Crucial Questions all Politicians need to answer
Not just leadership hopefuls - all policy and decision makers need to familiarize themselves with these questions - and ASKING THEM SHOULD NOT MAKE YOU AN OUTCAST!!
To all who pose questions to the provincial party leadership candidates and/or who comment on their leadership campaigns.
(We have kept the questions short by moving the lengthy ‘behind the scenes’ context lower down. However anyone ASKING these questions needs to understand the context out of which they arise as do all the members of each candidate's campaign team including of course, EACH CANDIDATE. These questions will be paramount in the minds of all who are attuned to these issues. See the series of Talk to Your Candidates brochures for an introduction to many of the issues outlined below: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/talk-to-your-candidates/
Added on August 7 - Dr. Meryl Nass (USA) proposes having all elected officials sign this pledge upon taking office. In addition to asking would-be party leaders the questions outlined below, you could add the question: “Would you be willing to sign a Canadian version of this Pledge?” Added the link to a father’s outrage in response to a pharmacist’s comment. See bold.
When in Alberta, 4 out of the 7 leadership candidates of the United Conservative Party state that they would likely reinstate lockdowns in the fall if the need arose and one is undecided (according to campaign materials from one of the two who would not) the question arises - how can 5 out of 7 highly intelligent, committed and compassionate people advocate for a public policy that has been scientifically proven an abject failure and at the heart of so much suffering, neglect, loss and yes, even suicides?
The answer has to do with where people are getting their information. We are now in a full on information war with the “minds and hearts” of people being the target. Highly compassionate and altruistic people have been “nudged” to believe in the “narrative” that, honestly only benefits those corporations who have conspired to have the exact correct “solution” to every problem just at the right time - think surgical masks, visors, PCR tests, Rapid Antigen tests…. how did they get to be available in such enormous quantities just as there was the public hue and cry for them… while building materials and other items are delayed indefinitely due to mysterious “supply chain issues”…. ?
People who review the scientific literature on the topic of lockdowns posted at https://brownstone.org/ for example, will know exactly why lockdowns are not a solution to be pursued. As federal and provincial leadership candidates participate in debates, interviews and Q & A sessions, and as we scan their websites for updates they post as a way to understand their take on issues of importance to us as some, like Dr. Leslyn Lewis is doing federally, it is hoped that the questions listed below will provide some much needed discussion, reflection, (re)thinking and movement forward.
The Overriding Issue: Plans to Manage Inevitable Outrage
There is one defining issue that needs to be addressed by ALL leadership hopefuls (currently in Alberta and Quebec, but eventually all around the country) as encapsulated in these two questions:
A: What plans will you put in place to deal with the public backlash (horror, disbelief, anger, despair) once the current widespread suppression of up to date peer-reviewed scientific, economic and socio-cultural information around SARS-CoV-2 is overcome and the public learns how much was known by officials about the clear LACK of safety, efficacy and necessity of COVID-19 vaccines and masking even BEFORE these measures were implemented here?
Outrage? What outrage? How many parents will need to go through this? https://rumble.com/v1f0ijn-father-confronts-pharmacist-after-his-7-year-old-son-is-vaccinated-and-deve.html (Warning: 7+ minutes of pure agony.)
B: What directives will you give your Health-Minister-to-be about: (Pick any you have time for)
1) removing the government misinformation still posted on provincial health websites re:COVID-19 (based on the status quo as of March 2020) and replacing it with currently publicly available data, analysis and best-practices/care-protocols such as the information shared by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance, the US-based Front-Line Covid Critical Care Alliance, the World Council for Health, etc.
2) extricating AHS from its ongoing involvement with the "Platform for Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare" and the The Global Coalition for Value in Healthcare of the World Economic Forum
3) releasing the current state of dependence of the provincial medical colleges on provincial ministerial orders and reinstating their former status of academic independence so that they can use actual evidence-based science upon which to develop guidance for their membership (instead of authoritarian control based on unscientific propaganda and mistruths)?
4) ensuring that the increasingly boosted COVID-19 patients (loss of immunity is an adverse consequence of repeated dosing of the vaccine) as well as all other categories of Post Covid-19 Injection Syndrome are properly cared for by medical staff aware of the science behind spike protein toxicity in the body - this means immediately increasing capacity in regular wards, ICU, assisted living and long term care homes, group homes and home care; immediately increasing training of nursing staff at all levels as well as pharmacists and physicians who have been out of the loop on vetted and peer reviewed treatment protocols and who, as Dr. Paul Marik has put it, don’t have the intellectual capacity or training to understand the system wide effects across all body systems that spike protein has. Many misdiagnose symptoms of post-exertional malaise, a key symptom also of another post-viral disease called myalgic encephalomyelitis, as simply “all in the head.” The toxicity of the artificially instigated production of this one engineered protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus belongs under close watch in a secured bioweapons lab and NOT in the bodies of 75% or more of our population. Dr. Marik is referenced in this must-see panel discussion between key advocates for early and preventative treatment of COVID-19 - previously the most cited in their fields and now vilified by “corporate fact checkers” who need to “manage the risk” they pose to company profits. Start at the 25 minute mark here to hear a retrospective of key developments in the science around COVID-19 by some of those who know it best: https://rumble.com/v1ejdup-crony-capitalism-big-pharma-and-vaccines-ft.-sen.-johnson-dr.-kory-dr.-malo.html
5) reinstating the Emergency Management plans that were in place in Alberta prior to the declared pandemic, and that were pushed aside in favour of the unscientific mandates that were followed instead.
More on question A:
The news of legal proceedings against provincial chief medical officers of health such as Dr. Deena Hinshaw and Dr. Bonnie Henry, as well as against the big names of Dr. Anthony Fauci, Albert Bourla, Bill Gates and many others cannot remain under wraps forever. When people connect the leading cause of death in Alberta (mysterious, unexplained) with the processes that the COVID-19 vaccines engender in the body; when figures in the Pfizer data showing that ONLY ONE healthy baby was born to a cohort of 29 injected women, with all the others stillborn or unviable in some way become known, along with pictures of long rubbery blood clots embalmers are now retrieving from the bodies of those injected, when studies finally start appearing in major journals such as the recent Lancet paper linking the suppression of the immune system with repeated doses of COVID-19 vaccines - then there will be such a livid backlash that will need a response.
As one writer puts it: My, my, my; the Covid-19 Experimental Materials Injection trains are, not surprisingly, losing their steam. These genocidal human “cattle car” trains are arriving, with great speed and urgency, at the appointed medical disembarkation stations. However, but not surprising, many of the trains’ “MEDICAL” engineers, conductors and porters are nowhere to be found. It appears they are all in the process of finding their Covid-19 invisibility cloak, lest a second Nuremberg Trial be convened. ...It's becoming glaringly obvious that a large number of the cattle cars’ COVID-19 injected passengers are becoming sicker each day, many have died, millions more have been seriously injured and will die. These human casualties (predictably) are being ignored. They are even being denied medical and governmental services and, sadly, their failing health reality swept under the rugs of plausible deniability, propaganda, misinformation and sociopathic censorship. Fortunately, a growing number of those, in the public arena, who are not firmly imprisoned in the Covid-19 mass psychosis, are breaking free from their induced trance. They are waking up to the reality that they have been duped. They have been misled and sacrificed in what can only be called the latest and greatest genocidal massacre of human beings in the history of the world. ...
This genocide has taken place with the eager participation and support of politicians, various courts, many police organizations, the preponderance of Mainstream and Social Media, educators, corporations, Big Pharma and the Medical Establishment. ...
