Ask first - Shoot Later!
Ask first - Shoot Later!
Questions to ask the pharmacist when seeking to give informed consent before receiving a Covid booster…
In the past, public health authorities WARNED citizens to be wary of public health dangers (i.e. smoking, alcohol in pregnancy, opioid overdose, dehydration, waterborne diseases while hiking, i.e. “beaver fever”, candy causing cavities, sexually transmitted infections, etc. etc.)
Now, citizens are NOT being told to stay away from what would be the greatest health disabler of the centuries.
Now, we hear that the US based Centres for Disease Control is NOT up front with the population on the Covid-19 injections.
"Every day, the news gets more grim: in the latest revelation, the CDC seems to have kept two separate books on vaccine injury ... there is every effort being made to keep a lid on what surely ranks as the greatest failure/scandal in the modern history of public health." — Jeffrey A. Tucker, Brownstone Institute
And sadly, now we have parents like Dan Hartman preparing Wrongful Death lawsuits against Pfizer instead of cheering their sons on at the local hockey game. (See page 2 of this issue of Druthers.)
This can all be prevented.
Ask First - Shoot Later!
Imagine getting this set of questions into the hands of EVERYONE who is still, for whatever reason, considering getting “up to date” on their latest Covid-19 boosters.
Can you please point me in the direction of the research that supports this current booster - alone and in combination with a flu shot? I am looking for long term studies in animals and humans showing the necessity, efficacy and safety of these products.
Why are so many of the known adverse events of this injection NOT included on the consent form that needs to be signed prior to injection? Have you seen https://dailyclout.io/home/#pfizer-reports ?
Assuming human trials were done on this version of the booster, what before and after follow up was done on the trial subjects? Since MRIs, D-Dimer tests and antibody profiles have pointed to vaccine damage in recipients of earlier versions of this product, was this type of follow up done on trial subjects to ensure they had no effects of this newer version?
Given that we are no longer in an emergency situation, the terms of the interim orders no longer apply. Has Health Canada now reverted to its former vaccine approval process (involving three independent placebo controlled trials with a combined total of at least 9000 subjects)? If not, why not?
Have you personally made an effort to locate the data on the bio distribution, toxicology, reproductive toxicity, etc. of this (or any previous) Covid-19 products you may have administered? If not, who in your professional organization is known to have accessed this data? Is this data age-stratified?
Does the data differentiate between those with zero, one, two, three or more previous injections to see if potential adverse events are dose dependent? Or is it known that this data does not exist for these products?
Are you aware of patients who have had long term disabilities, increased cancer rates or other adverse effects with an onset weeks or months after previous Covid-19 injections?
What treatment protocols have you been able to provide for them? How well have these protocols helped mitigate the symptoms? If I were to also experience adverse events, do you have the expertise to take on my care?
Here is a printable version of these questions - perfect for leaving in every drug store you encounter.
Compare these questions with the questions included in government-issued Q & A documents on the topic. You may find that they…
a) are NOT really about the product itself, or its potential effects on the body
b) are NOT providing honest evidence based answers within the context of known vaccine-induced harms. There are no references to peer-reviewed data that addresses/scientifically counters the publicly available information collected by vaccine-safety advocates.
Here are a few examples from Alberta.
Note, “Immune Response” means increased levels against antibodies against SPIKE PROTEIN - one of the 28 proteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The “protection” in this case is theoretical, since while the mRNA instructions trigger the body to first MAKE countless spike protein, the immune system then needs to ATTACK and REMOVE this onstage of spike protein. The immune system is being compromised as the body then needs to replenish the immune cells that are taken out in this self-generated spike protein attack! Vaccine generated spike protein has been found in the body even 6 months post injection. And, spike protein is the component of the SARS-CoV-2 virus to which much of the inflammation of Covid-19 is credited.
The implication that EXTENSIVE adverse event monitoring has been done with both injections combined is a blatant falsehood. And note that there are NO questions about the safety of the COVID-19 vaccine itself. Nothing about increased disabilities, cancer rates, all cause mortality, etc. etc.
Note, there is nothing here about how immunity from infection is more robust and covers a wider range of virus components than immunity conferred via the injection. People who recovered from SARS 17 years ago were still protected against the different yet related Corona virus SARS-CoV-2.
Remember:
See:
See also this video on the topic of Informed Consent prepared 2 years ago by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance: https://www.canadiancovidcarealliance.org/media/informed-consent-its-your-right/
Finally, for more information on the changes to Health Canada’s regulatory system, please listen to this testimony to the National Citizens’ Inquiry by regulatory lawyer Shawn Buckley. No, Health Canada has NOT reverted to its pre-Covid approval process. In fact, it is moving to REDUCE the burden of proof on manufacturers even further. See
