Backing up info re: C-19 mask & vaccine failure & danger with evidence in peer reviewed literature
Information to share when skeptical voices believe that it is dangerous to punch holes in the Pro-Vax/ Pro-Mask narrative
When long-time scientists or medical professionals in my circle of contacts feel uncomfortable hearing that COVID-19 vaccine products or boosters are failing, or that masks are ineffective and even harmful they may make comments like:
—> Please stop sending me this garbage. I have had multiple boosters and am just fine.
—> These vaccines have saved the lives of millions of people. To say that boosters kill is just nonsense.
—> Would you rather that everyone gets LongCovid and ends up debilitated as a result? It is so much better just to get vaccinated.
—> Don’t you realize how uncomfortable you are making everyone feel, when you insist on believing these conspiracy theories from the dark web?
—> If the sky was orange or the earth was flat it would be supported by testable and consistent facts that are published in peer reviewed journals.
—> I have more training in scientific research than you do, so I can recognize good research when I see it, but you are just sending me crap. I can’t find any good scientific evidence to back any of the claims of the people you follow.
—> You are harming society and yourself by following this false witch-hunt.
—> Stop reading those independent, unverified news sources - you should follow the big name news sources that are known for their reliability.
For starters, people could be referred to this peer-reviewed literature:
Peer Reviewed Scientific Articles re: inefficacy of mask mandates
1) This critique links to 10 peer reviewed studies re: the lack of scientific support for masking as a COVID mitigation strategy https://brownstone.org/articles/evidence-of-mask-induced-brain-fog/
2) Here are links to roughly 20 studies, some pre-COVID re: whether masking helps with influenza, and others involving COVID + hypoxia, or + plastic mask fibres in the lungs plus more https://brownstone.org/articles/the-mask-studies-you-should-know/
3) Here Dr. Paul E. Alexander (who has a specialty in evidence-based medicine and has previously worked internationally as well as for Health Canada) states: I present the masking ‘body of evidence’ below (n=167 studies and pieces of evidence), comprised of comparative effectiveness research as well as related evidence and high-level reporting. To date, the evidence has been stable and clear that masks do not work to control the virus and they can be harmful and especially to children. https://brownstone.org/articles/more-than-150-comparative-studies-and-articles-on-mask-ineffectiveness-and-harms/
Notice, that Brownstone.org is simply an access point to the internet for many scientific, legal and sociological articles which critical thinking academics are struggling to get published in “regular” scientific publications. This is possibly due to conflicts of interest on certain editorial boards. Often the writers cited in the links had extensive profiles on the National US PubMed database when writing about their pre-COVID specialties. Looking up Canadian epidemiologist Dr. Paul E Alexander in PubMed you would see his lengthy publication history - with posts at the World Health Organization (prior to it becoming as compromised through BigPharma ties as today) Health Canada and the US Department of Health and Human Services.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Paul+E+Alexander+COVID
Additionally, the medical and scientific professionals who make up the membership of the Canadian Covid Care Alliance have also been publishing research reviews, videos, interviews etc. on a range of COVID-19 related topics. See:
https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/?s=research
What follows is a bit of a dialogue with a person who has been conditioned into believing that what is known to be ineffective and unsafe is actually to be trusted…
Dear … Thank you so much for your reply. I know that by bringing these topics up I have pushed you into Kuebler-Ross’ Change Curve. Just like we go through phases in the process of mourning, so also do we go through phases when we are forced to encounter change… change that means we will eventually need to mourn the loss of what in German is called “unsere heile Welt” … our healthy/complete world - i.e. the worldview we have struggled to cobble together for ourselves after the last big time we encountered change. By this I mean the way we all had to build some kind of “uneasy peace” within our world views when COVID rocked our planet. For some of us that “uneasy peace” meant trusting that our governments and health agencies have done their due diligence and we could go along with their recommendations, abiding by lockdowns, masking, distancing and taking the COVID-19 shots and boosters.
For others of us the UNEASY part weighed heavier than the PEACE part of that phrase. Some of us were aware that pre-COVID, Pfizer for example, had been charged with the largest ever fraud fine in Pharma history, or that Moderna had ZERO previous record of satisfactory pharma development or even product sales prior to 2020. We could not understand what would have driven our governments to put their eggs in those dubious baskets. Some of us were aware of how governments in the past have not hesitated to sacrifice the lives of some of their citizens for the so-called “greater good” of their overarching visions (like US hegemony in the world, etc. etc.) Those of us familiar with feminist Naomi Wolff’s interviews with women who experienced the slide from democracy into fascism in a range of countries were very wary of all this talk of governments forbidding doctors from following the Hippocratic Oath, taking away their rights to practice medicine by threatening to bankrupt them by the suspension of their medical licenses if they deviated from the Big Brother type of surveillance and control.
So now your reactions reflect exactly the SHOCK and DENIAL phases of that change curve.
The only way I can help you through these inevitable stages is to tell you that I hit the SHOCK phase around April 2021 when I was hit by the enormity of plans to inject instructions to MAKE SPIKE PROTEIN into the body when SPIKE PROTEIN is the component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that CAUSES the symptoms of COVID. I understood that anything injected in the body would eventually travel down the blood stream (and not stay in one place in the arm) I understood that no good could possibly come of a massive OVERproduction of ONE element, as is the case with too many porphyrins produced in people with porphyria as the body always seeks homeostasis. Everyone one of us who is working to stop the shots went through these change curve stages at different times and rates. You are not alone! LOTS of us were in your position at some point since the start of this COVID nightmare.
The biggest issues you raised are around the sources of the information I had shared with you. At the start of this post I addressed that matter and now I follow with my responses to some of your other comments.
I’m 2 shots and 3 boosters in
There is so much I could say here, but essentially even if you do not believe ME, what evidence do you have that these boosters are effective, given that it has only been about 19 months since these shots were first available and you have now been told to take these shots 5 times? What had you been told about their threshold of efficacy? I can almost guarantee you did not see yourself signing on for a perpetual prescription when you took the first 2 shots.
and doing great
And what evidence do you have to ensure that you do not have any micro-clotting? The evidence now is that many more people have various markers of vaccine damage (elevated D-dimers, etc.) that put them at risk of cardiovascular and neurological adverse events than they are aware of. This is why a good chunk of the 93 Canadian doctors who were multiply boosted succumbed to SUDDEN DEATH because they, like you, were not aware of the state of internal damage. Former U of A oncologist Dr. William Makis has been looking up the obituaries of these Canadian docs (including about 5 Albertans) and you can read about that here: https://gettr.com/user/makismd or you can listen to him talk here at the 34 minute mark: https://rumble.com/v1q176a-justice-for-the-vax-moving-forward-western-canada-tour-in-edmonton-ab.html. See also https://brightlightnews.com/trailer-90-sudden-or-unexpected-canadian-doctor-deaths-dr-william-makis-md/
as are millions of people
While millions of people have taken one or more of these injections, there are also millions of people (worldwide) who have not. In Canada roughly 6 million people did not take a single COVID-19 shot while 28 million have not had any shots/boosters in the last six months, despite the pressure to maintain an “up to date” status. The majority of those hospitalized, in ICU and unfortunately dying are now proving to be those with multiple doses of these COVID-19 vaccine products.
Data Analysist Sheldon Yakiwchuk pointed out back in May that there had been a tipping point. Comparing Total Deaths as of April 17 over Total Deaths as of April 10, Health Canada shows greatest increases among those who had taken the shots (160 dying with one booster, i.e. 1995 minus 1835, etc.) and only ONE death that week in the UNvaccinated - in other words, in that pivotal week 99.6% of the Deaths were in Vaccinated (70% in Boosted) cases. This has continued that way ever since then.
stop believing lies !!!
UM, "safe and effective" is now proving to be a lie, as the executives from Pfizer are now stating publicly that they NEVER EVEN TESTED THE SHOTS FOR WHETHER THEY STOP TRANSMISSION
Again not a credible source
Are you meaning that msn news is not a credible source? I don’t normally believe them either. It is just that I received that clip from multiple Telegram pages of multiple highly esteemed physicians working collaboratively around the world on these matters, but I did not think that you were going to open a Telegram link, likely not knowing what that is, (i.e. a communication platform NOT under the management of the big FAANG -Facebook Apple Amazon Netflix & Google, so not biased due to investment ties with C-19 vax manufacturers.) I picked msn because I thought it would be more familiar to you as it seems more mainstream. Please note, it is a video clip taken not too long ago from the European Parliament's closed caption recording system. I don't have access to that, but what I linked you to was the clip that is circulating by the Member of the European Parliament who asked the question of the Pfizer executive herself. Note also that Brownstone Institute found this clip to be authentic enough to cite in this article: https://brownstone.org/articles/solidarity-argument-vaccination-false/
With your educational background in the sciences, please take a closer look at the details in work like this:
“Risk of heart complications is HIGHER after COVID-19 injections” Canadian Covid Care Alliance member Deanna McLeod presented this on November 16th 2022. Check out how Big Pharma’s version of the data differs from the version provided by independent scientists with no ties to vaccine profit making. https://www.bitchute.com/video/JBmMFfpC28ok/
Please also see:
https://canadahealthalliance.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Immunology-101_-why-intramuscular-COVID-19-vaccination-must-fail-%E2%80%93-Doctors-for-COVID-Ethics.pdf Keep in mind that one of the authors was doing ground breaking research in the complement immune system at the Max Planck Institute 30 + years ago. This is the calibre of the people I have been following for over 18 months.
Back to the video with Dr. Makis, the other key speaker that night was Dr. Charles Hoffe - the one who started getting folks to safety test for D-dimers. He starts at the 12 minute mark. You can see the slides coming from pathologists who know how to stain tissue for spike protein and nucleocapsids how much damage is COVID-19 related vs. how much damage is to be attributed to regular “COVID infection
Where both items appear in the tissue of the deceased, one can definitely attribute their death to COVID-19 as the nucleocapsid is the body's reaction to the virus. Where only spike protein appears, one can definitively attribute the death to the vaccine, as it teaches the body to make only spike protein. Listen carefully for the QUANTITY of mRNA instruction packs included in a typical dose and for how long these have been found in the body.
