNANCY (in Lancet & Medscape). Points raised include that it is impossible to declare the safety of any product after following the patients for ONLY SEVEN days; that critical aspects of fetal development were ignored; and that while Moderna’s animal studies did show evidence of harm from these injectables, this evidence was ignored. The authors state that had the mRNA injections been replaced with Thalidomide, according to the study design and the structure of research questions used here, it too would have appeared “safe”.
These articles purporting vaccine safety in pregnancy remain problematic. Given the growing body of evidence, that these mRNA gene therapy COVID-19 vaccine products are actually harmful to pregnancy and reproductive health, it seems unconscionable to suggest and promote use of these products in pregnancy. It appears that the regulatory bodies have failed in their duty to protect us and have betrayed our trust. Perhaps it may simply be too hard for us to actually recognize this betrayal. Until we do, we are all at risk of blindly adopting potentially harmful policies.
Canadian Physician Dr. Christopher Shoemaker has also been speaking out on the lack of evidence for the safety, efficacy and necessity of COVID-19 vaccine products for children. On September 26, 2022 he and Karen Rucas OT, wrote LETTER TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT (specifically Drs. Tam, Njoo, Kochhar, Deeks and the Public Health Agency of Canada and the National Advisory Committee on Immunizations Representatives) to raise these two issues:
the need for physicians to be able to use the proven and safe antiviral medications that have currently been denied to them. This is especially urgent as the multiply vaccinated are now the most likely to be immunocompromised and at risk in the coming winter cold & flu season. Expecting more COVID-19 vaccine products to protect them will only put them further at risk.
the fact that worldwide countries are recognizing the need to STOP injecting children (and others) with these products, while Canada continues recommending their use.
It’s difficult to comprehend that health experts in these countries are not satisfied with the safety and/or efficacy outcomes of these experimental inoculations for children yet Canadian health authorities are rolling the dice on our children’s safety
»»»»» I am aware that prohibitions against vaccine exemption letters and against the use of early antiviral treatments for COVID-19 have been a driving force in medical practice these days. You may be interested in a fellow physician’s comments re: the provincial colleges modus operandi here. Additionally, please note this letter to provincial colleges from the CCCA sent a year ago. There is work underway documenting the efficacy of protocols that DO NOT include those specific therapeutics banned by provincial bureaucrats etc. which could give doctors like yourselves more flexibility to practice the art of medicine despite the various barriers. For an understanding of the similarities between SARS-CoV-2 and malaria (i.e. information the colleges would not have been aware of when they blocked the use of hydroxychloroquine as a COVID treatment) please look into work documented by Dr. Jessica Rose here. This article on hemoglobin also brings up malaria but also the steep rise in what may well be spike protein induced prion disease and porphyria.
I am also urging you to follow the news of an upcoming conference to be held in Florida (as well as online) that will focus specifically on spike protein induced symptoms. Dr. Paul Marik (of the USA) and others have been documenting the endless ways in which spike protein (either from the SARS-CoV-2 virus OR generated by the body via mRNA vaccines, or provided to the body via other types of COVID vaccine products) have the potential to impact EVERY SINGLE body system in any combination leading to countless implications, syndromes, etc. Listen to Dr. Marik speak about the need for this conference here.
It has long been known that the WHO, the FDA, the NIA, the CDC have been compromised by the overreach possible via their reliance on Big Pharma’s funding. Because of this, concerned and capable non-aligned medical & legal professionals have founded an alternate organization called the World Council for Health. Please visit their website for recordings of previous conferences as well as weekly events that allow for all to learn from eminent scientists, researchers, clinical physicians, etc. who have been driving the development of emergent COVID-19 knowledge these past few years. The site also includes evidence backed practical advice for all to read and hopefully follow. https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/ Here is an insightful letter by members of this council addressed to “The Silent Doctor” encouraging physicians not to look the other way while harms are being committed.
»»»»» Within the Canadian context, I wish to urge you to follow posts by vaccinologist Dr. Byram Bridle who has been sharing new peer reviewed publications highlighting various pathways of harm as they become known. Please see:
His recent topics include more on myocarditis, mRNA in breastmilk, menstrual problems and more. His September 19th post on Moderna’s CEOs comments that spike protein goes straight to the heart WILL NOT BE ON MAINSTREAM MEDIA and will NOT BE FORWARDED to you by anyone at the College of Physicians. Instead, some months back, we heard that doctors received copies of the article claiming that the unvaccinated are a danger to the vaccinated which, if vaccines are safe and effective, would be a non-starter in the first place. It was Dr. Bridle who followed that article up with evidence of how its author, Dr. David Fisman had incorrectly used data that when done properly would come to the complete opposite conclusion. If you, the recipients of the original article DID NOT RECEIVE the follow up correction by Dr. Bridle, then it may very well be that your medical educators were promoters of “fake news.” A young Canadian has taken it upon herself to virtually “bring together” Drs. Fisman and Bridle in this short collection of quotes: https://cansef.ca/quick-reads/are-the-unvaccinated-endangering-the-vaccinated/ It would have been incumbent for medical organizations to push for an actual debate with evidence from both sides of the argument to allow for physicians and pharmacists like yourselves to come to a deeper understanding of the issues at play.
