When Dr. Byram Bridle speaks, EVERYONE should listen ... examples of Vaccine FRAUD

From Day 1 of the Vancouver hearings of the 2024 National Citizen Inquiry

Dr. Bridle is NOT an “anti-vaxxer” and he is VERY SADDENED to see the chaos in which the field of vaccinology finds itself at this point in time because of the COVID fiasco. He understands that people have lost trust in his field.

At first, he was glad to hear that HCQ and IVM were being reported not to be working.

He had been given a contract to work on a mRNA COVID-19 vaccine for Canada.

When he first heard of the back and forth between Pfizer and Japan, he got the documents translated in to English. The claim had been that the vaccine ingredients stay in the arm of the person being injected. But Pfizer’s biodistribution data (using mice and rats injected) showed something very concerning. The test at the time injected the lipid nanoparticles not filled with mRNA coded for spike protein yet, but for some kind of tracer protein. This would allow researchers to track the path taken by the lipid nanoparticles.

[Editor’s note - because the word FRAUD comes up frequently in Dr. Bridle’s presentation, here is a definition that goes beyond the usual monetary context:

So being tricked into believing that the COVID-19 vaccine products were safe, effective and even necessary, induced people to give up their right to fully informed consent. ]

It may take some time for the NCI volunteers to clip out each of the speakers into separate videos. For the time being, Dr. Bridle can be heard at the 5hour40 minute mark here: https://rumble.com/v5izvud-nci-vancouver-2024-hearings-day-1-october-17-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

DELIBERATE FRAUD example

By averaging out data for both male and female Pfizer HID what happens to females alone… i.e. a spike in how much LNP was going straight to important organs in females.

EXAMPLE OF SELECTIVE FOCUS

Data on how quickly LNPs were showing up in other organs was deep in the data tables, but not shown graphically as in the above liver example. Here Dr. Bridle simply illustrated the data being included but purposely not illustrated. It would have been the job of the regulators to ACTUALLY LOOK AT the data tables and do the math to see this:

This shows that WITHIN MERE HOURS after being injected with Lipid Nanoparticles (LNP) “carrier molecules” the mRNA coded to teach body cells to make the most harmful component of the CARS-CoV-2 virus (as shown earlier by the SALK institute) would be arriving in bone marrow, in the eye, in the bladder, in adrenal glands, etc.) Regulators should also have understood that LNP was initially planned for use in brain cancer therapy and as such could TRAVEL THROUGH the BLOOD BRAIN BARRIER… so a question should have been how much time does it take to get to the brain? [I am adding this comment, it was not part of Dr. Bridle’s talk here.]

Dr. Bridle had found out that the above mentioned Biodistribution study was not the first. Apparently Pfizer had done an earlier one with WORSE results and then submitted this second one.

DELIBERATE FRAUD example

Here, mice were injected with LNP that transported instructions for body cells to make the luminescent protein that lights up fireflies (Luciferase). But when Pfizer sent in photographs of the mice all lit up, they CUT THE PICTURE OFF - effectively HIDING the fact that the tracker showed up in the mouse KIDNEYS. (They only let it be known that the LPN had delivered the tracker to the LIVER, which would be needed if components were to be broken down.)

DELIBERATE FRAUD example

This basically means that the claim that within a short time all the vaccine components are excreted from the body was NOT actually proven.

Note Dr. Bridle’s repeated use of the word NEFARIOUS - there is no other word to be used… not only did Pfizer hide data, the US Food and Drug Administration did not point out the redaction or refuse to accept the reports as submitted. [Keep in mind that in the US, the regulators get Pharma money WHEN they approve products. And in Canada, no one looked closely either, likely ASSUMING that if the FDA approves something it must be ‘safe and effective’.]

MORE FRAUD

[NOTE how Dr. Bridle makes a point of including REFERENCES for all his points - where do we see references on Health Canada websites re: vaccine messaging they share?]

Next, Dr. Bridle referred to Sask MP Wagantall’s Order Paper Question and the answers provided by Health Canada.

What Health Canada revealed shows that EVERY Canadian politician and public health official was stating publicly about the COVID-19 vaccine being ‘tested’ and ‘proven safe’ in various groups like pregnant women, the immunocompromised, the elderly, etc. WAS FALSE. Health Canada should have taken the responsibility to reach out to all those making such statements and quietly revising their talking points.

So PFIZER NEVER SAID that its product was SAFE in pregnancy and that it would be SAFE for breastfeeding babies.

DELIBERATE FRAUD example

Pfizer also did NOT SAY you getting the shot would protect your grandmother from illness. All it said was that whatever response the vaccine product elicits in the body MAY CONTRIBUTE TO PROTECTION against COVID-19… [leaving the door open to other means of protection as well?]

This next slide is damning to EVERY PUBLIC HEALTH OFFICIAL, every “vaccine expert”, everyone who recommended injection or injected any of these “vulnerable” groups - pregnant and lactating mothers; immunocompromised people; frail and elderly people; those with autoimmune disorders; children under 12. Here Pfizer admits they DID NOT HAVE DATA for these groups. Nor did they have long term safety data.

WHY WAS HEALTH CANADA SILENT WHENEVER ANYONE CLAIMED THERE WAS EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT INJECTING ALL THESE INDIVIDUALS?

There is no such thing as an “authorized” vaccine. The correct phrasing should have been “authorized by interim order” or “authorized with terms and conditions”. The “terms and conditions” included Pfizer’s research management plan.. in other words, authorization ONLY WITHIN what was actually researched.

Pfizer purposely tried to screen OUT pregnant participants. But some only discovered their pregnancy during the course of the trial. This is what happened with them:

When 24% = roughly ONE in FOUR people, it is important to take the issue seriously!!!

WHEN MORE frail patients with comorbidities are DYING after the vaccination than NON-frail vaccinated people with comorbidities, shouldn’t that be reported? or when HALF of the frail people with comorbidities are showing SERIOUS adverse events?

Here, it is best to hear Dr. Bridle explain all this directly as the screen caps are fuzzy. Essentially he said that taken out of context, those numbers re: hospitalizations and deaths were meaningless, even to him as a professional in the field. BUT WHEN COMPARED TO THE FLU VACCINE, there now was some way to understand the COVID-19 statistics.

And there was much more… a few screen caps will be added later.

But now it is time to listen to DAY 2!

See: https://rumble.com/v5j4dp0-nci-vancouver-2024-hearings-day-2-october-18-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp