Reposted: Pathologists & a Fetal/Maternal Health Specialist Speak out -- Covid Vaccines NOT safe in pregnancy, despite Public Health Officers saying they are
How can "officials", the media and many in society keep insisting they are safe? What happens when the explosive new kid on the block (mRNA Vac) keeps getting compared to all the kids there first...?
NOTE: A link to an important interview with Dr. Ryan Cole was added between the sections on Drs. Thorp and Hodkinson (August 27, 2022)
“Hands on” Experts warn of Deadly Consequences of COVID-19 injections
Public Health websites keep recommending COVID-19 vaccines before and during pregnancy, touting their safety. Yet highly experienced fetal & maternal health specialists like Dr. James Thorp have a preponderance of evidence of harms that point right back to COVID-19 vaccination. See Adverse Events in Women of Childbearing Age and Pregnancy. From his presentation, here he correlates very different data sources all pointing to a boom in disability claims and “all cause mortality” not from 2020 when folks were worried about “dying from COVID” but from 2021 when “a shot in the arm” was to “prevent further harm.”
US Pathologist, Dr. Ryan Cole in speaking with BrightLight News, shines a light on the multiple pathways of harm of the COVID-19 injections. He focuses on the combination of lipid nanoparticles and modified genes. Not only do the lipid nanoparticles include the toxin PEG, they were intended for use in delivering cancer drugs to tumors in the brain. As such, they are able to cross the blood brain barrier. Yet now they deliver instructions to the brain cells teaching them to create spike protein, which the immune system will promptly attack alongside of the brain cells that made them…. that - in brief - is an explanation for the wide range of neurological symptoms that have emerged alongside of spike protein related cardiac symptoms of the jab.
For Dr. Cole
TRUTH + TRANSPARENCY = TRUST
Until the scientific community is truthful and transparent with what they know and knew how and when about what, the citizenry will have trouble regaining trust. Please spend 20+ minutes listening to his sombre yet encouraging message here:
https://brightlightnews.com/a-lipid-nanoparticle-2/ Speaking in plain language, Dr. Cole summarizes in short order the most crucial issues and points to their crucial implications that we overlook at our peril.
Dr. Roger Hodkinson is a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University and a Fellow of the College of American Pathologists (FCAP) and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC).
During his long career he has had many leadership roles in Canadian medicine both provincially and nationally, including being a university teacher, national pathology board examiner, and laboratory accreditation inspector.
He was previously the President of the Alberta Society of Laboratory Physicians, an Assistant Professor in the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Alberta, and CEO of a large community based medical laboratory with a full menu of testing for infectious disease and virology.
He is currently the Chairman of an American biotechnology company active in DNA sequencing. But he is most proud of his role for many years in public health advocacy as Honorary Chairman of ASH, Action on Smoking and Health, which is the leading non-profit organization in Canada tackling the predatory marketing strategies of Big Tobacco, and for which he was made Citizen of the Year in Edmonton, Alberta. (Text from Taking Back Our Freedoms where he serves as Advisor to the Board. https://tbof.ca/about-us/roger-hodkinson/)
Here he is in a 30 minute recording by Brightlight News dated August 7, 2022. https://brightlightnews.com/interview-there-could-be-a-significant-reduction-in-human-ability-to-populate-dr-roger-hodkinson/ (The matter of fertility is addressed in the last third of the video.)
Image Source: https://www.cancernetwork.com/view/fertility-preservation-shows-promise-for-patients-with-cancer
======================
Myth? or Reality? Flipping the Picture
Meanwhile, Alberta Health Services continues posting the same recommendations re: COVID-19 and pregnancy as they showed last year.
Did you know that in Alberta, it is a MYTH that COVID-19 vaccination is dangerous in pregnancy?
Source: https://www.albertahealthservices.ca/assets/info/ppih/if-ppih-covid-19-myth-busters.pdf (Dated November 2021)
In Alberta, in November 2021, it was also a myth that COVID-19 vaccines are not safe.
Once upon a time, many people thought all this was true. Now, in 2022, the MYTH/FACT labels need to be switched around, as there is evidence showing that four claims in the graphic above are counter to proven evidence.
The only way to make the first sentence ring true would be to swap the word “ARE” with “WERE DEEMED” —> The vaccines approved for use in Canada WERE DEEMED safe and effective. How did that come about?
Safe?!! Says Who? Based on Which Data?
Did Health Canada really do a true risk/benefit analysis on these products before providing the approval? What would that have looked like? Much like any informed decision making, evaluating the Pros & Cons of following through with an action AND OF NOT following through with it would definitely have been in order. As would recognizing that within different contexts (health conditions, degree of interactions with possible ill people, etc. ) the list of pros and cons for different population groups could be longer or shorter, as they would also be for different individuals within those groups.