Another high profile Canadian health expert in evidence-based medicine, Dr. Paul Alexander has compiled a list of scientific references related to COVID-19 injections here:
Likewise, the team at the Canadian Adverse Events Reporting System (CAERS) link to peer-reviewed publications outlining a whole gamut of mechanisms of vaccine harm. Please see: https://caers.info/adverse-event-publications/ and familiarize yourself with this reporting system, given the high degree of censorship occurring with the reporting system run by Health Canada.
It is my hope in writing you that you will become aware (as this US physician has)
of the huge risks involved in the use of particularly the mRNA COVID-19 vaccine products and with the help of members of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, you may be able to find ways to advise and guide patients accordingly. Know that you are not alone. For more on accessing justice for the vaccinated who have sustained harm, please see:
Know also that we have all been subjugated to an unprecedented propaganda campaign. Dr. Piers Robinson, co-Director of the Organisation for Propaganda Studies and convener of the Working Group on Syria, Media and Propaganda, has put together an insightful report on our current world situation:
Coronavirus Deafening Silences: propaganda through censorship, smearing and coercion
Here are some excerpts:
In the case of the COVID-19 event, propaganda has been deployed across democracies on an unprecedented scale. In order to gain compliance with the unorthodox and intrusive measures adopted during the COVID-19 event many forms of “non-consensual persuasion” have been employed, ranging from manipulated messaging designed to increase “fear levels” through to coercion. …
Part of this process of suppressing arguments and opinion involves superficially well-meaning attempts to manage what has been increasingly labelled as “misinformation” and “disinformation”. Elizabeth Woodworth documents the emergence of the so-called Trusted News Initiative (TNI) prior to the 2020 COVID-19 event which involved a coalition of mainstream/legacy media establishing a network that would serve to combat “misinformation” and “bias”. …
By 2020, according to Woodworth, the TNI had incorporated “Twitter, Microsoft, Associated Press, Agence France-Presse, Reuters, and the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism” and, predictably, adopted the role of tackling “harmful coronavirus disinformation”.
“When you tear out a man's tongue, you are not proving him a liar, you're only telling the world that you fear what he might say.”
― George R.R. Martin, A Clash of Kings
It should be no surprise that not only are many of the TNI-related tech companies active investors in the major vaccine manufacturing companies, the CEOs of these major media corporations sit alongside of the CEOs of pharmaceutical companies on the various platforms of the World Economic Forum (the major international non-governmental lobbying organization that has long been seeking to shape policy decisions of governments around the world).
Recent events prove how very successful this lobbying has been. When provincial premiers like Alberta’s Jason Kenny are on record has having met with pharmaceutical lobby groups over thirty times in 2020 (and even more often in 2021) you may well ask how often he met with advocates for the off-patent and repurposed safe and effective early treatment options…. It was clear that Premier Kenny was aware of how unscientific it is to use PCR test derived “case count figures” as a metric upon which to place a health care system response AND HE DID NOT TAKE ACTION on behalf of his citizens. (Instead, those Alberta pastors and physicians who spoke out publicly were jailed, fined, fired and stripped of their licenses under his watch.)
Yes, it is difficult to be come to terms with the idea that we as societies are being confronted with “creeping totalitarianism.” Many of your international colleagues have come to the understanding that we no longer have a SCIENCE PROBLEM. Instead it is now a COMMUNICATION PROBLEM. There is now sufficient medical science and evidence to demonstrate the utter lack of safety, necessity and efficacy of the COVID-19 vaccine products. Government promoted statements to the contrary do not stand up to scientific scrutiny. The challenge now is to reach out and communicate the preponderance of evidence-based information to all parties concerned. The even greater challenge is overcoming the difficulty of changing long held belief systems. Many people are slow to recognize that what were once trusted institutions have slowly crumbled away and collapsed under the weight of corporate corruption. They are hesitant to accept that “official” information is in fact contrary to science. And that its primary purpose is to maximize profit margins and control & silence opposition. It is time for the “well-intentioned yet ill-informed” segments of society to let go of their reticence and loyalty to what were formerly trusted institutions and to actually inform themselves of the 180 degree turn that happened while most of us were not paying attention.
In closing, I invite you to listen to this interview with Drs. Rob Verkerk, PhD, and Mark Trozzi, MD as they discuss how we need to unplug from BigPharma and focus on what supports health in a broader way. “We now have an opportunity to see how we redraw ‘health care.’” It looks like the medical profession is nearly ready to turn the corner on Big Corp controlled health care. Evidence-based discussion can no longer be silenced.
Remember:
“Rage and despair are crippling and to be avoided.”
“Love without justice is powerless.”
Dr. Mark Trozzi