Then do the math. Each time your vax induced antibodies wear off (3-5 months) your vax induced spike protein remain... such that the multiply vaxed are more at risk of severe anything now than the unvaxxed - anything given the long list of adverse events that Pfizer even KNEW ABOUT before the public roll out. Listen carefully as Dr. Hoffe talks about how many items Pfizer listed (and tried to hide for 50 years) while marketing the "95% efficacy" crap.
Dr. Charles Hoffe is a busy small town BC physician, not a research scientist with publications to his name. But other major research scientists have picked on the observation made by Dr. Hoffe. There are now over 3500 hits on a search in PubMed looking for "D-Dimer" and "Covid 19"- plenty to read for anyone who may wish to double check if they need anti-coagulant therapy to break down potential spike induced micro clotting.
Another person doing good work without publishing in peer reviewed journals is Scottish professor of nursing, Dr. John Campbell who has become a go-to on Covid for the past two years. At some point he went from being pro vax to being a vax sceptic - it was when the 80,000+ pages of Pfizer trial data started becoming public last March. He does his recordings live, so one could really sense the puzzlement in his voice as he was looking over data on vaccine harm for the first time as he was recording.
Here is the link to his work https://www.youtube.com/user/Campbellteaching and here is the link to where the Pfizer data dumps have been parked. See https://phmpt.org/
(There was a recent FOIP request in one of the maritime provinces to ask if the provincial science advisory group or gov ministers have any written record of having discussed the Pfizer data dump and the answer was NOT AT ALL - which is unconscionable, since this data has been out since March and is growing month by month. It is being analyzed very carefully by hordes of international scientists and medical trial investigators, but apparently not in Canadian government circles.)
So much for experienced medical professions without an academic publication career. But since you were asking for peer reviewed medical studies, you shall have them….
The Canadian Covid Care Alliance refers people to the FLCCCA protocols but they have provided an easy to read version for laypeople to use for reference
The World Council for Health also has a layperson friendly version of a COVID treatment guide https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/WCH-At-Home-Treatment-Guide_30-Sept-2021.pdf (neither of these reprint the references, but if someone were to contact either organization, I am sure the references could be supplied, and I assume they both follow the FLCCCA, as the FLCCCA adapts their work based on evolving science, new variants, etc. since they are in communication with other similar organizations around the world.
Peer Reviewed Scientific Articles re: Vaxx Injuries
See:
Now, do you really think many journals will be open to publishing how the so-called vaccines are NOT safe and effective if they are receiving funds from BigPharma? (There are legal and financial experts who have been following the money for a long time who know which journals are compromised.)
Fortunately Dr. Peter Doshi, co-editor of the BMJ is not compromised
See the 13 hits a search with his name gets us
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Peter+Doshi+COVID
(some of these are opinion pieces he places in his role as editor, others are peer reviewed studies.)
Here is a video where at the 1 hour and 12 minute mark Dr. Doshi comments on various aspects in response to a publication on the Unintended Consequences of Vaccine Mandates (speaking from his vantage point as journal editor):
See also the 1 hour 48 min mark
A search for Yellow Card and Covid in the BMJ got me 10 hits that you could get started on (Adverse effects related to menstruation, myocarditis, and more, including "Regulatory Agency had received yellow card reports of 411 cases of major thromboembolic events with concurrent thrombocytopenia after ..")
https://www.bmj.com/search/advanced/yellow%20card%20COVID
Oddly, the majority of the hits include the phrase "after vaccination" even though I did not type that into the search.
What about long covid sufferers? Do you want me to forgo the vaccine and end up with a debilitating chronic fatigue do to post viral infection harm.
So the recent science now shows that it is the Spike protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus which causes the damage of Covid and LongCovid and it is the spike protein generated in the body because of the vax that causes one of the many categories of harm to the vaccine injured. So essentially treatments to prevent and treat COVID also treat and prevent Long Covid and treat a significant number of vax injuries. So I would like you (and everyone) to forgo the vax so that you do not get debilitating chronic fatigue (or all the other harms) due to vax injuries WHILE also being aware of the peer reviewed data that…
a) you likely already have lasting immunity
b) you can prevent Covid by using the protocols provided by the FLCCC specialists. https://covid19criticalcare.com/treatment-protocols/
I do want to recommend, if you do nothing else, that you at the very least look at this Canadian production UNIFORMED CONSENT, as one thing we CANNOT disagree on is that people who received the shots were NOT given a full cost/benefit analysis as part of their pre-vax deliberations: https://librti.com/view-video/uninformed-consent
And I close with this link, a riff on a Beatles song, perfect for our time. https://rumble.com/v1nujz6--amazing-the-sound-of-silenced-science-the-adverse-events-featuring-the-spi.html I guess a takeaway could be "Just because I haven't heard of something doesn't mean it can't be true."
Take care,
in love and concern,
(my name)