Upon closer examination, however, the approval was not based on a full risk/benefit analysis. Instead, as we hear from Lawyer Shawn Buckley as part of the Citizens’ Hearings…
You can listen to his whole report: https://www.citizenshearing.ca/day-2-videos-21-24/#shawn
Without understanding just how different these COVID-19 injections are from ‘regular’ live attenuated virus vaccines, many people thought their very status as “vaccines” allows them to sit on the shoulders of giants. In other words, just by their very name, they automatically take on all the “warm fuzzy” characteristics we have appreciated in and associated with vaccination since the days of Edward Jenner in the late 1700s, i.e. this keeps our loved ones safe!!!
Any “muckrakers” among us (those more inclined to do a little digging below the surface) might wonder if this is a variation of “naming to tame” i.e., calling something dangerous by a milder name… A cobra in a cage is not any safer just because you can now call it a pet! (See “Muckraking Tools 101” on page 20 here for more linguistic gymnastics.)
A related assumption: That these products were “rigorously tested” has been completely blown out of the water by the court ordered releases of Pfizer trial data. Former feminist writer Dr. Naomi Wolf is one of the many reporting on the devious and criminal actions by the powers that be at Pfizer for manipulating statistics, disguising death figures, etc. See articles like “Sorry to Announce a Genocide” on her substack: Outspoken with Dr. Naomi Wolf or listen to her speaking here in April 2022 already https://dailyclout.io/dr-naomi-wolf-on-pfizer-they-hid-they-concealed-they-redacted/
Of note are the remarks made a few months back by Dr. Peter Doschi, senior editor of the BMJ (formerly called The British Medical Journal), whose research centers on the regulatory approval of pharmaceutical products. He was commenting on an article published in May 2022 entitled “The Unintended Consequences of COVID-19 vaccine Mandates: why mandates, passports and restrictions may cause more harm than good”
I don’t think any public health scientist should be recommending a vaccine mandate if you don’t have the raw data from…say…vaccine trials. … So why do we need it? We need it to be able to critically assess it. I mean, it seems crazy to consider something to be science-based without having the data. So I’ll just speak a little bit about data transparency. …
We live in a world, I think, my observations are that sort of everybody thinks the other guy has checked the data and so we’re in good shape because of that. So I wanted to ask… well who has actually seen the data? What do they mean by that?
So data comes in many forms [he lists various forms] and then you have sort of these reports of various lengths. So for example, in terms of the package that a regulator can see if they want to, we’re talking of hundreds of thousands of pages here of data.
Who’s seen those data? Well, agencies like the CDC for example, have NOT seen the raw data. Advisory committees that advise decision makers like FDA, FDA’s Advisory Committee hasn’t seen the raw data. Our Surgeon General hasn’t seen the raw data. The journals that publish the trials haven’t seen the raw data. Peer reviewers haven’t seen the raw data. So it’s just regulators and its not even all regulators that see the complete data. So for example EMA [in Europe], the Australian regulator, Health Canada did not get patient-level data sets. If they did, we would be talking about a massive amount of information that would take a while to wrap your head around to really critically assess it. So FDA did this job back in December 2020 in about three weeks…. Now, in a normal compressed timeline we’re dealing with around six months. So they really compressed the timeline on these products. If you read the documents in terms of their -not the original data but their evaluations of the data - they release memoranda - if you read them, they are pretty clear from Day 1 that we don’t know whether or not the vaccines will prevent infection. We don’t know. It’s an unknown.
It was also listed as an unknown, black and white, that we don’t know how long protection lasts. We only had data on a few months at that point in time.
At the same time, the agencies are also explicitly telling us that the vaccine will bring us to herd immunity. So there was a huge assumption in there that there was a performance characteristic that they were also at the same time saying that they don’t know whether that’s true.
So …we are putting all our trust in essentially a very few people because of this lack of access to data.
These comments start at the 1 hour 18 minute mark of www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjUskKTq_Qc
The Paradigm Shift - Ignore at (Y)Our Peril
Moving right along the list of “Mythbusting” claims made by the provincial health authority we come to:
“the vaccines cannot give you COVID-19 because they don’t contain the virus that causes it”
While technically true, this claim misses the whole entire point about the damage to the body caused when the body receives the instructions for how to make the most dangerous component of the virus. We are essentially giving children the blueprints and a never-ending supply of materials for making explosives to defend themselves from a potential windstorm while congratulating ourselves because we are not giving them the bombs themselves.