[People] have finally seen that they have been duped, manipulated and taken advantage of by the very people who have sworn to protect them. https://peckford42.wordpress.com/2022/07/28/the-experimental-materials-injection-trains-are-losing-steam/
And the more people hear news not being provided by the networks who signed on to the Truth in Journalism scheme (where vaccine investing social media call the shot), the angrier they will get. News like this: "Risk of infection, hospitalization and death up to nine months after a second dose of COVID 19 vaccine." https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)00089-7/fulltext
As explained by one of the very few mainstream journalists to have permission by his network to actually talk about these matters, Tucker Carlson: A physician called Kenji Yamamoto made this observation about the data from The Lancet. He wrote this in a letter to the Journal of Virology and we're quoting "The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals eight months after the administration of two doses of COVID 19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals." Associated charts and statements indicate that "Among people around the age of 80 who have been double vaccinated, that would include people like Joe Biden, the per capita rate of medical incidences, including hospitalizations for death, is nearly twice as high as the rate of serious incidence for the unvaccinated." and "The piece also includes a chart showing negative vaccine efficacy for all ages after eight months for all participants in the study." (See the second half of: https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/tucker-carlson-bidens-covid-19-positive-test-steps-vaccine-message)
When…
more ethical journalists push their stations (or drop out and work independently) an allow for a comparison of "official statements" made to lure citizens to the vax-line up with a true accounting of current realities;
when people start counting the number of unexplained "sudden deaths" occurring among young people known to them as was done here for one week in July:
when when too many parents need to mourn the premature and unnecessary deaths of their children;
when all those who lost their livelihoods to lockdowns that did not reflect the science of disease transmission in the first place
and now when it is becoming increasingly clear that policies followed (health, climate, agricultural & monetary) appear to align with the "disruptive" nature of the technologies that continuously line the pockets of WEF members more than they make scientific sense,
then there will be a real call for accountability, the likes of which we have never seen before.
How will the candidate deal with the inevitable rift (and potential clash) between those who continue supporting the status quo - willingly closing their eyes to the consequences - and those who expect charges against and jail time for the CMOH and her deputies, the Minister and Deputy Minister of Health, the Premier, the politicians, employers, judges, policy makers all who blindly "trusted the science", scientific advisory panel members both provincially and federally, not to mention the heads of programming in all media outlets who ordered SILENCE while the killing and maiming went on?
What would be the candidates' reaction to sector by sector general strikes? We are starting to see the impact of mass-vaccination in the airline industry with injected pilots and cabin crew unable to safely perform their duties while in the air, (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/american-airlines-pilot-speaks-out-against-covid-jab-mandates-after-suffering-heart-attack-post-flight-2/) now grounding an entire industry as the remaining staff are stretched to provide service. What of a sector wide work-to-rule action by pharmacists who rise up to declare they will complete ALL of their other tasks, but they will no longer be providing COVID shots and boosters until their Colleges provide them with a legitimate, science based "debunking" of the evidence based science that has been available since at least June 2021?
How many toddler deaths will need to occur before there are widespread strikes in the early childcare worker sector as the only means to draw attention to the needless loss of young lives? Given that ZERO young children have died of COVID-19 the province, why is AHS messaging essentially invites people to give their young children the "added protection" that these products can provide against a non-threatening situation and leaving out any mention of known adverse events for a proper informed risk/benefit analysis?
There is no sense being particular about workplace OHS regulation for the tiniest puddle under a ladder for example if we are to completely ignore a much greater risk! How many grief counselors will we need to deploy to situations like this one in Australia once more Canadian babies and toddlers are jabbed, given what is known about the potential for spike protein-induced blood clotting to harm every system in the body?
How many more children are dying of the vax than of the "rare but serious complication called multisystem inflammatory syndrome (MIS-C)"? Until this larger context is provided in government publications, it cannot be said to be providing objective INFORMATION.
More on Question B:
1) According to https://www.alberta.ca/covid19-vaccine-myths-and-facts.aspx
"Delaying or refusing vaccination carries serious risks. Albertans who are not fully vaccinated account for 80% of patients in hospital and 90% of patients in ICU with COVID-19. It may also extend the need for public health measures to continue." These numbers are so out of date, it is pathetic. Compare them with data from July 12, 2022 "Where “Currently Hospitalized” indicates that 81% of the total Hospitalizations are in the Vaccinated Community, only 19% in the Unvaccinated - the Vast Majority of these are Boosted."