Our cells are being given the mRNA (instructions) to create spike protein (one of 28 proteins on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus) in order to trigger the body into creating a defensive army (antibodies) to fight off the next time, if ever, the person should encounter the virus that causes COVID-19. I use children and explosives in this metaphor, since like little kids might not really understand the bigger picture here, so too many public health officials still believe that these mRNA vaccines function like “regular” ones. By their continued extortion to “keep everyone safe” by injecting more instructions to make more spike protein without understanding the explosive effects these can have on potentially every system in the body, public health officials and all who repeat their advice are demonstrating they don’t know they are handling the equivalent of dynamite and even passing it on to infants.
Returning to Myths versus Facts in the eyes of Alberta Health Services:
https://www.alberta.ca/covid19-vaccine-myths-and-facts.aspx
Following the link re: fertility leads us to a now 18 month old post (from February 2021) by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists.
Here we see for example,
My comments:
Reactogenicity “represents the physical manifestation of the inflammatory response to vaccination, and can include injection-site pain, redness, swelling or induration at the injection site, as well as systemic symptoms, such as fever, myalgia, or headache.” (Definition from Nature.com)
With the self-reporting tools tied to injection site inflammatory responses of various sorts, a mother who begins feeling any combination of typical COVID-19 vaccine related adverse events far removed from both the arm or the uterus would likely not think there could be a point in reporting sudden facial paralysis, for example, or the advent of psoriasis, or temporary hearing loss. She might very well not know that there is an issue with her kidney or her thyroid that arose post-vax … and neither might her doctor. (See https://www.caers.info/adverse-events-reference-guide for a peer-reviewed list of adverse events that need to be included in every future study monitoring the safety of COVID-19 injections in EVERY RECIPIENT, pregnant or not.
A study that relies on “limited self-reported information” would miss out on the various internal phenomena at the cellular level related to spike-induced-disease SID. Elevated D-Dimer levels cannot be seen or felt and require specified testing to verify that neither the mother nor the child is suffering from spike protein induced microscopic blood clots that have the potential to be disabling or fatal months or possibly years after injection.
Absent reams and reams of pregnant moms and babes dying specifically OF COVID (with confirmed PCR testing at 24 cycles, not above), there was no rush to recommend that women take this injection during their pregnancy, as long as the recommendation “LONGDITUDINAL FOLLOWUP IS NEEDED” had not been carried out. By the time most CMOH’s were recommending COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, monoclonal antibodies were already successfully used as a treatment option (not to mention other early treatment options accessible in various jurisdictions if not our own…) and the risk ratio for women in the childbearing years for getting severely ill from COVID-19 was very low.
These were the cumulative Alberta stats over 18 months into the declared pandemic for all ages. The survival rate for the under 50s alone would be even higher.
A look at V-Safe reveals:
Just what everyone wanted to hear!!! But… scrolling back a few slides we note that these happy results were really just based on roughly 30% of the study participants. Those babies yet to be delivered i.e. who as a fetus would have even more time to be impacted by the harms of spike protein, were not included and neither were all the many “pending follow up” and “lost to follow up.”
(Source: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2021-09-22/09-COVID-Olson-508.pdf)
Further following the trail of references, from the document by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists leads us to only THREE studies (all dated 2021) which points yet again to the lack of CURRENT data undergirding government recommendations. Here, a look at only the first.
Gray (2021) - 84 pregnant & 31 lactating women are injected with two doses of messenger RNA vaccination. Levels of very specific antibodies were measured at baseline, a 2 - 6 weeks after the second dose and upon delivery and were found to be higher than those measured in women who had not been dosed but who had recovered from COVID-19 previously. A questionnaire was used to ascertain post-injection symptoms. It too, like the v-Safe example above points to a very narrow list of expected adverse events - those typical of live-attenuated vaccines (a non-infectious portion of the actual virus)
While well-meaning yet only narrowly-informed scientists were busy trying to use the old vaccine measuring devices (the ones that worked well for all previous vaccines), the powers that be over at the manufacturing plants and the regulators were busy hiding the explosive news… this new thing (for which we had to change the definition so we could even call it a vaccine) is explosive..it ain’t at all what we promised the world this would be….(oops!)
Regular vaccines and these novel mRNA gene based toxic products are MILES apart.
We need to stop measuring in millimeters what needs to be measured in miles.
Do you see the explosion now? Compare the number of reported serious adverse events of COVID-19 vaccines with the adverse events of all other vaccines in the past.