Given that the public health definition of "INFORMATION" is "DATA IN CONTEXT" and that much of government information is missing the context, i.e., the narrow time window during which data was collected; the incorrect assumptions that went into the parameters of various sets of mathematically modelled data; which factors were excluded from various data upon which government messaging relied, etc. it has increasingly become evident that the GOVERNMENT IS NOW PEDDLING DISINFORMATION. (See slides 7 - 17 and 28 - 33 here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1641807827730.pdf), part of a larger public education project found here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/1641807827730.pdf )
EVERY ONE of the statements on this page https://www.alberta.ca/covid19-vaccine-myths-and-facts.aspx and recycled throughout AHS messaging has been debunked by recognized peer-reviewed science but the statements by journalists, even medical journalists, as well as policy makers on all levels continue to draw from these myths. Scientific articles and institutes referenced are frequently limited to those tied through direct and indirect funding and other means to the pharmaceutical companies that make up the World Economic Forum's Platform for Shaping the Future of Health and Healthcare.
The vaccine helps the body fight off the virus, so that children are less likely to get COVID-19 and experience its symptoms. Here is some missing context: This vaccine product only teaches the body to make antibodies against ONE of the components of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (spike protein) and the number of these antibodies wanes after a several months. (The more doses of the vaccine products that are received, the faster the antibody wanes.) Spike protein is only one of the components of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. When children contract the virus naturally, their body fights it off and develops natural acquired immunity against ALL the components of the virus. Currently, Omicron sub variants are in circulation, and over 80% of the population has already developed immunity to it. The symptoms experienced are generally very mild. However, if a person has had repeated doses of COVID-19 vaccine products, symptoms are much more severe with increase hospitalization and death than in those who are not vaccinated. This is likely to be due to immunotolerance, in which the repeatedly dosed patient is unable to fight off the less pathogenic Omicron variants. This situation also predisposes multi-dosed people to contract many other common ailments, and reduces the body’s ability to fight off cancer. This is counterintuitive and flies against all the benevolent messaging regarding this vaccine product that we have been receiving from those we trusted. It is akin to busting the existence of Santa Claus after children have firmly believed what they had been told on the topic for some time.
And another piece of missing context - with way fewer ACE-2 receptors in children, the virus has fewer places to “stick around” for long enough to cause infection and symptoms. Children often acquire immunity to the virus, seemingly without getting sick.
Although children are less likely to get really sick from COVID-19, they can still spread COVID-19 to others. Here is some additional missing context: Peer reviewed research shows that children are far less likely to spread COVID-19 than first thought. For a child to become sufficiently ill in order to have the virus multiply enough to be successfully transmitted to others, the child must firstly be susceptible to illness. Healthy children are excluded here. Secondly, children also have fewer ACE-2 receptors, which means that if they contract the virus, it attains less of a foothold within their bodies. In other words the virus does not actually "invade the host" long enough in order to grow into a dose size sufficient enough to then be transmitted to a different susceptible "host." This is why informed medical professionals (if they did not need to fear censorship and loss of their medical licenses) would not advocate injection based on a misunderstanding of disease transmission principles. Readers of this document are invited to renew their understanding of the six principles of disease transmission as explained here by Dr. John Hardie https://www.bitchute.com/video/FtfeBjfPXqHB/ .
Scientists followed careful procedures when developing and reviewing the vaccines. Vaccines were available quickly because of dedicated research funding and an incredible level of international collaboration. .
Major missing context: While individual scientists likely were very careful within their own labs working on their own portions of the larger picture, pharma executives (or people under their purview) were actively finding ways to only show partial data in order to give the appearance that these vaccines were more effective than is truly the case. (See the repository of all the court ordered releases of Pfizer data here: https://phmpt.org/ and some initial analysis from three months ago here: https://r.8b.io/387157/assets/files/Pfizer_Data_Drop.pdf.) Now, three months later, sufficient evidence has been uncovered to lay innumerable fraud and other charges against Pfizer. Listen to data analyst Edward Dowd and Naomi Wolf discussing Pfizer fraud here using databases that the government has not been hiding - those of the funeral homes and insurance agents: https://www.bitchute.com/video/V3SzQxX75t2o/ This data includes a 40% increase in all cause mortality among working aged individuals over comparable time frames before COVID injections possible. Other context missing here is that patents on components of both the COVID-19 vaccine products AND the SARS-CoV-2 virus were applied for by members of the institute tied to Dr. Anthony Fauci even prior to 2019 https://archive.org/details/the-fauci-covid-19-dossier_202109. This means the origin story related to the bats in the Wuhan wet-market was nothing more than a clever narrative, Hollywood style. Dr. Fauci's connections to zoologist Dr. Peter Daszak and publications about making the SARS-CoV-2 virus more infectious for humans go back to 2014. Dr. Daszak is the middle man between Dr. Fauci and a certain biolab in Wuhan China and also a key figure in many of the American biolabs being uncovered and secured in areas of Ukraine now under Russian supervision). He is also the person who discussed the need for using media hype re: perceived dangers of a corona virus and that investor profits would follow. So while part of the statement by Health Canada is technically true, most readers would put them into a totally different context and as such they are definitely misinforming the public.
2) The World Economic Forum consists of many many more representatives of corporations than government representatives. In fact many corporate members are known for their application of "disruptive" technologies. One of the mandates of this platform is to "curate" information. It is clear that the "stakeholder capitalism" espoused by that organization involves the state holding its citizens hostage via fear-mongering and situations repeatedly involving the triad of "problem, reaction, solution." One notes how often the "Solution" completely falls into the playbook of these corporations that exert their influence over governments by indoctrinating a particular benevolent and one-sided world view into the "Young Leaders" that later take up space in many "progressive" governments. It is little wonder that widespread burnout is decimating our health care system when one of the major stresses on the psychological well-being of medical staff is the disconnect between the state-mandated directives upon their regulatory bodies and the subsequent illegal pressure and silencing under which they are being placed. It would be better for the mental well-being of all, if those who "curated" information related to the mitigation of SARS-CoV-2 to that sanctioned by members of the health-related platforms of the World Economic come clean and STOP doing so, allowing Canadians to know and hear what un-compromised science has been saying all along. Moving forward one should instead cite current peer-reviewed data grounded in a context free of BigPharma capture. If 28 US states have overturned the ban against proven early antiviral treatment such as ivermectin for the prevention and treatment of COVID-19 and COVID-19 injection related adverse events, there is no reason we cannot do the same. A political border should not change scientific realities. (Btw, "curated" is now the buzz-word for "kept in while all else is censored out.")
3) More on the situation with the colleges' coercion and lack of academic independence can be seen here: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-those-entrusted-with-providing
4) See Canadian Covid Care Alliance https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/ for example on the development and maintenance of immunity https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/?s=immunity the US-based Front-Line Covid Critical Care Alliance - https://covid19criticalcare.com/covid-19-protocols/ the World Council for Health, etc.https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/resources as well as this repository for sharing of findings among scientists and other analysts and the public - search vaccine; masking; lockdowns or any other related topic here: https://brownstone.org/ On close examination, one will find that the science being cited in media outlets whose ownership chain sits on the same boards, drinks the same champagne, goes to the same WEF events for example, will be inclined to vilify the science of the early treatment experts for example and point ONLY to the products of their fellow winers and diners. Astute journalists will for example, be able to acquire copies of the guest list of the most recent Davos gathering to verify this assertion.
As the numbers of vaccine injured rise, including in the younger demographics, we will need some kind of residential support for increasingly younger residents who will be disabled due to vaccine injuries the more boosters they take. Working families may not be able to properly care for (or afford to care for) a severely vaccine injured young person in the home. 12 year old Maddie deGaray is a case in point. https://www.lifefunder.com/maddie There are mothers, fathers and other breadwinners also in the same boat these days. AND UNLESS THE INJECTIONS ARE STOPPED IMMEDIATELY, THERE WILL CONTINUE TO BE NEW POTENTIAL VICTIMS months after every day injections are not stopped.
5) See: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media-resources/pandemic-alternative/