HUGE thanks to David Dickson for his illuminating portrayals of official data!! See https://www.dksdata.com/COVID19
In summary
We are predisposed to think positively about a product delivered to us under a positive name.
We assume Health Canada has a rigorous testing/approval method when it might have had one in the past. Yet we are unaware that for whatever reasons, these products specifically are following a different pathway somewhere within the bureaucracy.
We expect that “detailed” risk/benefit analyses were done for different demographics but we see that little attention was paid to certain quadrants of the risk/benefit chart. Even while teachers are expected to tailor their instruction to a diversity of students, and nurses deliver “person-centered care” when it cam to the COVID-19 mass vaccination drive, it was to be “one-size-fits-all” no questions asked, take it or leave it, i.e. the jab or the job! Physicians were threatened by their regulatory bodies with loosing their licenses/livelihoods if they put their principles (ABOVE ALL DO NO HARM) ahead of their pocketbooks and wrote exemption letters for the very fragile. Did our press report on how many Canadian doctors had their offices and file drawers raided to look for exemption letters to keep their patients away from harm?
We need to understand that the “miracle” that this fast development might have been, it wasn’t at all what it seemed. (Read Dr. David Martin and the Fauci Dossier or RFK Jr’s The Real Anthony Fauci). We need to be far less trusting that some experts elsewhere are all doing their job as diligently as we ourselves would, if only it were up to us.
We need to awaken to the paradigm shift that Dr. Byram Bridle was trying to alert the world about when he announced, based on PFIZER DATA, that injecting people with the instructions to make spike protein was a huge mistake.
We all need to get up to speed on spike protein related inflammation, thrombosis, etc. etc. (aka SID - Spike Protein Induced Diseases) and stop injecting more people to perpetuate the cycle. We—the vaxxed, the unvaxxed, the boosted, the not-yet boosted—need to learn that this is dose dependent and we need to fight it together.
We need to understand that the only way to “keep everyone safe” and “flatten the new curve” … the growing wave of spike-protein induced disabilities, disease and death … is to STOP THE SHOTS; GET PROVEN THERAPEUTICS TO THE ILL AND INJURED and WEAKEN CORPORATE CENSORSHIP POWERS.
OTHERWISE we won’t see the forest for the trees…
We will continue to misdiagnose those many “sudden unexplained” fatalities …
We will remain ignorant of the daily death counts, reports of which are banned on all news providers who have signed various 'Journalism Trust/Truth in Media’ initiatives alongside the vaccine investors (Google, Facebook, Twitter)
i.e. Wolves in Sheep’s clothing who give themselves the right to determine such weighty matters as What is Truth? What is Disinformation? essentially fueling fear and panic, flaming demand for “solutions” already made but as yet hidden, herding the hearts and minds of consumers - including nations - right to where they can drop their dollars and boost investment profits for the few - to heck with the lives and rights of the many.
Currently, it is the growing, independent, uncensored platforms that we are increasingly turning to to find out what the dinosaur media is not telling us. Platforms that by pass the whole corporate news structure and put the microphone directly in the hands of those right in the action, like
Alberta Physician and Cancer Researcher: Alberta Health Services (AHS), Cross Cancer Institute, University of Alberta - Dr. William Makis MD, reporting on GETTR about the sudden deaths of 13 Canadian fellow physicians - in temporal association with their third or fourth dose of COVID-19 vaccine - at least 150 years of years of medical education stopped in its tracks - and not a peep in the mainstream channels :-( https://gettr.com/user/makismd
Professor of Media, Culture, and Communication at New York University Dr. Mark Crispin Miller, reporting his News from the Underground on SUBSTACK of the attempts to at least mention publicly the names and profiles of those disappearing from among us around the world - again without a recognition of their passing in the mainstream. For over a hundred tributes of Canadians who passed in one week alone - from the 13 year old schoolboy to the 59-year-old senior director of CTV National News —> See
as well as similar heart-wrenching posts from other countries and continents.
A world-wide pandemic of “mysterious deaths” among the living and the unborn alike.
I shudder to think what the numbers are now, a year later, now that teens and adults are on their 3rd & 4th shots and newborns, toddlers and 5-11 year olds have also been injected.
There is only one answer: It’s time to #StopTheShots
Click here for a 14 minute summary of the key issues prepared by the Canadian Covid Care Alliance.
Addendum - Clinical Trial Pfizer Data shows they only tracked 32 of the over 200 pregnancies among trail participant and of those 32 only ONE had a normal healthy outcome. As discussed on the show: This Week with Mary and Polly (Sept 7, 2022) on Children's Health Defense https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/this-week (at about the 9 minute mark).